The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting > Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 25, 2014, 07:05 PM   #1
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
What are the reasons for powder coating?

What are the reasons for powder coating?
salvadore is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 07:56 PM   #2
hartcreek
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
Powder coating

Powder coating is used on lead bullets so that you can shoot them out of a firearm that has polygonal rifling. The powder coating acts as a bullet lube so that lead does not scrap off and lead a polygonal rifled barrel.
hartcreek is offline  
Old June 25, 2014, 08:55 PM   #3
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
Jump to post #64 and read a few from there

(It's on page 3)

Oh, and another reason... if you have a bunch of Lyman molds, ..... surely you have a couple/few that cast undersized by a thousandth or so. Now, with powdercoating, that's just what you want! PC adds .002 to the diameter and now you can cast, coat, and resize to that perfect fit.
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.

Last edited by Beagle333; June 25, 2014 at 09:22 PM.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 06:51 AM   #4
David Bachelder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2011
Location: Trinity, Texas
Posts: 636
It allows the home bullet caster the ability to produce jacketed bullets. The Powder coat becomes the cast lead bullets jacket and replaces bullet lube.
__________________
David Bachelder
Trinity, Texas
I load, 9mm Luger, 38 and 40 S&W, 38 Special, 357Magnum, 45ACP, 45 Colt, 223, 300 AAC, 243 and 30-06
David Bachelder is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 08:53 AM   #5
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
Ok, so if I have a plain base mold like Lee's 45 255 rfp, that I run thru a .45 Colt rifle, I can skip the lubersizing process and powder coat as long as the final width works with the shooter. right?

Also I use a 358156 GC in a M-28 that is quite accurate when pushed hard, since I have to run it thru a sizer to set the gc anyway, would pc be worth worrying about?

Does it interfere with obturation in handguns?

Thanks for the info.
salvadore is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 01:31 PM   #6
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
I would size those bullets, no lube. Powder coat, and size again. Then load and shoot.

Powder coating is easy. PCed bullets are much cleaner to store, handle, and shoot. I have only been PCing for a few months but have never had any PCed bullet "fail". I have mostly used PC on my handgun bullets, 38/357, 9mm, .44 Mag., 45 ACP, but am trying some PCed .314" bullets in my Mosin Nagant. The performance, ie., expansion and accuracy, is the same as the cast bullets w/o a coating.

I would think the obturation is much less of concern with PCed than plain lead,as a good seal isn't needed as much. From what I've experienced and read, the bullet retains most of it's properties when PCed, like obturation, gripping the rifling, and expansion on target.
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...

Last edited by mikld; June 29, 2014 at 10:29 AM.
mikld is offline  
Old June 26, 2014, 02:08 PM   #7
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Another bonus of powder coating, is that it lets you eliminate or substantially reduce lube grooves, eliminate gas checks, and create much more compact bullets (all else being equal). As such, you get bullets that are more easily stabilized by slower rifling twist rates, and more case capacity.


Here's an example, using 300 gr WFN bullets designed for a short-throated .444 Marlin levergun:
First, a 'standard' version designed for a Hornady gas check.
You end up with a finished weight of about 307 gr (w/ GC and lube), and a seating depth of 0.507" (GC adds 0.017").

(.432-.433" final diameter)
Note: This design is already quite 'compact' for a .44 caliber 300 WFN. Most designs have more taper in the nose and larger lube grooves, making the bullet even longer than this example.



But as a PC bullet, the seating depth shrinks to 0.452" (about 0.002" of coating added to base), increasing case capacity by about 0.5 gr (depending on powder choice). Finished weight would be about 304 gr, with a higher theoretical ballistic coefficient than the standard bullet.
Everything from the crimp groove forward remains the same. The only changes are to the body and shank.

(.432" final diameter)
Attached Images
File Type: png 430-300 WFN GC.png (22.8 KB, 958 views)
File Type: png 430-300 WFN MGPC.png (22.5 KB, 939 views)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old June 27, 2014, 10:09 PM   #8
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
i wasnt sure where i was going to post this, but you asked at a good time, i have just started powdercoating and i am so impressed with the cleanliness, the ability to shoot faster, softer lead and NO smoke

i just built a 300blk a couple weeks ago and shot some lead bullets through it that were not powdercoated and it was a liquified leaded mess, i tried again with the same loads coated and it worked flawlessly even supersonic

so tomorrow i am going out with 300 bullets, 100 ALOX, 100 powdercoat and 100 plated, alll 124gr 9mm loaded with 4,2gr of HP-38; all bullets were seated to same and post sized

i will be testing velocity, groups @ 10-25-50 and rapid fire to see which leaves me the least build-up and if accuracy is improved or diminished with PC; ill report back sunday with results

all i can say is when it comes to cleaning your gun and having a true smokeless lead-cast round and powdercoating is easier, faster and cleaner than regular lube, so far i absolutely love it

i recommend trying it out for yourself and making your own judgement; less than 40$ to get started up

__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 08:32 AM   #9
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
I've said it before, this forum is a cornucopia of info. I'm sure these questions have been addressed in other posts by Beagle et al, but if wouldn't mind answering a few other ?s.

