The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 1, 2017, 08:48 PM   #1
Stringer77
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2017
Posts: 2
Wanting to refinish a S&W 642 Airweight. Best options?

Hi there. I have decided to give up pocket autos in favor of this modern j frame with no internal lock. It is my first revolver. I got it from my father, and it is growing on me. The only thing is the finish is not appealing (cylinder & frame dissimilar metals), and slight peeling of clear coat. What I really wanted was a bright hard chrome finish, but I got a quote from fords for $400 and that's a bit more than id like to spend, plus I don't want to wait 17 weeks for it. Any ideas on what i should look into, as far as a finish with bling? Originally wanted bright hard chrome with some stag handles, I thought that would look pretty pimp. Or is this in someway a bad idea? Please post your thoughts, either way. Thanks for reading.
Stringer77 is offline  
Old November 1, 2017, 09:17 PM   #2
Deaf Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
If you want to refinish a 642 (I use one very often) I suggest buying another one. Just about the same price to hard chrome, NP3, nickle, etc.

Use the old one as a practice gun and get a new 642 (with no Hillary lock.)

I do have two 642s. One a "Pro" model, sans Hillary lock, I carry often and the other a scratched up 642 I got for $300, tax inc. I use it as a practice gun (and it does have a Hillary lock!)

Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides
Deaf Smith is offline  
Old November 1, 2017, 09:17 PM   #3
reddog81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
I'd guess the 2 dissimilar metals will always have a contrast unless you use some kind of duracoat / ceracoat product.

I thought the hard Crome look went out of style a long time ago. I know it was popular back when you could go down to the local garage and they'd do it for you in the same tanks where they did car parts.

You can buy a new one for about $400. Between shipping, FFL fees, prep work, and the actual refinishing you'll be lucky to find anything under $250-$300 for someone who knows what they are doing.
reddog81 is offline  
Old November 1, 2017, 10:35 PM   #4
Buckeye!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 849
CCR Refinshing.... They do great work
Buckeye! is offline  
Old November 1, 2017, 11:56 PM   #5
Cheapshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
If it's a carry gun, why? Do you take it out, and show everyone how purdy it is?
If you want a show piece to carry go buy one. Just leave Dad's old gun alone, and enjoy it for what it is. Refinishing done right is costly. Refinishing on the cheap is a disaster!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING!
Cheapshooter is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 12:23 AM   #6
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,978
http://www.mahovskysmetalife.com/index.htm

They do hard chrome, and it's not particularly expensive.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 10:09 AM   #7
Stringer77
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2017
Posts: 2
Thanks. I think I am going with metalife!
Stringer77 is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 11:59 AM   #8
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...cylinder & frame dissimilar metals..." Yep. SS and an Al frame. Limits the kind of finish you can use. However, anodizing works on both.
Not much point in hard chroming SS. Or Al for that matter. Even though SS gets chromed very day because HC is abrasion resistant. Hard chrome isn't shiney like a bumper either. Looks more like brushed Al.
There shouldn't be any 'clear coat'.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 12:27 PM   #9
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
The finish on the Stainless air-weight frames is paint, in an attempt to match the color of the stainless cylinder and barrel. Sometimes the use of harsh solvents to clean the gun will reek havoc with the finish and expedite wear/peeling, sometimes it's just from hostler wear and use. Nature of the beast. Some folks have had S&W refinish the gun under warranty, there are rumors S&W will do it one time that way. I dunno for sure. Wouldn't hurt to give them a call or send 'em an e-mail before you spend your own monies on it. As others have said, it's a inexpensive, effective carry gun. The finish does not impact accuracy, reliability or conceal-ability. Last thing I worry about with my EDC, is how pretty she looks when showin' her off to others. I'm more concerned with how pretty she shoots.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 01:51 PM   #10
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
I think the best looking J frames are the ones with plenty of cosmetic wear.

