|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 27, 2018, 02:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2008
Posts: 508
|
Parkerized government size 1911
Looking for a hopefully new, parkerized 1911A1 government model .45acp with complete GI specs. I mean with wide hammer spur, and double diamond wood grips.i have looked online, but with so many 1911s being made, it is hard to choose a good company, I know nothing about. Anyone own or know of a company that makes a good one, please help. Thanks.
|
June 27, 2018, 02:35 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
When double diamond grips were in use, M1911s were blued.
By the time M1911A1s were being made in quantity, the finish had changed to Parkerizing and grips had changed to plastic. The best of the reasonably priced M1911A1 reproductions - parkerized - is the now discontinued Springfield G.I. Among new production, Auto Ordnance has the most accurate appearance. If you want a WWI-style pistol, blued with wood grips, there isn't much available new. Colt was making a lot of commemorative pistols in 2011, and some of them have become reasonably priced. There's a couple of guns made in the Philippines that have a kinda/sorta accurate appearance, but not close enough that I'd be satisfied with one if I were looking for a period replica.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. Last edited by RickB; June 27, 2018 at 02:42 PM. |
June 27, 2018, 03:00 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
Agree with Rick, but peacetime blue 1911A1s with full checkered walnut grips are good looking.
The AO is probably the most WWII GI looking gun in current production, that or the Inland which may well be the same gun with different trademark. A wide spur early A1 hammer will be a good trick, though. Last edited by Jim Watson; June 27, 2018 at 03:47 PM. |
June 27, 2018, 03:34 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,616
|
The Kahr WWII repro I had was about as close as I could find when I had it. Of course, if you can score one of those limited Colt custom shop repros, that would be even better.
__________________
Proud to have served. |
June 27, 2018, 03:36 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Boston, People's Republic of MA
Posts: 1,616
|
Ah. Just realized I still have a pic of it.
__________________
Proud to have served. |
June 27, 2018, 03:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2012
Posts: 1,055
|
AO's are a toss of the dice,they resemble a 1911A1.
Mine was a basket case,granted that was a few years back and I knew what I was getting into but I was not disappointed,every conceivable stoppage,defective parts you name it but it was a project pistol and it runs very well now in fact I was shooting it today,no issues just fine.Good luck anyway whatever your choice. |
June 27, 2018, 05:30 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
A-O has gotten their act together, regarding the accuracy of the appearance, if not the actual shooting aspect.
I bought an A-O frame kit in the early '90s, and while the frame itself is pretty nice, some of the small parts were absolute junk. Brian48's gun is an older one, with the "flatter" contours to the front strap and dust cover; Springfields made in the '90s have the same shortcoming, appearance wise. Newer ones are more G.I. in appearance; the easiest way to tell at a glance is to look at the slide stop fit; if it hangs over the edge of the frame above the trigger guard it's an early one. The consensus is Inland = A-O, and I think the latter is cheaper.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
June 27, 2018, 05:48 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,968
|
I guess I'll be the one.....
RIA. |
June 27, 2018, 05:56 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 19, 2001
Posts: 578
|
The Auto Ordnance and Inland are the only 1911A1s out there that would fit your parameters if you buy new. Below are a few pictures of my Inland 1911A1. The Inland is an Auto Ordnance with different markings IMHO. I did add a real Remington Rand trigger and Keys grips on mine. They come with reproduction plastic grips that still look period. I just had the parts handy so I switched them.
__________________
"KNEES IN THE BREEZE" "Shop Smart, Shop S-Mart"- ASH Last edited by EIGHTYDUECE; June 27, 2018 at 06:06 PM. |
June 27, 2018, 06:11 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
|
The posters are right on the money with the Auto Ordnance of current manufacture, the mechanical difference observed when the pistol has been disassembled is a firing pin block. My AO next to my DCM Colt appear to be the same ( other than the double diamond grips on the AO).
