|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 11, 2014, 12:36 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Bloomberg remarks on CO recall vote
Rolling Stone magazine is reportedly set to publish an interview in which Michael Bloomberg downplays the CO Senate recall vote by making the (IMHO) rather bizarre and incongruous claim that...
Quote:
The magazine was initially reported to be pulling the article completely, but as I write this, the latest update says that the article was accidentally published early and will be reposted as originally scheduled on July 14th. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...3.html?ml=po_r I personally view the CO recall vote as a BIG loss for the Bloomberg/MAIG/MDA side, as it proved that gun rights advocates will go to the polls for their beliefs, while the same is not necessarily true of gun control supporters. I think it's interesting that Bloomie has chosen to publicly downplay the results as trivial, but he's (fortunately for our side!) done it in a way that's likely to offend many voters in the West.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; July 11, 2014 at 05:10 PM. Reason: Hudak --> Giron |
|
July 11, 2014, 12:46 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
I’m not sure how much gun control plays into this, but CNN is reporting that Colorado Senator Mark Udall was skipping fundraising events featuring President Obama. Mr. Udall claims this was simply a scheduling issue, but CNN also noted that Mr. Obama’s approval ratings in Colorado are at 38%. Again, not sure how much is motivated by gun control, but it seems the new gun laws have to be a consideration in upcoming Colorado elections.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...er-with-obama/
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
July 11, 2014, 02:34 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
|
Hudak wasn't recalled, she resigned, and her district is nowhere near Pueblo, its in the northern Denver suburbs.
|
July 11, 2014, 04:11 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2013
Location: Western New York
Posts: 454
|
Our best weapon against Bloomers is his mouth. He is self defeating. Let's hope that he never learns to shut up.
|
July 11, 2014, 04:51 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
My first post has been corrected. I need a better editor.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; July 11, 2014 at 05:09 PM. |
|
July 11, 2014, 05:16 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
|
Not a problem, they were essentially interchangeable.
|
July 11, 2014, 05:57 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
|
Quote:
The Only reason the Republicans were victorious in these recall election was because there were only two choices on the ballot. A Republican and a Democrat. Hudak won her seat in CO with less than 1% margin over the Republican challenger. BUT, the Democrat funded (L) candidate Sweeny, received almost 7% of the votes. If the recall would have included a Spoiler (L) candidate the republicans would have had their butts handed to them. Make no mistake, the Democrats will not make this mistake come General Election day. They will fund spoiler (L) candidates all across CO and not only regain the lost seats, but pick up a few more more just for good measure. |
|
July 11, 2014, 06:30 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
My assertion is that the recall election was a victory for gun rights because it demonstrated that, when a close election is taking place, the RKBA can carry the day when it's the #1 issue on the ballot. That said, it's disputable to what degree the results were determined by partisan die-hards who were less concerned with the RKBA than with which party would win. Of course, any outbreak of foot-in-mouth by Bloomers goes in the "Win" column.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; July 11, 2014 at 06:34 PM. Reason: stuff added |
|
July 11, 2014, 07:21 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
|
Bloomberg will fund dozens maybe Hundreds of (L) candidates all across America to ensure Democrat victories.