You know the gun has done it's job.
Model12Win is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 02:00 PM   #11
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,978
The finish on newer airweights is paint. Old ones used clear anodizing on the frames.
Anodizing does not work on stainless!
Hard chroming the dissimilar metals requires an electroless nickel underplate.
Industrial hard chrome is neither shiny or dull. It is simply a coating over a substrate. The method of finish of that substrate dictates the final finish. Bright polish=shiny, etc.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 08:58 PM   #12
Auto5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2013
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 662
I like the contrast. I'm actually thinking about polishing the cylinder and barrel on mine.
__________________
At the young age of five, a bear told me that I was the only person who could prevent forest fires. Why I was chosen, I'll never know.
Auto5 is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 09:25 PM   #13
Carmady
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,735
If it's going to be a carry gun I'd spray it with aluminum paint to make it lighter.
Carmady is offline  
Old November 2, 2017, 11:21 PM   #14
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,978
Love it!
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old November 18, 2017, 07:36 AM   #15
mauiglide
Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2011
Posts: 33
Robar is where I'm going to get my Model 638 refinished. That is when I have the cash. Ha!
mauiglide is offline  
Old November 26, 2017, 01:30 AM   #16
Ibmikey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
I have a pistol with aluminum frame and steel slide refinished with Metaloy. The pistol now looks like it has satin nickle on it. This was done about five years ago and it shows no appreciable wear. I could have saved $200 by buying that can of aluminum paint!
Ibmikey is offline  
Old November 26, 2017, 07:30 AM   #17
Screwball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2012
Location: ME
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye! View Post
CCR Refinshing.... They do great work

CCR does not plate or strip anodized aluminum... which a 642 frame is made of. I can attest to CCR’s work, as it is top notch, but if you want a finish like that, have to go with Robar.





Two things occurred with this refinishing, only one needed to be worried about. When they stripped the anodizing, the scrollwork on the frame/sideplate really lightened. If you look close, you can see it... but don’t do it if you are partial to that.

Other thing was similar, but more important; the serial number on the bottom of the frame. Robar told me they reengraved it so there wouldn’t be any issue with ATF, but said it lightened up with the chemical strip. Figure it looked like the scrollwork. Good thing was I had a scratch in that area from when I had Hogue Monogrips on the gun, so it was removed during the refinishing.

Being I have had Robar do a J-frame, I don’t know how other companies would hand these issues or if they would fix the serial number problem. Definitely something to consider. The 642 pictured above was done in NP3 Plus, with the 9mm conversion cylinder done after the original gun. Matches up perfectly.
Screwball is offline  
Old December 7, 2017, 11:17 PM   #18
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,751
I am in the camp of "whats the point"? Its a carry gun with a finish thats known to wear. But if you want a pretty one here is one with no lock for $319. I bought a 442 no lock from them and the shipping to me was around $9. This was the very best price I found on one of these. I paid $339 for mine by the way so this is a deal.

http://www.keelyarms.com/product_p/sw_103810.htm

But if you really want a hard shiny chrome I would look for a used steel gun already done that way. Just my thoughts.
ThomasT is offline  
Old December 8, 2017, 09:26 AM   #19
Screwball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2012
Location: ME
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratshooter View Post
But if you really want a hard shiny chrome I would look for a used steel gun already done that way. Just my thoughts.

23 ounces (640) compared to 15 ounces (642)...

If I could have got a Titanium cylinder in 9mm, I would have done that to get the loaded weight down to a standard 642’s empty weight.
Screwball is offline  
Old December 8, 2017, 07:52 PM   #20
ThomasT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,751
Quote:
23 ounces (640) compared to 15 ounces (642)...
Good point. But IIRC my model 31-1 with a 2" barrel only weighs 19oz. I had no idea the 640 weighed that much. Thats real close to the 26oz my SP-101 weighs. But the weight sure helps with the recoil.

I looked up a model 36 and weight for it is listed at 19.5 oz. There must be a lot of extra steel in the 640.
ThomasT is offline  
Old December 9, 2017, 10:57 AM   #21
gnystrom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Posts: 308
I'm with most and ask why refinish a working gun. For the cost you can own two and keep one just to look at when toy feel the need. (Just don't dry fire it because those pesky turn lines start to show.)
gnystrom is offline  
Old December 10, 2017, 11:14 AM   #22
pete2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
The 642 is a working gun, never gonna be pretty no matter the finish. An old 60 or 36 is pretty in like new condition.
pete2 is offline  
Old December 12, 2017, 08:05 AM   #23
zimm
Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 33
Can you find someone local to cerekote it?
zimm is offline  
Old December 12, 2017, 08:14 AM   #24
springer99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 2008
Posts: 355
Why would anyone bother refinishing a J frame 642, etc. Probably cheaper to just buy a new one.

+ I think Stringer77 is long gone.
springer99 is offline  
Old December 12, 2017, 10:34 PM   #25
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
A bit like worrying about the wear on the tires of your new car. Any gun that is carried and used will show wear at some point; the only way to prevent it is to wrap the gun in cotton wool and store it in the safe.

Jim
James K is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11513 seconds with 10 queries