RIA Pistols look good except for the “made in Philippines” carved in the frame. Last edited by Ibmikey; June 30, 2018 at 03:42 AM. |
June 27, 2018, 06:29 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 19, 2001
Posts: 578
|
The Rock Island Armory (RIA) has some dimensional differences and there will be a few parts to change to make as close to correct as you will get with them. On mine, I had to buy a correct style Auto Ordnance grip safety, thumb safety, mainspring housing and grips. I tell my friends that it is "close enough for government work"
By the time you make the changes, you are already at the same price or above what you would pay just going and buying the Auto Ordnance though.
__________________
"KNEES IN THE BREEZE" "Shop Smart, Shop S-Mart"- ASH |
June 27, 2018, 07:58 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 406
|
Norinco
Would the Norinco ''Model of the 1911A1 45 Automatic'' fit the bill?
Rmocarsky |
June 27, 2018, 08:52 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2008
Posts: 508
|
Great responses, and great responses. I forgot to ask if are there any series 70s, without that 80s series firing pin block? Sorry. Another senior moment.
|
June 27, 2018, 09:15 PM | #14 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
Quote:
This gun is mostly there, has the correct low profile sights and lanyard loop mainspring housing (albeit with an internal lock system) but has a civilian style enlarged thumb safety and a couple other little thing not entirely correct for a GI gun, but it's very close. I replaced the original grips with USGI plastics for an even closer look. The gear shown, including magazines, is all authentic USGI. |
|
June 27, 2018, 11:04 PM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
|
Quote:
A friend of mine got one of the WW I reproduction 1911s from Turnbull. All period correct markings, grips, finish, etc. The only difference one can tell from a new condition original is a small marking on the slide with the Turnbull logo (to prevent the gun being fraudulently re-sold as an original) It wasn't cheap. Go to Turnbull's website and see what they offer, and if any of them is what you're looking for. If so, open your wallet...wide.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
June 28, 2018, 12:21 AM | #16 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
Quote:
One needn't resort to Doug Turnbull and his multi-thousand dollar guns to get the look and feel of a G.I. 1911... you're simply wrong on this one. |
|
June 28, 2018, 07:13 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2012
Posts: 1,055
|
OP is asking for guidance on an M1911A1 replica,parkerized surface.
M1911 models have significant external differences that he might have already considered before making his choice. |
June 28, 2018, 10:16 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
Not necessarily a knock on those parts, but original specs call for every major component to be a machined forging. That's why I prefer the Springfield as an easy to get option, as the slide, frame, and barrel are all forged, as well as looking right.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
|
June 28, 2018, 12:10 PM | #19 | |||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
|
Quote:
Quote:
The OP gave his requirements, and then asked this.. Quote:
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|||
June 28, 2018, 12:55 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2012
Posts: 432
|
does the discontinued Springfield GI model have the original sized firing pin? or does it have the smaller .38 Super size firing pin?
will a standard GI firing pin fit in a SA GI M1911A1? I prefer 100% parts compatible to be considered a good remake of a GI model the NORINCO is pretty close, except for grip screw bushings thread size |
June 28, 2018, 01:03 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
It sounds like Springfield uses or used the smaller-diameter 9mm/Super firing pin, made from titanium, in conjunction with an extra-extra power firing pin spring, to pass the California drop test without having to resort to a Series 80 or Swartz style firing pin block; pick your poison.
The hole in the breechface would have to be opened slightly to accommodate a .45 firing pin.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
June 28, 2018, 03:27 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2012
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
|
|
June 28, 2018, 03:46 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
If he lives near the Canadian border . . .
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
June 28, 2018, 05:12 PM | #24 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Quote:
If I were seeking to buy a clone of a USGI M1911A1 today, I'd buy an Auto-Ordnance. Quote:
|
||
June 28, 2018, 05:14 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
Good call; the Mil-Spec has a one-piece barrel, while the similar, but cheaper, G.I. has a two-piece.
I had a hi-cap G.I., and should have known.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
|
|