1. Is the pc toxic, can I use my kitchen oven? What temp and how long? Where do I purchase pc material?

2. If I have a .314 pc bullet and run it thru a .312 die will the pc remain?

3. Is regular aluminum foil an appropriate material for heating the pc bullets on?

4. I push a .314/.313 gc bullet out of my Marlin 32/20 @ 1850fps+ with little or no leading. I have a PB bullet of similar configuration. Will the PCed base act like a GC on the PB bullet?

I don't mean to be a pita, but any help would be appreciated.
salvadore is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 08:53 AM   #10
oldpapps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 518
Sal,

I will try to help.
"1. Is the pc toxic, can I use my kitchen oven? Most would council not to. You are still dealing with 'lead' and the polymers do vent gasses during the process. What temp and how long? This is both determined by the powder and your process. 325 to 425 degrees are the general spread, 400 degrees is standard and curing time is 12 minuets up. Where do I purchase pc material? Every place. 'Harbor Freight' is cheap (the RED is the best). I like 'Powder By The Pound', a little higher cost but more colors than I can name. (It helps that my brother lives 15 miles from them.)

2. If I have a .314 pc bullet and run it thru a .312 die will the pc remain? I have found that the lead will give it up before the polyester. I size my 44s (430) before and after coating, others do it only once.

3. Is regular aluminum foil an appropriate material for heating the pc bullets on? No, get the 'Non-Stick' stuff.

4. I push a .314/.313 gc bullet out of my Marlin 32/20 @ 1850fps+ with little or no leading. I have a PB bullet of similar configuration. Will the PCed base act like a GC on the PB bullet?" I push 130 grain flat base out of a 300 Blackout at 2070 FPS with no problems, The best I do with 125 grain jacketed is 2120 FPS with full function and no pressures. Some think a GC bullet looses accuracy when no GC is installed.

The process is simple and I think delivers much better results over faster [rifle speeds] lead loads with much less effort on my part.

OSOK
oldpapps is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 09:04 AM   #11
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
Thanks papps, with the other info that pretty much cleared it up, and thanks to the other posters, very helpful.
salvadore is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 02:39 PM   #12
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
i don't know about toxic, you def wil not be vaporizing lead into fumes at a mere 350-400 degrees. BUT, you will never get the smell of powder-coat out of your oven/kitchen. must be done outdoors, it is very stinky. the oven costs 17.99 at Wal-Mart and they had some even cheaper. not worth all your food tasting like paint for the next year for 17$
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 03:17 PM   #13
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
Mama ain't gonna be happy if her biscuits come out smelling like Grandpa's pants are burning!
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 04:11 PM   #14
Mike / Tx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
I'm not sure how it compares, but the sweetie hit the auto clean on the oven a few weeks back, only to discover that somehow she had left a plastic handled spatula in there. If it is worse than that no way, as that is still screwing up the kitchen when we light the oven off.

So might be a blessing in disguise for me huh...
__________________
LAter,
Mike / TX
Mike / Tx is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 06:21 PM   #15
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
Free use of the oven to PC for a couple of weeks, at least!
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 06:21 PM   #16
oldpapps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 518
I concur with 'skizzums' that lead remains in a solid state or not overly plastic state at most temps below 450 degrees but there are some things I just don't think suitable. I wouldn't pick up a newly cast lead bullet and start shewing on it. Nor do I think bringing lead into my cooking area is the correct thing to do.

With that covered, look at entry number 17 in this thread. The photo should provided ample reason to NOT use the kitchen stove.
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...from-baking-PC

Enjoy while you can,

OSOK
oldpapps is offline  
Old June 28, 2014, 07:14 PM   #17
Mike / Tx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2000
Posts: 2,101
Fear not ye breatheren of the silver stream, three will be NO powder coating in the kitchen stove... Nor would I put a tray of bullets in there to harden up either.

There are times in life when a man has to know his limitations, and well I know mine.

That said the old giant oven we had when I was growing up, well it had many uses. Pop used it to heat up barreled actions for blueing, along with scores of other scientific projects. Once we got a pan full of paraffin a touch hot and it lit off. Whoo Haaa, that was some fun right there for sure and certain. Nothing was hurt, injured, or permanently maimed, but there was plenty of shall we just say, "words" flying around for sure.

