The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 15, 2017, 11:51 AM   #1
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
FN 5.7 vs. Glock 17

For any glock haters, just subsitute the glock for your favorite 9mm pistol for comparison.

I was watching Hickok45 on his review of an FN 5.7.
Light bullet weight, super high velocity and low recoi, right?
So the stats for some Amercian eagle 5.7 40 grain ammo is 1655 fps with 243 ft. pounds ME.

So that got me to wondering if you could get a 9mm pistol to act like that?
So Liberty Civil defense 9mm +P is 50 grains @ 2000 fps, and Double tap has a 77 grain at 1625 fps.
Or like this ammo:
https://www.sportsmansguide.com/prod...unds?a=1596238

So the question is, seeing that you could get a 50 grain bullet up to the same speeds as a FN 5.7, could you get the same low recoil effect with a comprable load? More a hypothetical question than why would you want to do that, or comparisons of actual defense use, etc.

So could you get a glock 17 to be like a FN 5.7?
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 12:00 PM   #2
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Question becomes why. The main thrust, to my understanding, of the 5.7mm is to defeat soft body armor. If that's no longer the goal I don't see the point in very lightweight bullets at higher speeds. Handgun barrels are only so long and you can only build so much velocity in that time. I understand it more for rifles and the terminal effect you can have there, but for a pistol? I'd rather stick with a 124 gr bullet moving at 1100-1200 fps or so.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is online now  
Old September 15, 2017, 08:10 PM   #3
Kvon2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2016
Posts: 757
Same school of thought why we're (for the time being) using a 5.56 instead of a .30-something.

Fast light rounds tumble and cause serious destruction to soft targets(like soft tissue and organs). Granted it's much more effective out of a rifle length barrel a round as fast as the 5.7 can still do a lot of damage.

To answer the OP's post, IMO, we're comparing apples to oranges. 9mm defense loads(generally speaking) are designed to expand to cause damage, not really to tumble. If you take the typically heavier 9mm and make it go faster it'll likely just penetrate further, not tumble.

I think both are great options, the only reason I don't own an FN Five SeveN is because they're so damn expensive!

Everything above is my opinion so if someone proves me wrong with science...you win.
Kvon2 is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 08:35 PM   #4
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
Mayber this will help.......

More a hypothetical question

1.than why would you want to do that,

or

2. comparisons of actual defense use, etc.

So the question is, seeing that you could get a 50 grain bullet up to the same speeds as a FN 5.7, could you get the same low recoil effect with a comprable load?
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 08:53 PM   #5
Kvon2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2016
Posts: 757
Sorry if I went down the wrong path...

I guess if the bullet weights, velocities, and firearms are similar then recoil should be similar?
Kvon2 is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 09:02 PM   #6
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Quote:
Fast light rounds tumble and cause serious destruction to soft targets(like soft tissue and organs). Granted it's much more effective out of a rifle length barrel a round as fast as the 5.7 can still do a lot of damage.
Could you point me to some ballistic tests showing 5.7 mm tumbling? My memory seems to think that until you get up to rifle velocities it doesn't really happen and instead you end up punching small holes.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is online now  
Old September 15, 2017, 09:20 PM   #7
Kvon2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2016
Posts: 757
I don't want to take over the OP's thread so I'll send you a PM
Kvon2 is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 09:23 PM   #8
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
Also, I am trying to understand why.....
Supposedly a 115 grain 9mm load gives more felt recoil due to its higher speed than a 147 grain going slower (according to many threads I've read.) I haven't noticed it myself that much, but haven't really given it much thought before).


But then if you go even lighter and faster, then the theoretical curve reverses and the super light bullet going at ultra high speed becomes LIGHTER FELT RECOIL?
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 09:56 PM   #9
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Quote:
Supposedly a 115 grain 9mm load gives more felt recoil due to its higher speed than a 147 grain going slower
I would disagree.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is online now  
Old September 15, 2017, 10:23 PM   #10
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
https://asymammo.com/uncategorized/9...r-competition/

Like this, they claim their competition 115 grain ammunition gives better accuracy, but SNAPPIER recoil, while the 147 is softer shooting and more knockdown power.
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 10:36 PM   #11
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Knockdown power is about as cringe worthy of a term as you can get in this industry. When I see someone use it, I lose all respect for that organization.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is online now  
Old September 15, 2017, 10:54 PM   #12
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
Their words:
"This ultra -soft shooting 9mm load has been customized to bring the greatest knock down power and keep your sights dead on target. We built this load for use in competitions that require you to knock down steel and transition between targets with improved accuracy."
The jeest of the conversation being that some others do claim that the 115 grain feels snappier than the 147 grain.

