|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 1, 2015, 08:40 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Acceptable group size for 45 Auto strike fired gun??
When you are loading for 45 Auto, what is an acceptable group size for an XD, Glock, M&P type gun?
My last loads from my XD gave me 1.5" at 15 yards. This was developed with 5 shot groups and confirmed with a 16 shot group. Seems pretty good to me?? |
June 1, 2015, 11:31 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2008
Location: Colo Spgs CO
Posts: 517
|
That's a tough question--the answer just depends on so many factors. I don't think 'striker fired' should be any inherent limitation, so I'd expect that whatever a good bullseye shooter can do with a custom 1911, can probably be done with a plastic 45 as well. For me, shooting 1 1/2" groups offhand at 15 yds is the best I can do, and it doesn't happen very consistently for me. My MP45c is capable of it with relatively modest loads under a cast round nose flat point. The shooter seldom is.
I guess what I'd say is that now you have your own 'acceptable standard' or, to put a more positive spin on it, you have set the bar for yourself and your loads. I just did the very same thing with 44 Magnum: same group size at the same distance. Now that load and the shooter should be able to do that 9 times out of ten or more--that's my own goal. But that was with a red dot...big difference from iron sights when you're an old geezer like me. The challenge is that, getting from 4" groups to 1 1/2" groups was brain dead simple. Getting 1 1/2" down to 1" ... well, that will likely be far more difficult. At the moment, it doesn't even seem possible (for me).
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member “If I had to live my life again, I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner.” T Bankhead "I think only the authorities should have weapons." The New American Electorate |
June 2, 2015, 01:19 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
Quote:
Don't know why striker fired guns would have a different accuracy standard though. I'm always striving for ≤3" groups at 25 yards with my HK45C. If I had a high end 1911 or full size HK I would expect better. |
|
June 2, 2015, 02:55 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2007
Location: Between CA and NM
Posts: 858
|
My goal with all standard handguns is <2" at 25 yards.
Not all guns can do it. 1.5" off-hand at 15 yards is just fine. |
June 2, 2015, 03:46 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
First, I'm judging the load and not the gun. I'm trying to decide when the load is "developed" and ready to make 1000 plus.
Quote:
Thanks for the answers. I guess I'm just looking for a gut check before I make a ton of these. |
|
June 2, 2015, 05:27 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2012
Location: Chester Va
Posts: 360
|
I don't think you'll better those groups. What's the recipe?
|
June 2, 2015, 07:45 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,077
|
The largest factor would be the person pulling the trigger. What is "acceptable" mean to you? Worded another way, how well can you shoot other types of handguns?
If you can shoot a revolver or different semiauto into one hole at 15yds, I would say you could do better. If you shoot them about the same as the XD, I'd say the load is fine and the only thing to work on to shrink group size is you. |
June 2, 2015, 09:54 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Acceptable group size is 2" at 25 yards just like any other gun except for belly guns.
|
June 2, 2015, 02:26 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
For what? If your 1.5" is consistent in your hand, it's good. If it's off a machine rest, not so much. However, what kind of shooting you plan on doing matters.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
June 2, 2015, 04:32 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,808
|
My Glocks are every bit as accurate as a standard out of the box 1911. They won't shoot as well as one built as a target gun or one that has been worked over.
|
June 2, 2015, 04:42 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
I'd prefer to test at 25 yards, 3" at that distance is OK 2" would be good for service grade weapons
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
|
|
June 2, 2015, 05:03 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2012
Location: Chester Va
Posts: 360
|
I still need a recipe for such tight groups. Mine are like 6 inch's at 15yds offhand.
|
June 2, 2015, 05:56 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Quote:
Mixed brass - untrimmed WIN LP primers 6.6 gr Longshot Powerbond 230gr plated HP OAL = 1.190" Light crimp |
|
June 2, 2015, 06:05 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2012
Location: Chester Va
Posts: 360
|
Thanks as I load Longshot as well.
|
June 2, 2015, 07:23 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: OTS
Posts: 1,035
|
jmorris nailed it. nuff said.
