|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 3, 2010, 12:32 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Vernors and orange barrels.
Posts: 661
|
#4 buck is fine but as small as I'd go. I would not suggest bird shot at all for defense. But that's a given.
|
September 3, 2010, 01:42 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 1,654
|
Cylinder Bore 00B buckshot out of an 18" barrel at 7yds. has about a 5"-8" spread. That is depending of deformation of pellets and such. Some loads dont pattern well.
|
September 4, 2010, 02:50 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Posts: 194
|
Law enforcement considers the 2&3/4 low recoil buckshot to be adequate and they are much more likely to deal with drugged up maniacs than you. The important question that no one has asked you is if you live alone or is there a wife or gf that might need to use that shotgun for self defense when you are not there? How about a teenage son or daughter? The monster shells are definitely too much for them.
|
September 8, 2010, 03:29 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 352
|
After reading this thread I had to wonder how lucky our grandfathers were to have killed so many beast, fowl, and men with the measely 2.75"
Seriously...as a police firearms instructor I can wholeheartedly endorse the Low-recoil self defense loads being marketed today as absolutely effective and adequate. |
September 8, 2010, 05:46 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: May 25, 2010
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 82
|
Would you rather be shot with 2.75 or 3"??? The answer: Neither. Trust the copper ( I was one as well). The biggest consideration should be who will you hit if the round penetrates the wall into your kids bedroom.
Bottom line, if you shoot a mope with a shotgun he's gonna stop doing whatever it was that honked you off. Use the lightest load you can so it wont go through a wall. It WILL provide all the defense you"ll need. Shoes
__________________
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson |
September 8, 2010, 06:48 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
Not saying you shouldn't use lighter loads, just that there's a trade off you need to consider that all the advice about small buckshot or even birdshot doesn't address. Yes, at typical home defense ranges where Bubba isn't hiding behind some heavy furniture, smaller shot works fine before it has a chance to spread out. If Bubba (and his friends) are behind cover, the smaller shot may not provide "all the defense you'll need". Usually? Yes. Always? NO. The safest loads for HD are ones that wouldn't penetrate anything. The most effective loads can penetrate walls. Your call. Just my thoughts on the matter. |
|
September 8, 2010, 11:10 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2009
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
|
|
September 9, 2010, 01:26 AM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
Sorry to hear that you feel I'd be doing something wrong by eliminating a threat, in my own home, who's behind tactically advantageous cover from which he can kill me. In any event, I think 00 buck can eliminate that advantage better than birdshot. A re-evaluation of your statement might be in order. Just my thoughts on the matter. Last edited by Nnobby45; September 9, 2010 at 01:50 AM. |
|
September 9, 2010, 08:27 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 5, 2010
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
|
|
September 9, 2010, 09:36 AM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: January 6, 2010
Posts: 24
|
My hunting shotgun (and which served as my HD weapon of choice until I picked up the Glock) is a Benelli Supernova, which will take a round up to 3 1/2"
Whilst it served as my HD weapon I did have 5x3.5" 00 bucks ready, but with hindsight they were too impractical for all the reasons cited above. It has a huge amount of wallop. I used my stock 10 rounds up and haven't restocked. Also, a shotty that will take 3.5" shells won't be a gating factor in any future shotgun purchase - I don't hunt anything big enough that I need shells that big, and if I do revert back to the shotgun for HD purposes I'll be using 2 3/4" shells. Also for what it's worth I probably wouldn't get another Benelli Supernova for hunting- heavy sonofagun. But thats for another thread |
September 9, 2010, 09:38 AM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,473
|
power
Quote:
+1. Good to read that. The only thing "more powerful" about a 3 1/2" shell is that it has more pellets in it. Each pellet has the same energy as a pellet fired from a 2 3/4" shell. In fact, 3 1/2" buckshot loads evidently operate at about 200 fps slower than 2 3/4" loads. If part of the idea is that the 3.5 incher would be more useful against a bad guy under cover, you should rethink that. Out in the open, there's a greater chance that there might be more hits per shot and, thus, more energy per shot but at in home distances, you are looking at a pattern about ten inches wide at best - 18 pellets/9 pellets of 00. I suspect that nine will do the job decisively. Pete
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ... NRA Life Member |
|
September 9, 2010, 09:40 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,996
|
Remington makes 3.5 Mag in 00 and 000 buck.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR HD UNLESS YOU'RE EXPECTING T-1000 TERMINATORS AT YOUR DOOR!!!!!! The recoil is waaayyy too heavy for HD. It's basically overkill.