Quote:
Knockdown power is about as cringe worthy of a term as you can get in this industry. When I see someone use it, I lose all respect for that organization.
What's wrong with claiming that the 147 grain will knock over STEEL PLATES better than their own 115 grain ammo? It's not like they are claiming "knock down power" in defense ammo!
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"

Last edited by HighValleyRanch; September 15, 2017 at 11:20 PM.
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 15, 2017, 11:31 PM   #13
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
I've never personally felt that 115 gr is snappier than 147 gr. To me that's somewhat subjective.

Quote:
It's not like they are claiming "knock down power" in defense ammo!
Fair enough that's my fault for not reading closely. I got "triggered", pun intended. I do think saying that something is ultra soft shooting but has the most knockdown power is a bit contradictory. Likely they mean the most power for a given recoil sensation, but there's no free lunch when it comes to physics.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is online now  
Old September 16, 2017, 08:18 AM   #14
P-990
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2002
Location: Only1/2WayThere
Posts: 1,316
HVR,

To answer your hypothetical, theoretically in firearms of equal weight, firing the same bullet weight at the same speed will produce similar felt recoil, pending gross differences in things like powder charge weight.

However, back to the points the other posters have made, at handgun speeds, the question is to what end? Handguns, even the 5.7, don't offer enough velocity to cause fragmentation, temporary cavitation, or dramatic bullet yaw. What you're ultimately left with is a long-range drill press that just pokes holes in things. And just like a drill press, a bigger bit (bullet) puts bigger holes in things.

As pointed out, the 5.7 is designed to defeat soft body armor as a military personal defense arm. Out of something like a P90, with controllable automatic fire capability, it would be quite useful in a close range situation. Though from what I've read, people who have USED the 5.7 out of the carbine suggest it's really only effective because you CAN put a bunch of bullets on target quickly. Reduce the velocity, take away the full auto capability and I'm not sure the real-world effectiveness is as impressive as the gel results.

Now if my choice is between the Five-seveN and a Glock 17, I'd take the Glock with 5-6 magazines, a case of ammo, a holster, and go shoot happy.
__________________
NRA Master, Highpower Rifle, Across-the-Course
NRA Expert, Highpower Rifle, Mid-Range Prone
P-990 is offline  
Old September 16, 2017, 08:47 AM   #15
Chui
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 1,784
Look at ballistics gelatin results.

5.7 makes NO SENSE as a personal defense round when compared to 9mm.

9mm for the win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chui is offline  
Old September 16, 2017, 08:48 AM   #16
Chui
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighValleyRanch View Post
https://asymammo.com/uncategorized/9...r-competition/



Like this, they claim their competition 115 grain ammunition gives better accuracy, but SNAPPIER recoil, while the 147 is softer shooting and more knockdown power.


No such thing as "knockdown power". Bullets don't knock people over. Not off the big screen at least.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chui is offline  
Old September 16, 2017, 09:21 AM   #17
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
Quote:
No such thing as "knockdown power". Bullets don't knock people over. Not off the big screen at least.
LOL, I guess another poster that jumped the trigger.
Read the fifth post above.
" We built this load for use in competitions that require you to knock down steel ":

Quote:
5.7 makes NO SENSE as a personal defense round when compared to 9mm.
More a hypothetical question than......comparison of defense use

I guess people don't read carefully

THANK YOU P-990 for staying on topic and seeing that my question is hypothetical. I was wondering more for range practice for a low recoiling 9mm I could go with a very light bullet and higher velocity powder charge to get the same effect as a light snappy 5.7 round. No interest in the defense aspect of it. More for fun and shooting at steel.
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"

Last edited by HighValleyRanch; September 16, 2017 at 09:34 AM.
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 04:39 AM   #18
kozak6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
Do you find 9mm recoil to be particularly excessive? Considering the primary intent of range use, I wonder if a .22 might be more suitable.

The Five-Seven is curiously expensive. A better comparison might be a Five Seven vs two or three Glock 17's.

Quote:
To answer your hypothetical, theoretically in firearms of equal weight, firing the same bullet weight at the same speed will produce similar felt recoil, pending gross differences in things like powder charge weight.

