|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 27, 2013, 09:17 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Bill to change CC regulations passes TX legislature
Good news for our friends in Texas, the state legislature has passed a bill removing the odd revolver/semi-auto qualification requirement for a TX CCL.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...s-to-governor/ The article says that the bill is now on its way to Gov Perry, anyone from Texas care to weigh in on the chances that he will sign or veto it? |
May 27, 2013, 10:28 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
I expect that he would sign it. He is strong 2A.
The article is not exactly correct. If a person qualifies with a revolver they can only carry a revolver. If they qualify with a semiauto they can carry either a semi or revolver. Actually the licenses are marked SA (for semiautomatic) or NSA ( for non-semiautomatic). I am not sure if someone wanted to CC a single shot or lever action. I guess it would be NSA. Not sure why anyone would want to CC either of those two types, but who knows about some people? At lease that is the way it was when I got my license.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
May 27, 2013, 11:34 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Here's a summary page on TX bills:
https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.c...-status-report Some good things were passed. I regret that campus carry died. A different strategy is needed as this has happened before.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 27, 2013, 12:07 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Originally posted by KMAX
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
May 27, 2013, 12:51 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
He said he was in favor but did little to get the bill to the floor. I'm not an expert on the Senate rules but I think the TSRA hinted he could use emergency agenda powers to do this and was asked the last time.
He didn't but did but some other stuff on the agenda that seemingly wasn't so important. The opposition from the UT regents is not to be discounted as a power factor in this. That plus antigun folks and the rules, does campus carry in. It might have more luck if they just had a bill that would allow staff to carry as that would void the crazed frat boy objection. Of course, it would discriminate against the older competent student. But UT worries about Alpha Shoota Banga members as compared to the Marine recon vet going to night school. However, allowing guns to be stored in cars is a step forward and will make some college administration plotz in their shorts.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 27, 2013, 05:03 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
I like the bills that say I will not be required to take a renewal course and lower the renewal fee for veterans. I also like the bill concerning unintentional display of ccw.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
May 27, 2013, 06:21 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Perry has extended the legislative session, the TX gun forums will be buzzing that more gun bills can be promoted. The session is for redistricting (give court edicts) - we will see if gun stuff comes up. I doubt it but could be wrong.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 27, 2013, 06:30 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I was also thinking that not needing to renew with a class and shortening the classes will be a significant hit on the CHL instructors who focus on the CHL process for income.
The well known and established tactical folks might be ok. But the renewals might bring in business for those.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 27, 2013, 06:49 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
Quote:
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
|
May 28, 2013, 06:45 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
|
I wrote an Email to the TX DPS asking whether "Maurice the FrankenRuger" qualified as a revolver or semi-auto for purposes of this TX CCW system.
I explained that I built it and that it is the only mag-fed auto-shell-ejecting wheelgun that takes standard ammo (9mm up to +P+). I linked them to the video. They told me to ask a gun dealer which type it is. I mean yeah, mainly I was screwing with 'em but it does point out that there are edge cases where it might be tricky to tell...like the Matebas and Webley-Foster autocockers for example...
__________________
Jim March |
May 28, 2013, 03:26 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I would encourage Texans to read Mr. Cotton's fine letter to Gov. Perry on this site:
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtop...?f=125&t=66535 Then, you can follow his suggestions to endorse his views about the Governor allow important bills actually to come to a vote. Glenn
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 30, 2013, 08:51 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Glenn, thanks for posting that link. What an articulate, thoughtful missive and I hope Governor Perry will give it the consideration it deserves.
|
May 30, 2013, 09:59 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I'm not that hopeful about that. Sigh - he has had chances to be interventionist in past sessions and didn't step up. The TSRA has to step carefully around him but have hinted at some discontent with his actions.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 30, 2013, 11:56 AM | #14 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
I'm an NRA instructor and I teach pistol classes for the carry license in my state. I don't do it for the money. I don't own my own range, so I charge my students what the range charges me per student, plus (recently) a couple of bucks to pay for ammo ( or they can bring their own, but if I can't find any .22LR it's unlikely someone new to shooting will be able to). I want to get more people armed and educated. |
||
May 30, 2013, 12:07 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:18 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2013, 12:27 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
yes. It makes the Libertarian in me scream.
Having said that, I'm having difficulty finding what firerarms legislation was actually passed and signed at this point. Until all three occur legislation can just disappear. Its happened to us before. |
May 30, 2013, 12:38 PM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
Quote:
This general attitude could be extended to any service that we pay for and to any legal, governmental, or political service or agency. Quote:
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
||
May 30, 2013, 12:50 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30, 2013, 03:54 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,185
|
Quote:
It is not the instructors that should be considered the "vampires" but the state for requiring licensing and the $70 to $140 fee for the license. I have heard it said that "a free man doesn't need permission" which may be true ideologically, but there are certain realities in life such as taxes.
__________________
This is my gun. There are many like her, but this one is mine. I'm not old. I'm CLASSIC! |
|
May 30, 2013, 05:27 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Quote:
Should you, in order to exercise your fundamental 1st amendment rights, be required to obtain training (and certification thereof), and to that end pay what for some is a not-inconsiderable amount? |
|
May 30, 2013, 05:30 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
1. This is a thread to discuss TX legislation and the philosophical bases of classes in general is off topic.
2. For legislative updates - https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.c...-status-report www.texaschlforum.com has discussion of the issues.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
May 31, 2013, 11:07 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
|
Glen
Quote:
Why you ask? Because if you make training a PERSONAL responsibility, people will do what is necessary for them to be personally responsible gun owners. |
|
|
|