|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9, 2011, 05:40 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
|
Powders Need Names Instead of Numbers
When I got into reloading it took me years to finally get straight what pistol powders I needed of a certain brand. Still, in rifle calibers I haven't a clue what powder numbers are for what calibers. IMR powders are the worst in this regard. Great powders but going in a store, a green horn reloader is lost.
The powder brands that have names for their powders make it sooo much simpler. |
April 9, 2011, 06:11 PM | #2 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I'm not sure why is would be simpler... it's not like they name them "IMR .30-06".
I was not aware that certain powders were for certain cartridges, with a few exceptions. What name would give to Win748? It works well in cartridges from .204Ruger to 7mm-08 and more. It seems to me that almost all powders, both rifle and handgun, overlap in their effectiveness to such a degree that any "purpose" naming scheme would be totally impractical, if not impossible.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
April 9, 2011, 06:16 PM | #3 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,247
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sarcasm, one of my passions.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
|||
April 9, 2011, 06:21 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
|
I think the parisite has a point. Powders having names like Retumbo, Varget, LilGun, Benchmark, Trailboss, Blue Dot etc. that give them a distinct identiity are a lot less confusing than IMR 4895, H-4895 and the like.
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals. Are you ready for civil war? |
April 9, 2011, 06:37 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2001
Location: southeastern wisconsin
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
|
|
April 9, 2011, 06:51 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,453
|
Based on gunboard posts, the most confusing powders in the market are in the Hodgdon Clays series. The existence of Clays, International Clays, and Universal Clays seems to be a challenge to the comprehension, literacy, and memory of more reloaders than the numbered products.
|
April 9, 2011, 06:57 PM | #7 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
|
|
April 9, 2011, 08:26 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
|
And, of course, there are SR-4759 and SR-4756, which apparently are too close NUMERICALLY for some people to discern the difference. And one is an extruded rifle powder while the other is a flake shotgun/pistol powder, so they don't LOOK anything like each other.
If Parisite really wants to have a clue, I suggest that he get and read a few reloading manuals. There is more to reloading than the powder manufacturers are going to be able to squeeze onto the label on a container of powder. SL1 |
April 9, 2011, 11:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 610
|
All of my manuals seem pretty clear on this. Not sure how one could be confused on what powders are which. Many years ago maybe things were different, but now the hobby of reloading is an open book test (literally).
|
April 9, 2011, 11:33 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 6, 2010
Posts: 28
|
I say we start a petition. Let's get IMR4895 renamed to Ratumbo, and H4895 renamed to Rotumbo. Retumbo can stay as is. That will eliminate some confusion.
|
April 10, 2011, 12:58 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2002
Location: Transplanted from Montana
Posts: 2,311
|
I do believe this is all RetroDumbo MuboJubo.
The whole problem would be moot if if we gave a hoot and applied our boot to the novice's patoot, and forced their snoot in a manual, as this old coot in his zoot suite, advises the root to reloading loot is reading and understanding, before buying powder.
__________________
I pledge allegiance to the Flag - - -, and to the Republic for which it stands….Our Forefathers were brilliant for giving us a Republic, not a democracy! Do you know the difference??? and WHY?http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissue...les.asp?id=111 |
April 10, 2011, 03:52 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2011
Posts: 207
|
go to IMR's website and click on reloading data and it will give u IRM Hodgon and Winchester load data for what ever round you want. It will give you several different powders for a round but not all are listed for every bullet weight. Gives you min and max with speeds and pressures. Its what I used as a newbie along with this site.
|
April 10, 2011, 05:30 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 1999
Location: Too close to Houston
Posts: 4,196
|
It's really simple since the 4895's are so similar and essentially the same as the 2495. No wait, never mind....
Names, numbers, it really doesn't matter as long as you take care to put the right one on the bench and then put it away before you get another one out. Manuals can be confusing too, particularly when they just say "Universal" and the powder can says "Universal Clays" with the Clays part being emphasized.
