|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 30, 2006, 03:07 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,968
|
Update Form 4 ????????????
Several years ago, I bought a Taylor tube Sten MK.II. It was a real piece of crap. Using the sights it shot something like six feet to the left..................
I recently sent the gun to Don Quinnel who assembled a Sterling parts kit using my registered Sten tube thus making me a Stenling. Do I need to do anything with my Form 4 since it is marked "Sten Mk.II" (as well as my previous address) ? In other words does it need to say Sterling or Stenling on the Form 4 (not that most LEO would know the difference) ?
__________________
You know the rest. In the books you have read How the British Regulars fired and fled, How the farmers gave them ball for ball, From behind each fence and farmyard wall, Chasing the redcoats down the lane, Then crossing the fields to emerge again Under the trees at the turn of the road, And only pausing to fire and load. |
June 30, 2006, 03:16 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
I am not familiar with the sten or the sterling, but whatever the manufacturer of the regestered part is, that is still what the ATF considers to be the make of the weapon. ie; a Bushmaster with a Colt lower parts kit is still a Bushmaster.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
June 30, 2006, 03:24 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2006
Location: Amerika's Doyleland
Posts: 809
|
It's still considered a Sten as the tube is still original, and all stenlings are built off the sten tubes.
|
|
|