The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 15, 2017, 11:26 AM   #1
Roland Thunder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
Load recipe for 45acp 200gr LSWC and AA#2

I just bought some AA#2. Hadn't had any in a long time. I used to use it for 9mm but now I want to try to come up with a 45acp load for 200gr LSWC's. I would be using it in my Colt 1911 Government Model. The Accurate website is showing a starting load of 5.1gr and a max of 6.0gr. However, my Colt 1911 has a lighter recoil spring and normally shoots 3.8gr of Bullseye without any FTE issues so I figure I can start lower than 5.1 gr of #2.

Any ideas?
__________________
Do not follow where the path may lead, go, instead where there is no path and leave a trail - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Roland Thunder is offline  
Old July 17, 2017, 05:45 PM   #2
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
Quote:
so I figure I can start lower than 5.1 gr of #2.
You can indeed.

What you are - in essence - doing, is a load "workdown," as opposed to a load workup.

And like a load workup, you should at least start with published data. In this case 5.1 grains.

From there, you can move down in 0.2gn increments or whatever. The concern here is a stuck bullet; so make sure you're seeing your projectile impact the target, or the berm behind, etc. I recommend a chronograph for testing these. For me, with lead bullets, I start getting nervy of the possibility of a stuck bullet when velocities drop below 600 f/s (700 f/s for plated or jacketed).

I load a lot of 200 LSWC's. And I have a Colt 1911 with a lighter recoil spring (12#) that only shoots lightly loaded 200 LSWC's these days (I use the ultra-fast AA Nitro-100 @ 650 f/s for these).

I have loaded with AA#2 quite a bit (great stuff). But I was surprised to check my load data just now to find I have never loaded 200 LSWC's with AA#2. So I have no personal experience data for you

Speaking of AA#2: It'll definitely work for your application. But I will say that is it has a bit of "slowness" to it for a fast propellant. As mentioned above, I haven't loaded with it for 45 ACP. But I have tested it extensively with low-power target ammo in 38 Special. If it behaves in 45 like it does in 38 (and I suspect it will), you'll find a good deal of chartreuse colored grainy propellant by-product left behind. It's not a big deal, unless it bothers you to know it's not running at optimum. What is really spectacular is how consistent my results were while it was running in this low-pressure non-optimum condition. Like I said, AA#2 is great stuff - even when it's not running at optimum.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old July 17, 2017, 09:22 PM   #3
Roland Thunder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_C_S
You can indeed.

What you are - in essence - doing, is a load "workdown," as opposed to a load workup.
I ended up using 4.7gr of AA#2 and it shoots and cycles very nicely with that. I also have a 12# spring in my 1911.
__________________
Do not follow where the path may lead, go, instead where there is no path and leave a trail - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Roland Thunder is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05736 seconds with 10 queries