__________________
Proud member of the NRA and Texas State Rifle Association. Registered and active voter. |
April 10, 2011, 06:58 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
|
If I had to use one powder for everything, it would be Unique. Rifle, pistol, shotgun, you can do it all with Unique. It's certainly not the best powder for every application, but it is unique in that it is so versatile.
And, no numbers to remember. |
April 10, 2011, 07:06 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: August 25, 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 82
|
Why change?
The people that are confused will still be confused. Here in Minnesota we have an International airport with "2" terminals. One was the Humphery terminal and the other was the Lindberg terminal. Those name were some how confusing to people and they couldn't keep them straight. The fine people of Minnesota under some very misguided leaders had to spend millions upon millions upon millions of dollars to change the names and signage around the airports to terminal "1" and terminal "2". Bottom line, the people STILL don't know were they are going. If you don't know what you are using the name won't make a difference.
__________________
The wants of the many DO NOT outweigh my needs. |
April 10, 2011, 07:39 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,157
|
It seems to me a first step would be reading a load manual that incorporates many different loads for many cartridges.
Many of those books have a powder chart in burn rate order for both rifle and handgun. Once you have looked at the possible loads for your application, then go shopping for components. It would not be my choice to just buy a bunch of components and then hope for the best. Geetarman |
April 10, 2011, 08:03 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,258
|
I don't get it. How are you confused by the name W748 but know exactly what calibers the powder is good for just by seeing WST, Bullseye or Titegroup.
__________________
I don't ever remember being absent minded. |
April 10, 2011, 08:19 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: West Central Missouri
Posts: 2,592
|
I agree with Jim Watson on the Clay line. When I started out (When things were hard to find) I stumbled across some Universal.
I had read references to Clays and Clays Universal (Also seen referenced as Universal Clays). There was no other experienced reloader to talk to and the guy at the shop where I got it was "Pretty Sure" they were interchangeable. I wrote to the company and either I was not clear in my question or the guy who answered me was just as confused, because he said they were interchangeable also. (I can not find the e-mail now, but I did post it here awhile back.) I still felt there was something wrong with the answer I got from the company and the guys here on the board cleared it up. I prefer the number system simply because it is hard to screw up a number. I was doing things bass ackwards before. Buying powder and then looking for loads. I have sense learned to look for loads first and then buy the powder.
__________________
Inside Every Bright Idea Is The 50% Probability Of A Disaster Waiting To Happen. |
April 10, 2011, 12:57 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
I would like each powder to have it's own container shape.
LIL'GUN and LONGSHOT should not have the same shape. I'm not going to make THAT mistake again I think W231 should look like Shirley Temple and Re22 should look like Max Von Sydow.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
April 10, 2011, 01:55 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2005
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 2,000
|
Good idea, all the flake powder canisters could be shaped like Obama with big ears hanging off the sides.
__________________
,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 my wife in a discussion about Liberals. Are you ready for civil war? |
April 10, 2011, 02:20 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
|
Powder names are like cartridge names, confusing......but like a cartridge, once you find a powder you like, it's hard to forget the name.
|
April 10, 2011, 03:09 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,033
|
Flashhole has the best idea I've heard all day.
It took me quite a while to understand the differences in Clays, Universal Clays, and International Clays. Uh, there IS a difference, isn't there? |
April 10, 2011, 03:17 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
|
Powders all have names. Many of the names have numbers in them. If the names (letters/numbers) are different, on different cans, the powders in those cans are DIFFERENT.
|
April 10, 2011, 04:10 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Posts: 1,204
|
Before responding to this post I went to my garage and took a look at my growing collection of reloading powers. Hodgdon includes reloading data for various rifle calibers on the front of its containers. At the bottom of the label of Reloader powders it will say " Powder of choice" for a given caliber. IMR on the other hand doesn't provide any data.
|
April 10, 2011, 04:24 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
They do have names. IMR3031 is named: "IMR3031". Lil'Gun is named: "Lil'Gun". IMR4895 is named: "IMR4895", etc.
Just stop thinking of them as "numbers". 101 Airborne does not mean that there are 101 airborne units (there are only two...the 82nd and the 101), it is their name. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|