The sad fact is that those that vote for Bloomberg's spoilers won't have a clue until it's too late. |
July 11, 2014, 08:47 PM | #10 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Bloomberg is making a big mistake with such stereotypes, and it's one I want him to continue to make. Following Sandy Hook, he promised politicians that he'd make it safe for politicians to vote for gun control. He also stated that he would make a vote for gun control the only safe vote. After all, he has a bunch of money to throw at the whole shebang, right? Then Colorado happened, and word went out that Bloomberg wasn't really keeping anybody safe. He rubbed salt in the wound with his statement following the recalls of Morse and Giron: Quote:
As far as Hudak, she wasn't directly recalled, but she did step down in the face of one.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
July 11, 2014, 10:10 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
When I traveled internationally, people had heard of: New York, Texas, and California, and in that order. NYC was nothing but rich power-brokers, Texas nothing but oil-rich cowboy ranchers and outlaws (seriously), and California nothing but ridiculously good-looking celebrities (who do that for a career) --------------------------------------- Fair warning, I'm going on a slight tangent here; I think we need to keep a close eye on Bloomberg, and make darn sure he never goes unopposed, but I think we'll have exponentially less and less to worry about from him going forward. Every radical group has a window of opportunity to plant their flag of victory, and BB blew his on the post-Newtown debacle. Take an extreme, extreme example; Al Qaeda in Iraq, and the resurgent ISIS movement. Both saw early and rapid gain, and found favor with large swaths of the populace with their anti-status-quo message and promises of better results through all. But they were sufficiently rebuffed (the former, at least) for a long enough time that the people were able to see them in action, and saw them for what they were; they had no interest in governing, they just wanted to kill people --and that's not what their supporting populations wanted, so they lost support during the Sunni Awakening where local leaders turned against them. Similarly (or rather, metaphorically) Bloomberg has been revealed to pretty much anyone paying attention to have no intention of reducing violence, gun or otherwise; he wants all civilian guns gone, forever. Only a tiny fraction of the population supports that goal, so he will be frustrated if he tries to direct public opinion from that area. What we need to do, is continue to show him for what he is; a would be dictator of peoples' lives, a meddler no one would want as a neighbor, fixating for marketing purposes on a single object that is at best a symbol of the broader problems he claims to seek solutions for. When people see that he has no solutions for gun-violence or violence in general, as more and more are daily, and is not even seeking them while promoting his cause, the charlatan will find fewer and fewer marks willing to donate to his cause. MAIG is already hemorrhaging mayors, which is probably as much the cause for this latest "Everytown" incarnation, as anything. TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
July 11, 2014, 10:12 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
July 11, 2014, 10:46 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
To some extent it does, but the national legislature is a more complex arena than New York City, and I think he's already finding that out the hard way. Tom Ridge resigning Everytown within two weeks of signing on is a huge blow that will register with a lot of politicians.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
July 11, 2014, 11:23 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2013
Location: Western New York
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
He tried MAIG and failed. Then he bought/funded-in-the-first-place MDAAGV. THEN, he folded both into Everytown (the name itself a show of arrogance). He depends on the ignorance of his audience, but sooner or later more people will catch on to the fact that he keeps creating and abandoning gun control organizations. Then they'll start wondering why he does that instead of sticking with one thing. Our arguments to them should be to ask: "hmm interesting idea, how exactly will that stop violence of any kind?" "How will stopping internet sales of ammo stop violence? "If the police know people have bought thousands of rounds of ammo, what exactly are they going to do with that information that will stop violence?" But we need to target the people in the middle. The fence sitters or people that are ignorant about guns and can be swayed by truth and honesty. |
|
July 12, 2014, 10:36 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
TCB *barnbwt's theory on why urban environments breed dependency
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
July 12, 2014, 09:28 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2002
Location: Falcon Colorado
Posts: 256
|
I have more than a sneaking suspicion that Bloomberg may be losing his marbles.
I was tempted to have a picture of myself standing in the middle of our paved road, holding a Mini-14 and a Big Gulp, and sending it to him. But he's not worth it. |
July 13, 2014, 12:06 AM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Resigned before her recall was completed knowing that her predecessor would be appointed and a Democrat, since the vote difference was down to one. She would have been recalled otherwise. |
|
July 13, 2014, 12:12 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 596
|
I have more than a sneaking suspicion that Bloomberg may be losing his marbles.
I think the same and not just because I don't like him. According to Forbes, he is the 10th wealthiest man in America and the 16th wealthiest in the world. He's been a Democrat, a Republican and is now an Independent.He is a man who is used to getting whatever he wants and his gun-control jihad has certainly not worked out the way he hoped. That can't sit well with an egomaniac like that. His group claimed victory here in Colorado, but for those of us who live here, the new laws are inconvenient at best, cost 3 Democrats their offices, and sent our governor scrambling for political cover. |
July 13, 2014, 12:14 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Bloomberg is right about one thing, the Colorado law was passed and is not going to be repealed, so the loss of a couple of his useful fools at election time is not his concern.
I think he's a megalomaniac, too. Money is power. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. |
July 13, 2014, 03:09 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2013
Location: Western New York
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:10 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: live in a in a house when i'm not in a tent
Posts: 2,483
|
As if we needed more proof that Mr. B doesn't know nor care about people outside the world of his mind....
The sad truth is that there is probably no shortage of people in Colorado with their own agendas that would line up all night to take his money to run for a elected position if all they had to do in exchange was throw guns under the bus.
__________________
I'm right about the metric system 3/4 of the time. |
July 14, 2014, 05:27 PM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: December 12, 2008
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:23 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2010
Location: Hampstead NC
Posts: 1,450
|
You are correct about that, she resigned so that her party could hold on to her seat once she realized that the recall was going to happen.
|
|
|