The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 25, 2020, 09:03 PM   #51
wild cat mccane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,624
HST is far better at expansion than what it replaced Hydra Shok that came out in 1988.

What is interesting about this is, Federal just released HST 380. Federal HST 380 wasn't reviewed as being super awesome like HST 9mm--with 9mm HST being the current gold standard in 9mm.

So why is Hydra Shok 380 being refined when Federal is way past Hydra Shok?


That is interesting.

Though, no comment on expansion. Just that it goes 13"

Last edited by wild cat mccane; January 25, 2020 at 09:10 PM.
wild cat mccane is offline  
Old January 25, 2020, 11:07 PM   #52
Forte S+W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2019
Posts: 819
Meh, I'll stick with Hornady American Gunner XTPs.

.380 ACP XTPs are proven performers which typically meet minimum FBI/IWBA requirements in Ballistics Gel Tests, even out of Pocket Pistols such as the Ruger LCP.

I imagine that the Federal Hydra Shok Deep is just Federal's answer to the Hornady XTP, a bullet with moderate expansion but deep penetration.
__________________
Conspiracy theorists are the greatest political spin-doctors of all time. Only they can make the absolute worst political blunders sound like spectacular feats of ingenuity.
Forte S+W is offline  
Old January 26, 2020, 04:12 AM   #53
Professor
Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2002
Posts: 22
In .380, I've settled on the Colt Pocketlite and FMJ ammo for reliability and penetration reasons. The Colt is a near perfect size and not a blowback.
Professor is offline  
Old January 26, 2020, 10:32 AM   #54
TBM900
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forte S+W View Post
.380 ACP XTPs are proven performers which typically meet minimum FBI/IWBA requirements in Ballistics Gel Tests, even out of Pocket Pistols such as the Ruger LCP.
Taken right from an advertisement...
And I'm sure they thank you for the plug, as well as for spending ~3x as much
__________________
Playboy billionaire
Retired Colonial Marine
1st to walk on the moon without a spacesuit
TBM900 is offline  
Old January 26, 2020, 10:37 AM   #55
TBM900
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2015
Posts: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor View Post
In .380, I've settled on the Colt Pocketlite and FMJ ammo for reliability and penetration reasons. The Colt is a near perfect size and not a blowback.
This is the correct answer for 380
I've yet to see a 380 load that reliably expanded and penetrated deep enough.
They all fall short, so better to spend that boutique money on more practice and full penetration.

Expansion is over-rated anyway...
Practice
Placement
Penetration
__________________
Playboy billionaire
Retired Colonial Marine
1st to walk on the moon without a spacesuit
TBM900 is offline  
Old January 26, 2020, 10:54 AM   #56
wild cat mccane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,624
I as wrong. Found expansion.

So it looks like this will likely be the new gold standard for LCP length barrels. Beats XTP in expansion and equals in penetration due to the conical spire in the middle.

HST does great in longer barrels.
wild cat mccane is offline  
Old January 28, 2020, 01:42 PM   #57
Ruger45LC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
I'll probably try some, I currently go between HST, Gold Dot or V Crown in my Glock 42. I'm not particularly fond of the 380 but the G42 shoots so good and it's accurate, plus I'm sure that if the bullet goes where it needs to, the 380 should work okay.
Ruger45LC is offline  
Old January 30, 2020, 07:03 PM   #58
Lavan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,716
If I were a mugger, I think I'd be willing to let the "mark" go if he handed me a nice 380.

Lavan is offline  
Old January 30, 2020, 08:04 PM   #59
KEYBEAR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,059
Over the years I have had a number of carry guns . For the last 10 years or so a 380 is the carry piece for me . I bought a new Sig Sauer P230 made in Germany and as a carry gun it is hard to beat .

It is all about the AMMO i found the right stuff . UNDERWOOD i have shot some of the 100gr. at 1200 fps i can tell you the bad will not like it .

Last edited by KEYBEAR; January 30, 2020 at 08:19 PM.
KEYBEAR is offline  
Old January 31, 2020, 01:30 PM   #60
Kevin Rohrer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2010
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,049
Federal has you covered. According to a recent press release, there's a New Hydra-Shok Deep in .380 ACP that exceeds the FBI minimum penetration distance in both bare ballistics gelatin and through denim. If the inability of .380 ACP to satisfy the FBI's penetration standard is what's been holding you back from carrying a smaller, lighter .380 pistol, this might be the solution.

And within the next 10-years, I expect their "testing" to confirm that the .380 is the ultimate police round, just as they did with the (in chronological order) with the .38spl, 357mag, 10mm, .40cal, and the current 9mm.

But just as from the beginning of the Bureau to now, their privileged groups will still carry a 1911 (or 2011) in .45ACP.
__________________
Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, ARTCA, and American Legion.

Caveat Emptor: Cavery Grips/AmericanGripz/Prestige Grips/Stealth Grips from Clayton, NC. He is a scammer
Kevin Rohrer is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06630 seconds with 10 queries