|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 11, 2020, 12:47 PM | #26 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
Are you suggesting a breechloader now?
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
February 11, 2020, 01:26 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
No, a muzzleloader with two superposed shots. Since there’s only two shots in the barrel, it allows the rear chamber to be smaller than the bore, since the rear ball isn’t inserted into the rear chamber itself but infront of it in the bore. The idea is that the recoil of the front load won’t compress the rear charge since the rear ball will be pushed against the face of the chamber, and the smaller chamber will also make for a better sealment, put a O-ring between the chamber face and the ball, and the ball will be compressed against it by the recoil of the front charge.
Last edited by Derringeer; February 11, 2020 at 02:52 PM. |
February 11, 2020, 02:11 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
Since the ball is round, a part of it will be inside of the chamber. If the chamber is too small, the rear part of the ball will get stuck into the chamber before it can reach the O-ring. The best option is that the ball rest against the O-ring while the rear part of it rest agaist the walls inside of the chamber.
There’s a mathematical calculation for this, but I don’t know how to approach it. Btw, other than roundballs, a Minié bullet could be inserted backwards at the rear and the skirt of the bullet should expand when the front charge is fired. But I’ll go with roundballs and O-rings to start with.. Another question is what material the O-ring should be made out of. Rubber or copper (or both)? Last edited by Derringeer; February 11, 2020 at 02:50 PM. |
February 11, 2020, 02:31 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Rubber against a powder charge won't last very long.
|
February 11, 2020, 02:31 PM | #30 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
Just go with the Belton. I never figured out how the trigger worked with a sliding lock. Better yet, the Lorenzoni. With modern EDM, you can get precision fit instead of hand fitting. Make the swivel portion out of bronze.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
February 11, 2020, 03:38 PM | #31 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
Quote:
It is a muzzle loader (in that the barrels are loaded from the muzzle) but YOU don't do it, its done at the factory, multiple projectiles and powder charges loaded into the barrel, and fired sequentially (electrically I believe). Multiple Barrels mounted in a "pack". Considered a crew served weapon, a modern improvement on the volley gun concept. (and, NOT black powder )
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
February 11, 2020, 04:31 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
I don’t know if the O-ring is necessary. The lead ball is soft and will deform into the chamber making a sealed fit.
I made a sketch where I included flour but maybe there’s something better than flour..? |
February 11, 2020, 05:17 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
If you're going to drive an over sized ball into the bore you're not going to get very many reloads if any unless you plan on swabbing the bore before you load it every time. Also pounding an over size ball and swabbing kinda makes the whole rapid fire thing moot because all you're going to get is two shots and you can do that more easily with another barrel.
|
February 11, 2020, 06:50 PM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
This gun will be a pain to reload, that’s for sure. The biggest reason why’s that is because I need to replace the igniters. My idea here is to have multiple barrels, with two superposed loads in each. Therefore four barrels gives eight shots, which is a big improvement in capacity compared to four shots.
In that sense it’s a rapid fire muzzleloader, that’s very slow to actually reload. If the goal on the other hand is a muzzleloaded firearm that can be reloaded fast, I would go for a single or double barrel pistol with a blunderbuss-muzzle, papercartridges and a permanent heating wire in the chamber that don’t need to be replaced. That can be achieved too, I’ve done such permanent igniters that can handle multiple shots before they need to be replaced, but they are bigger than the disposable igniters, require thicker wires and drain the battery much faster. I guess I could put those kind of permanent igniters in the rear chambers, so that I have eight shots to start with and then the gun has to be reloaded with four non-superposed charges for each reload. The balls I’m planning to use are only like 0.0013” too big for the bore I’m planning to make. |
February 11, 2020, 07:10 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
I just want to point out, if someone try to speedload whole combustible papercartridges there’s a chance that a ember is left in the bore pre-igniting the round. A leighweight U-shaped ramrod would be a safer option than a ordinary ramrod. Pouring the powder down the bore is also an option, because if it catch on fire atleast it won’t be any bullet infront of it. Also, it will be less residue without the combustible papercartridges and therefore less chances of embers..
|
February 12, 2020, 06:03 AM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
A few updates..