Nope but no powder coating in the house. But having heard of the smells, and as sensitive as I am to them I might not even do it out in the shop either. Plastic smells really work on me for some reason or another, and one thing I cannot stand is a roll of that clear poly. I can smell that stuff 30yds away. Whew what a stinch.
__________________
LAter,
Mike / TX
Mike / Tx is offline  
Old June 29, 2014, 12:53 AM   #18
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
sorry papps, no one answered your question. yes, the PC remains after sizing. No, do not use regular Al foil, se Reynolds non-stick foil. I cant answer your GC question because I have never GC'd a bullet
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old June 29, 2014, 04:07 AM   #19
salvadore
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
thanks for the heads up skizzum.
salvadore is offline  
Old June 29, 2014, 07:18 AM   #20
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
PC will handle sizing and it will not damage the coating. It makes it so slippery that you'll want to get out your mic and double check that your die actually sized anything. It just slips right through easily. For an extreme sizing example, there are a number of us sizing the .462 Hammer (A big MiHec HP meant for the .45-70) down to .452 for our .45LCs. It's a two step size, once from .462 to .457, then again through the .452 die and they look perfect afterward. PC is melted polyester, it is very flexible. And it is just a thin coat, 1/1000 of an inch thick. You can smash the bullet flat with a hammer and it'll stay on there. (by the way, smashing is one of the most popular tests to see if you are curing it properly.)

Since it is just a thin coat of polyester, it is not a gas check. You can shoot some gas check bullets at medium velocities without a gas check, just as you could with a regular lubed bullet that was fitted correctly to your gun, but if you want to apply full power, that little thin coat of plastic isn't going to stop gas cutting at high pressure. It isn't as tough as a metal gas check.
A lot of guy are enjoying shooting their .30-30s and .223s without checks for target shooting though. Try it and you'll find out how fast you can go unchecked. It should be faster than with regular lube... but not up to the book maximum on the loads.
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old July 1, 2014, 08:54 AM   #21
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
i did something really stupid last week, after i powdercoated 4-500 9x19s i grabbed a handful of them and used the calipers, the biggest one i measured was 358 but most were 357, so i skipped sizing

went to the range to test these things out and it went really bad, every 5-6 rounds i would have to pound one out of the barrel because it was 360 or more, so now i get to spend all day pullingh apart hundreds of rounds and sizing

luckily, i discover that to get the bullet out, all i need to do is run the completed round through the re-sizing die with the decapper removed and the bullet slides right out, thank god i didnt crimp

so long story short, if you PC you need to size
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old July 1, 2014, 11:54 AM   #22
oldpapps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 518
"something really stupid last week,"
skizzums

I beg to disagree. You validated a theory in random variables with a large sampling test. And you found that your theory was correct. With the number of samples, it can almost be considered a truism.



OSOK
oldpapps is offline  
Old July 3, 2014, 06:56 AM   #23
Sure Shot Mc Gee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
Kind'a wonder. If powder coating is the new wave in cast bullet performance. Verses traditional old school (bullet lubing) Why hasn't all or just one of the bullet manufactures jumped on the powder coating band wagon by now or bothered too introduced a powder coated bullet line-up of their own? As far as I know plating and powder coating are two totally different processes as is moly coatings as well.
Causes me wonder if powder coating itself has some un-spoken of serious problems or health issues in its use.
Sure Shot Mc Gee is offline  
Old July 3, 2014, 08:39 AM   #24
Beagle333
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Auburn, AL.
Posts: 2,332
Market is too small. Most shooters don't shoot cast and those that do are not all going to switch to colored bullets. Also, the coating process still doesn't make a coat that is as repeatable or as tough as a jacketed bullet.

PC is still in its infancy, as we do not yet know the best powder to use, nor the perfect process to apply it. We have found some of both which work great, but nowhere near tested and accepted sufficiently to say "This is it!" and set up assembly line and hope the process doesn't change again soon.

Coatings are finding a place in the cast world though. There are a few commercial guys now offering Hi-Tek coatings on their pistol bullets. It isn't really designed for rifles, and the PC is just beginning to be adapted to rifle bullets and has not reached any level of repeatability and precision that would attract someone away from their shiny copper bullets.

Hi-Tek and PC both appear to be attracting a following among indoor shooters who appreciate the low smoke and clean bullets as compared to lubes.
Here's a quote posted just this morning from a fellow new to PC:
Quote:
Well last night I fired my first batch of PC boolits at IDPA practice. Previously, at the end of shooting, my hands were filthy. Not the case last night. Same boolit, same load, a heck of a lot less ****. I'm sold...
Powdercoating still is just a .001" coat of melted and cured polyester. It will not handle mega pressures and long rides down a bore and therefore isn't going to threaten sales of XTPs or Ballistic Tips anytime soon.

But if you do cast your own, and you want to be able to shoot softer alloy with less chance of leading, and you appreciate nice clean, dry loading/seating dies and gun barrels, and not having to own or maintain a lubesizer, and can appreciate a nice variety of colors to choose from.... it might be just the ticket!
__________________
.
.
.
Have a Colt and a smile.

Last edited by Beagle333; July 3, 2014 at 10:12 AM.
Beagle333 is offline  
Old July 7, 2014, 07:20 PM   #25
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
isnt herters nylon jacket ammo (TNJ) a similar product to our powder-coating?
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11515 seconds with 11 queries