|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 16, 2015, 02:07 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,804
|
On the Road?
http://www.technomadia.com/2012/07/c...ng-and-voting/
Quote:
|
|
July 16, 2015, 03:08 PM | #27 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 24, 2015
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
But what happens if you move? The form no longer has your actual adress, a trace request can't be completed. |
|
July 16, 2015, 03:12 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2015
Posts: 109
|
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-...state-purchase
"If a person maintains a home in 2 States and resides in both States for certain periods of the year, he or she may, during the period of time the person actually resides in a particular State, purchase a handgun in that State.” Military are not noted as exceptions to that statement that I can see- and most of them have some kind of “home” they will visit when they have leave, be it their own home they own or rent or that of a parent or family member where they live when they are in the state. There are many documents that state that active military are residents of the state where they’re stationed, but none that say their military status renders their home state residency invalid. Military personnel who are from (for example) WA and are stationed in GA can buy a gun in WA using their valid WA driver’s license when they are home, assuming they do “maintain a home” there. That same person can also buy a gun in GA when they are back, using their orders and military ID. With reciprocity between many states, it wouldn’t be an issue a lot of the time anyway for long gun purchases. Basically, if you can legally buy the gun in either your home state or the state you are in, the sale is legal. That said, many establishments will not make the sale anyway, just to be cautious. There are some exceptions (for some example, I think there are states where you can only purchase in your own state or one bordering it). Hand guns are different though- for the most part you can only buy one in the state you are a legal resident of. |
July 16, 2015, 07:17 PM | #29 | ||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,073
|
Quote:
You need to read the instructions on the Form 4473 for Que.2 and Que. 13. What state a member of the Armed Services considers as his "home state" is immaterial. "Home state" has absolutely nothing to do with state of residence or the buyers actual residence address. Quote:
Quote:
The information given on the 4473 is certified under penalty of law that it was true, correct and complete on the day it was signed by the buyer/transferee. If you moved the next day......nothing happens. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You are giving out a lot of very bad information. You should stop posting until you have read a bit more on ATF regs and Federal law.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE Last edited by dogtown tom; July 16, 2015 at 07:29 PM. |
||||||||
July 16, 2015, 10:12 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2014
Posts: 163
|
are your folks still alive? I would have used their address as my last abode.
They probably know where you are from time to time. |
July 16, 2015, 10:21 PM | #31 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Your last abode is irrelevant. What matters is your current State of residence as the term is defined in ATF regulations. See post 5.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
July 16, 2015, 11:15 PM | #32 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
ATF says Quote:
BATF could have added 'and also is a resident of his/her claimed home of record'. They did not. I think they should have done so. But the BATF did not consult me.
__________________
Last edited by Librarian; July 17, 2015 at 06:01 AM. |
||
July 17, 2015, 12:14 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
Librarian,
Does the description contained in this letter still reflect the BATFE's interpretation of military residency? https://www.atf.gov/file/56416/download |
July 17, 2015, 04:40 AM | #34 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 24, 2015
Posts: 112
|
|
July 17, 2015, 05:56 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 193
|
Yes, that 2004 letter repeats what is in the other references.
Quote:
__________________
|
|
July 17, 2015, 03:47 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2014
Posts: 394
|
This seems unconstitutional and you might be in a good position to act as a test case, OP. This is certainly unequal treatment under the law if only wealthy landowners are permitted to own firearms.
|
July 17, 2015, 05:29 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,073
|
Quote:
There is no requirement to own land or be wealthy.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
July 17, 2015, 11:47 PM | #38 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
Who is being subjected to unequal treatment under the law? How? |
|
July 17, 2015, 11:55 PM | #39 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 24, 2015
Posts: 112
|
|
July 18, 2015, 06:28 AM | #40 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
I understand the OP's dissatisfaction with the situation. On the face, it certainly presents a problem for people with no fixed abode.
However, people are trying to find exceptions or ways around the problem. There doesn't appear to be one.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
July 18, 2015, 06:47 AM | #41 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 24, 2015
Posts: 112
|
I could probably use my sister's address since she has a house in my state of residence, but there again I don't live there.
|
July 18, 2015, 09:54 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
|
I'm now nomadic too. For all intents and purposes I'm living in an 18-wheeler.
...and I plan on upgrading to something that is basically a small RV with a big engine. I'm out 28 days at a time, with my wife. We're thinking of just ditching the apartment. Yes...a lot of changes in my life. Among other things I'm now Jim Simpson, I took her last name...
__________________
Jim March Last edited by Tom Servo; July 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Image copyrights |
July 18, 2015, 10:00 AM | #43 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 24, 2015
Posts: 112
|
See I held on to my (very nice) apartment also, but it didn't make sense to keep paying rent on a place I rarely visited. I gave notice, paid an early termination fee and dropped it, saving all that money.
If you do that, then you need to use either a friend or family member's address, or something like a UPS store, and also buy a **noterized** "afidavit of residency" from any UPS store or lawyer (very cheep) and bring it with you to your DMV to have the new adress put on your license. If you use something like a UPS store, take my advice and leave your box # off your drivers licence. The store will still get your mail to you, your address will look more ordinary, and many companies like GEICO cannot accommodate irregular adress formats, resulting in wrong printed adresses and/or lost mail. Just leave the box # off. Last edited by Tom Servo; July 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Reference to deleted material |
July 18, 2015, 11:53 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
The letter to FFLs mentioned in post 20:
https://www.atf.gov/file/60941/download describes how to get a variance from the ATF for people who legitimately don't have a conventional address and are using a PO Box (or in the OP's case a UPS box) as a legal address. So, for the third and final time, I'm going to suggest that the OP contact ATF and start the procedure. Note to the OP: If you do get a variance, it's not going to do you any good unless the dealer is in the same state as your legal address. You can't currently buy a handgun in another state in any case. |
July 18, 2015, 05:33 PM | #45 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Going around in circles
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
|
|