I tried making a sealed fit with a bit of copper pipe acting like the rear chamber, like this . With only a leadball infront, I didn’t succeed. Inside the chamber, the glap is obvious: So, I made the chamber face more angular: But still, I didn’t succeed, there’s a small glap (in reality it looks much smaller than in the photo: |
February 12, 2020, 12:08 PM | #37 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
I just want to point out,
Your pictures are way too large Quote:
The paper cartridge is NOT placed in the barrel and seated. The paper is torn (usually bitten open) the powder is poured down the barrel, then the paper is inserted to serve as a wad and the ball/bullet on top of that and rammed home.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
February 12, 2020, 03:37 PM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: September 15, 2019
Posts: 78
|
you need more to do.
|
February 12, 2020, 05:16 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
What are you going to use to set the powder off? An electric charge by itself won't do it. It takes heat to set off bp
|
February 13, 2020, 04:18 PM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
I tried to fire a superposed load today. I made an improvised barrel in cal .44 by using a steel pipe, my .44 ball were underdimensioned for the bore but that’s a good thing since the idea behind the experiment was to proof my sealing. I didn’t had any tapered chamber either to prevent compression of the rear charge.
I sealed the rear charge using blutak behind the ball and greased wad infront the bore. I wired everything together and took cover behind a stone just in case, push the button and BANG - one shot goes off. I check the barrel, everything seem okay and the rear round was still left in the chamber. I switch ON the rear circuit, took cover again, push the button - nothing happen. I couldn’t set the rear round off. I believe the reason behind that is that the compression from the recoil messed up the igniter. However, no blowback setting the rear charge off. So I guess it was a success for my sealing proofing. Last edited by Derringeer; February 13, 2020 at 04:52 PM. |
February 13, 2020, 04:22 PM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
Hawg, I use nichrome wire to set the powder off, but Kanthal works too.
|
February 13, 2020, 04:47 PM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
Regarding fast reloading of muzzleloaders with multiple barrels (pepperbox, over/under derringers etc.)
The goal is to be able to reload the gun faster than you can reload a modern cartridge revolver using a speedloader. Since you don’t need to manipulate the cylinder and extract spent cartridges, it’s not an unrealistic goal. Maybe a combination of these designs will work? https://youtu.be/Yf9mM15TRCY https://youtu.be/56ODcH2C_Xw attaching a magnet that stick to the muzzle holding it in place while ramming everything down with a ”multi-ramrod” is my spontaneous thought. Last edited by Derringeer; February 13, 2020 at 04:53 PM. |
February 14, 2020, 08:41 AM | #43 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
paper has to be heavily nitrated to be used. Stick with the Belton
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
February 14, 2020, 10:56 AM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Amity Oregon
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
With a little practice a normal person (not Jerry Miculek) can do a speedloader reload in 3 seconds and a full moonclip reload in 2. Even if you double those times you are still W-A-Y faster than anything you can do with a muzzleloader. |
|
February 14, 2020, 03:52 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,059
|
Years Ago I had the opportunity to buy a four shot side by side Muzzle loader .
It had two barrels and four locks . I past and happy it did . |
February 14, 2020, 04:29 PM | #46 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
4V50 Gary, nitrated paper, rolling paper or maybe pure black powder pellets, like those pyrodex pellets that you can buy for rifles, could be used, but none of those are waterproof. Is there any material that will burn clean and is waterproof too? A cartridge could be made out of packing tape for example, but the downside is that it left too much residue.
Maybe a lacquer could be used, that wont prevent the cartridge from igniting? Regarding the Belton, how did it solve the problem of gasleaking and overcompression? |
February 14, 2020, 05:27 PM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
Quote:
|
|
February 15, 2020, 01:20 PM | #48 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
What is the best prevention of chainfires, a waxed or a greased patch?
|
February 15, 2020, 02:02 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
|
For your application I'd say a lubed patch. I wouldn't use grease because it will contaminate the powder. Also you want to use vegetable based lubes not petroleum based lubes.
|
February 15, 2020, 03:11 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2019
Posts: 36
|
I’m curious, what’s the reason that I shouldn’t use a petroleum based lube? I’ve been using a petroleum based lithium grease, the label says that it can handle stress well, high pressure and high temperatures.
I have some beeswax and different kind of vegetable oils, like coconut oil, olive oil and canola oil. Which oil will work best? What about storage? What’s the best beeswax/oil ratio? Last edited by Derringeer; February 15, 2020 at 03:31 PM. |
Tags |
muzzleloader , rapid fire , speed loader |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|