The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 12, 2017, 02:20 PM   #1
Wheeljack
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2017
Posts: 12
Powder for 9 mm 147gr loads

I've been using HP-38 with my Lee powder measure. With the heavy 147gr plated bullet I use, I think HS-6 is better but it leaks out of my Lee powder measure. So I guess a fine powder is not what I want. I'm thinking about WSF, the new Winchester 572, AA no.7 or Sport Pistol. The staggering amount of missing information is horrible. Contradictory information is not much better. So on my quest for the perfect powder for my 9mm, 147gr, plated loads, I seek your thoughts and insight. Thanks
Wheeljack is offline  
Old April 12, 2017, 03:06 PM   #2
ShootistPRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,583
A better powder measure might be your best choice. Using double based (ball) powders your measure might not be reliable. I would suggest the RCBS Uniflow measure as it is what I have used for the past 20 - 30 years. Before that I used the Lyman 55 measure and before that I used the Lee powder dippers and some custom dippers that I made.
ShootistPRS is offline  
Old April 12, 2017, 03:22 PM   #3
Dufus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
Try VV N340. If you like it as much as I do, then you are all set for a while.

I have tried prolly 10 different powders in the 9 and finally told myself this is the one.

A bonus is that it fills the case so no worries about double charge.
Dufus is offline  
Old April 12, 2017, 03:50 PM   #4
Wheeljack
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2017
Posts: 12
That sounds like good advice, and it is. But, I have put too much time into my Lee "Perfect" measure to give up just yet. I just honed the rotor surfaces to a better, smoother fit, I have adapted it to fit the flaring die so I can flare and charge the case with the same die and I added a second lever for better control. It will probably work pretty well with a finer powder now, but why take the chance. I don't have a "den" to do my reloading so I have to keep my work area clean. If it doesn't work out at least I have a place to look. Thanks
Wheeljack is offline  
Old April 12, 2017, 05:22 PM   #5
muncie21
Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 40
Here's some other choices.

muncie21 is offline  
Old April 14, 2017, 05:37 PM   #6
rock185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,093
Hello and welcome Wheeljack, Like Dufus, I have used a Bunch of powders in the 9. I'd have to go through many years of chronograph notes to even try to accurately list them all. I have used the ones you mentioned, other than 572 and Sport pistol. I think you should use whatever powder best produces the results you're trying to achieve. Hope that Lee "Perfect" powder measure does not continue to be an impediment. I was given a little Lee press and decided to use it for some of my real low volume reloading. Tried the "perfect" powder measure. An exercise in frustration. I switched to the Auto-Disk, which has worked better for me. Still very glad I Don't have to use the Lee stuff much. I used the RCBS powder measure for years before starting to use Dillon equipment. Don't know about current production, but my old RCBS measure worked flawlessly for years. BTW, I preferred the medium speed HS-6 over the faster HP-38 for my reloading too.
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life
rock185 is offline  
Old April 14, 2017, 07:10 PM   #7
Fine Figure of a Man
Member
 
Join Date: October 15, 2016
Posts: 64
I like VV340 a lot, just wish it wasn't so expensive.
Fine Figure of a Man is offline  
Old April 14, 2017, 11:18 PM   #8
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
AA#7.

The original powder was developed for use in Uzi 158 gr (not a typo on the weight) 9 mm ammo for use in the Uzi carbine. It works very well for the heavies and in my opinion is the best of the powders listed by the OP excluding the new ones that I haven't tried yet. There is a reason I buy 8 lb jugs of it.
SHR970 is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 01:59 AM   #9
ShootistPRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,583
Blue Dot, Power Pistol and Viht 3N37 are the top performers with AA #7 a very close second to 3N37. AA #7 is about the slowest powder useful with the Sierra 124 grain class bullets.
ShootistPRS is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 05:30 PM   #10
zeke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,671
Another AA-7 user for full power 147 jacketed 9mm loads. Prefer to use Fed 200 sp mag primers. However have never tried it with plated bullets.
zeke is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 05:50 PM   #11
PPGMD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Posts: 348
What are you using the loads for? Most competitive shooters use Titegroup or N320 with a 147gr bullet.
PPGMD is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 06:06 PM   #12
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
I use HP38 for all 9mm.

There is a lot of Titegroup burned even with heavy bullets.
There are some very strange things happening with PCCs, too.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old April 15, 2017, 10:02 PM   #13
PPGMD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Posts: 348
I'm using Autocomp and a 115gr bullet with my PCC.
PPGMD is offline  
Old April 16, 2017, 10:28 AM   #14
Wheeljack
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2017
Posts: 12
I'm not into competition at my age. I load for a number of guns from a revolver to a carbine. Looking for a powder for all of them. I also use it for SD loads. I like the way HP-38 flows in my Lee powder measure, but reading a lot of posts, it seems this powder is too fast for my 147gr plated bullets. From the reply's it looks like most reloaders agree. That said, I'm interested in looking at the new Win 572 as it is in that same burn rate area. Now that I have found a good load with my HP-38, it's time to try another powder and another challenge.
Wheeljack is offline  
Old April 16, 2017, 11:49 AM   #15
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
Heavy for caliber bullets do better with slower for caliber powders . I use WSF with my 147gr PLHP which works quite well . I also use HS.6 and CFE pistol . Any powders in those burn rates will be optimal when shooting 147gr bullets in 9mm

Burn rate chart
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/...rn-rate-chart/
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old April 16, 2017, 02:14 PM   #16
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
AA#7

Quote:
It (AA#7) works very well for the heavies and in my opinion is the best of the powders listed by the OP
When I read the title of the OP, AA#7 was the first propellant than popped in my head.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old April 16, 2017, 04:41 PM   #17
Wheeljack
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2017
Posts: 12
From all the info and my inclination, I'm going to try the Win 572, if I can find some. In the Hodgdon Burn Rate chart, 572, Blue Dot and AA #7 are listed numbers 50,51 and 52. It may be a while, but if I get to loading with the 572, I get back with my thought on the power. Thanks all.
Wheeljack is offline  
Old April 16, 2017, 05:17 PM   #18
skinnedknuckles
Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2015
Posts: 43
You might also take a look at Longshot. I've been pretty happy using it with 147gr plated RN bullets from X-treme. 4.5 gr of Longshot got me 950 fps from a Taurus PT-99 5" barrel. (Typical disclaimer about working up loads in your gun.)
skinnedknuckles is offline  
Old April 17, 2017, 12:30 PM   #19
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,288
So far I have been shooting cheapo whitebox 9mm from wally world.
I intend to load 147's.
Looking at the Hogdon site,top vel in posted loads is 1007 with max load of Longshot.
I understand other factors besides velocity come into play.

A significant difference in accuracy,burning dirty,finicky ignition,and blinding muzzle flash would all matter.

Any more feedback on Longshot?
HiBC is online now  
Old April 17, 2017, 01:39 PM   #20
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
Quote:
A significant difference in accuracy,burning dirty,finicky ignition,and blinding muzzle flash would all matter.
Yep you're going to get all that or at least there's a good chance of it with Longshot as well as a very loud report . IMO Longshot and the like may be a bit slow for the application . I have some but never tried it in the 9mm . Maybe I'll give it a go and see how it does with the 147gr pills . I would and do stick in the CFE , HS-6 burn rate area for the heavy 9mm bullets .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .
Metal god is offline  
Old April 17, 2017, 06:01 PM   #21
zeke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,671
Am using AA-7 for 357 mag, 9mm, .40 s@w and 45 acp. For heavier loads and jacketed hollow points. It does leave burned (yellow) grains behind but minimal carbon.
zeke is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06159 seconds with 10 queries