The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 6, 2023, 04:19 PM   #1
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
Anaconda rear sight elevation adjust?

Hello world! Does anybody know the rear sight elevation increments?

Meaning, I need to drop the elevation about 4 MOA. How many clicks would thaat equate to?

TNX
Dave
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old March 7, 2023, 02:59 PM   #2
Bob Wright
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
If I'm not mistaken, all iron sights are in one minute of angle adjustments. So that would equate to four clicks. However, my adjusting has been the old artillery way, double the calculated adjustments and further by "brackting." So, take eight clicks and adjust from there as required.

Bob Wright
__________________
Time spent at the reloading bench is an investment in contentment.
Bob Wright is offline  
Old March 8, 2023, 10:17 AM   #3
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
Well Bob, I decided to do the math, and measure r sight height with a caliper.

Bad news, was the rear sight was already bottomed out!

Maybe I will investigate the front sight. Thanks !
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old March 8, 2023, 03:11 PM   #4
44caliberkid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,104
Many feel the new Python/ Anaconda rear sights are crap. Wilson Combat is making new front and rear sights for them.

https://attackcopter.com/2022/11/18/...5%20USA%20Made
44caliberkid is offline  
Old March 8, 2023, 10:41 PM   #5
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
Just out of curiosity, what load are you shooting??
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old March 9, 2023, 05:25 PM   #6
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
Load Info: 20 gr of w296, topped with a 240 gr (I think) Keith semi-wad cuttter (lead). Looks like this is slightly less thaan recommended by Hogdon !

It is a peppy load!

I have no complaints on the factory sights. I use the revolver just for target/plinking. I searched for a taller front sight, but cant seem to find a suitable one, with no fiber optic in it.
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old March 9, 2023, 06:53 PM   #7
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
Here's some new front sights for the New Colt's...........

https://shop.harrisoncustom.com/hd-0...k-snake-sights

https://shopwilsoncombat.com/Colt-Py...products/1544/
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old March 11, 2023, 12:00 PM   #8
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
Thanks, Faris !
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old March 11, 2023, 01:19 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave P
Load Info: 20 gr of w296, topped with a 240 gr (I think) Keith semi-wad cuttter (lead). Looks like this is slightly less thaan recommended by Hogdon !
Where did you find a Hodgdon recommendation for that bullet? When I look at their on-line load data, the only load that comes up with a 240-grain bullet with Winchester 296 is for a Nosler jacketed hollow-point. And you haven't mention your C.O.L.

Based on that load (which, of course, doesn't apply because you are using a different bullet at an unknown seating depth), your 20 grains isn't "slightly less" than what Hodgdon suggests, it's quite a bit less. The suggested starting load from the on-line site is 23.0 grains, and the maximum is 24.0 grains. If those data could be applied directly to a different bullet, you would be 13% under the suggested starting load.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 12, 2023, 02:00 PM   #10
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
If possible, chronograph your load.

My old books show 20ish gr of 296 or H110 with a jacketed 240gr slug put you in the 1100fps range. And I don't think today's powder is quite the same as what was in the books 20-30 years ago...

The slower the bullet is, the higher on the target it will print. Sights scaled for full house loads may not have the adjustment for a light load, and that is what I think you are seeing here. Even if the load seems "peppy" to you.

Get your load clocked, and see what it really is doing. Once you know that, you can make informed decisions how to proceed.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06697 seconds with 10 queries