__________________
Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want. |
June 3, 2015, 04:10 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Jmorris: while I can shoot my S&W 19-3 all into the same hole at 15 yards, it is a different animal.
I guess I'm wondering if 1.5" at 15 yards(rested) is a keeper for IDPA or if others are generally developing 45 auto loads that are closer to an inch with a g21, xd44, etc. I think this load is good enough, especially after I put 16 into 1.5". I'll be loading all I have into this. |
June 3, 2015, 12:25 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2008
Location: Colo Spgs CO
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
At short ranges, I actually have never done noticeably better from a rest than I do offhand, and several times I've done quite a bit worse--sounds ridiculous, but it's a fact. I assume it's my posture, anticipation, poor or different-than-normal grip on the gun. Have not gotten it sorted yet. In any case, I'd load up a few boxes and do some Bill Drills or similar, and see how you feel about reacquiring the target rapidly. For me, IDPA and IPSC was usually more about: 1) Remember to use your sightsthan it was about accuracy. I tend to panic a bit and get in a hurry, which slows me down.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member “If I had to live my life again, I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner.” T Bankhead "I think only the authorities should have weapons." The New American Electorate Last edited by Bongo Boy; June 3, 2015 at 12:46 PM. |
|
June 3, 2015, 01:10 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: March 5, 2015
Posts: 44
|
I evaluate my handloads shooting from a rest to try and evaluate the loads, not my shooting. My target groupings are 1" at 10yds, 1.5" at 15 yards, and 2.5" at 25 yards. When I start seeing .8" at 10yds, 1.2" at 15yds and 2" at 25yds, then I start taking notice.
I only reload for 9mm, 40s&w and 357sig and has the same grouping expectation for all 3 calibers. Can't see why 45acp will be any different. |
June 4, 2015, 03:38 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,077
|
Quote:
That said IDPA does not require as much accuracy as some games, you would do better with more accuracy but you can still win against pistols better suited for the game than an XD, you just have to shoot, move and reload faster. Of course if they do them as fast or even a bit slower but more accurately, you loose. |
|
June 4, 2015, 05:24 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2015
Posts: 330
|
You got a winner. The number of people who can consistently shoot 2 or 3 inch, 10 shot groups, with a stock pistol, at 25 yards isn't many. Doing it once don't make it consistent. Besides, putting 16 in that 1.5 inch grouping at 15 yards is saying you are right on par to compete with that very rare accuracy at 25. Good shooting and God Bless
|
June 4, 2015, 07:01 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Thanks fellas...I appreciate the input.
|
June 5, 2015, 07:52 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,569
|
Quote:
"Striker vs. hammer" is one of those things that Internet gunboard folks obsess about, that doesn't make any difference.
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. " |
|
June 6, 2015, 07:37 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Compared to a 1911, I find a striker fired gun to have a lower level of accuracy in my experience. I feel this is due to lower trigger pull quality and poorer barrel fitting.
IMO, fine 1911 or revolver should be around 1" at 15 yards... IIRC, my G21 shot about the same. |
June 6, 2015, 03:23 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Posts: 3,077
|
You can get inaccurate firearms in any design and you can get accurate ones in any design as well.
If a person shows preference to a style that doesn't make the others better or worse for anyone except that particular person. |
June 6, 2015, 05:19 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Let's just agree to disagree.
My point was simply that a gun with a long mushy ~7lb pull and a barrel fit at one end will not shoot nearly as well as a gun with a SA trigger pull and a fixed or precision fit barrel. . .in my hands, at least. Therefore, a gu that is capable of 2" 50 yd accuracy will get more extensive load development from me. A 6" 50 yd gun will require less. That is when I get 1.5" 15yd accuracy I feel like I have got 90+% of what it will do and it is time to go into production! Which I have done and will continue to do. |
|
|