However, back to the points the other posters have made, at handgun speeds, the question is to what end?
Yes and yes. Conservation of momentum and such.

The problem is that 50 grains is horrifically underweight for a 9mm load. To get there, you either need a prefragmented round (Magsafe), or some other silly gimmick (Liberty whatever).

In gel tests, such rounds tend to offer a very short, very messy wound channels. In more realistic tests, it's not unknown for these rounds to fail to expand and penetrate like a lightweight FMJ.

However, a paper target will never know the difference. In that case, does a cheap FMJ truly offer excessive recoil? Novelty rounds like Magsafes and such also tend to be prohibitively expensive for range use.

Without going as far as calculating impulse or free recoil energy, comparing the momentum of the rounds is a super fast calculation and can give you a fair idea of relative recoil.
kozak6 is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 05:01 AM   #19
Prndll
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 123
I could be wrong but isn't this supposed to be an advantage to the Ruger ARX rounds?
Prndll is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 05:38 AM   #20
Rob228
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
On a dueling tree at 15 yards I had to shoot far fewer plates twice with a 230 grain .45 moving at about 750 fps than I did with a 115 grain 9mm moving at about 1100. I don't think you'll get what you are looking for out of a fast moving 9 at 50 grains.
Rob228 is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 06:40 PM   #21
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
I have a five seven. It feels like shooting a 22 mag. It makes a mess of ballistic gellatin. The ballistic tip ammo that is not supposed to penetrate body armor in fact blows through level 2a. We took some 2a vest panels to the pd range and shot through them like paper with the non a.p. ammo.
reynolds357 is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 07:49 PM   #22
HighValleyRanch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2005
Posts: 4,063
Yeah, I just watch a video where the guy compared the Keltec PMR30 to the FN 5.7 by shooting at body armor level 2 over a gel torso. The .22 mag almost made it out of the vest!
__________________
From the sweet grass to the slaughter house; From birth until death; We travel between these two eternities........from 'Broken Trail"
HighValleyRanch is offline  
Old September 17, 2017, 08:20 PM   #23
Danoobie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 27, 2017
Posts: 351
+P loadings are going to tend to work over your pistol. The
5.7 is designed to shoot that velocity with standard FN rounds.

The 11 folks who took CBM hits from a 5.7 , at the Fort Hood
Massacre might have something to say about
the effectiveness of the round. Oh, wait, no, er, THEY ALL DIED.

But it doesn't really seem fair to try to compare any pistol to one
that costs 3 times as much, and is built by FN. I guess you don't
lose much, if you run hot loads thru the cheaper gun, if it makes
you feel better. Just wear the proper safety equipment. Polymer
guns have a way of cracking under heightened stress.

Last edited by Danoobie; September 17, 2017 at 08:34 PM.
Danoobie is offline  
Old September 18, 2017, 05:15 AM   #24
Kvon2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2016
Posts: 757
I think the title of the post might be why people are a bit off topic
Kvon2 is offline  
Old September 18, 2017, 12:32 PM   #25
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
Quote:
I have a five seven. It feels like shooting a 22 mag.
Because, it basically is a .22Mag. about 200fps or so faster.

Quote:
So the stats for some Amercian eagle 5.7 40 grain ammo is 1655 fps with 243 ft. pounds ME.
Ballistics by the Inch shows .22 Mag loads from a 5" barrel giving 1474s fps with a 40gr and 1672 and 1723fps for a couple of 30gr loads.

I couldn't find any short barrel data for the .22 Hornet, but from a 10" barrel it moves a 40gr at 2400fps. Now, think about that...the Hornet, from a 5" barrel would still be moving pretty quick, probably a bit faster than the 5.7mm, certainly no slower.

Who recommends the .22 Hornet for self defense???

(waits while listening to the crickets chirp......)

NO ONE.

Quote:
The 11 folks who took CBM hits from a 5.7 , at the Fort Hood
Massacre might have something to say about
the effectiveness of the round. Oh, wait, no, er, THEY ALL DIED.
While the victims did die, as an argument for the effectiveness of the 5.7 round, this is BS.

Ask any of the uncountable thousands of people who have been shot with a .22 rimfire, and died, about the "effectiveness" of those rounds.

Given the choice, I always opt for the broadsword, over the icepick.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12389 seconds with 8 queries