__________________
Krav Maga/Judo Qualified Rifleman/Marksmanship Instructor/Lic. Medic "There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit" Romans 8:1 |
September 9, 2010, 09:49 AM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Shotguns won't kill terminators. The low recoil 00 or slugs are easy to shoot.
I'd like someone to show where they didn't do the job as compared to a 3.5 load. t-test - anybody?
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
September 9, 2010, 03:59 PM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
It gets confusing, though. The short magnum crams more shot into the case and results in less velocity. You can't get the heavier charge going as fast as the lighter one. Magnum means more shot. Powder charge is reduced since the extra weight creates more resistance and therefore pressure. Or, the factory can use a different powder. In the 3" or 3 1/2", Magnum applies both to the increased case capacity AND the larger shot charge it will accomodate. The increased capacity allows the velocity to be maintained compared to the 2 3/4" case with similar pressures. If you increase the shot charge in the Magnum case, velocity still drops compared to the lighter charge. In any event, the factory that produces the ammo has it worked out thru testing. And they have special powders they've blended to accomplish what they need that aren't available to the handloader. Last edited by Nnobby45; September 9, 2010 at 04:23 PM. |
|
September 9, 2010, 04:31 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2009
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
The key is always to know your backstop, and if you're in a situation where you can't control what's behind your target, then select an appropriate shot size. |
|
September 9, 2010, 04:35 PM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: May 25, 2010
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 82
|
My point was, if you hit anyone with a shotgun, no matter what the load, they are hit. Average intruder wants money or valuables, and NOT being detected while doing so. Rarely, is there a gunfight, ie: hiding behind furniture, involved with these types of home invasions.
In short, shoot, or shoot at, a scumbag with a shotgun and you'll have him wishing he were anywhere other than in your home. I also suspect he'll be unassing the area with great haste. If you can acomplish this with the least amount of damage or penetration to anything or anyone else your gold is achived. Any guy that sticks around after that - continue to shoot hium until the desired effect is achived.
__________________
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson |
September 9, 2010, 04:42 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 820
|
I've never been shot by birdshot, but I imagine it would feel like getting stung by 100 hornets all at once, unless the distance was point blank in which case it is like getting shot by a slug.
|
September 9, 2010, 07:08 PM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2009
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
|
|
September 9, 2010, 08:23 PM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: May 25, 2010
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 82
|
I'm convinced I'm full of crap.... I thought about the longest hallway in my house and thought that this would be the longest "gunfight" I would have to defend against. Then I thought, "I'd hate to be tore up by birdshot at 17 feet". And it probably wont do any collateral damage.
Yep, I'm full of it...... Shoes
__________________
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson |
September 10, 2010, 03:59 PM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
__________________
I have rounds yet to fire before I sleep ... |
|
September 10, 2010, 04:18 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
September 10, 2010, 04:34 PM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Quote:
|
|
September 16, 2010, 04:17 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Location: OOOOOOOOOOO-Klahoma!
Posts: 403
|
Quote:
|
|
September 16, 2010, 11:25 PM | #49 | |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Quote:
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
|
September 17, 2010, 08:16 AM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Some experts claim control of the shotgun is far more important than it's power. I have read (might have been by Moosad, but not sure) that a 20 ga. is more effective than a 12 because it can be brought back on target much quicker.
|
|
|