|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 12, 2010, 08:34 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Posts: 166
|
Crouching tigress, hidden makarov...
|
July 12, 2010, 09:35 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Dirty Harry has nothing over these Chinese cops, that is for sure!
Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
July 12, 2010, 10:13 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,430
|
Looked kinda "iffy" to me.
She was lucky on several counts: 1. showed her hand early and he didn't notice 2. drew and nearly raised the gun over her head ala "Hollywood Cowboy" shots 3. hostage's head was extremely close to the perps as he moved backward Some days the cards fall in your favor, and it was her day, I guess.
__________________
Shooting more, typing less |
July 13, 2010, 12:15 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 195
|
One thing I will point out about China is that they are fanatic about avoiding or squelching trouble, chaos or disorder ("luan"). If you are a threat to public order, you will be dealt with severely.
If you offer this threat by endangering the public (holding a girl at knife point), or challenging the government (Tian An Men), you should expect to die. If you think cops should shoot until the threat is eliminated, then think of the official view as being, "If you did it once, you may do it again. If you are breathing, you are a threat." Disorder in SUPPORT of the government will still bring you grief. When the US announced the sale of additional F16s to Taiwan (1992ish), university students in Beijing protested in front of the US Embassy, in vocal support of their national government's published opinion. They were hauled into the Chinese diplomatic police guard hut and beaten. Protest=disorder=bad=official response. Regards, Tom |
July 13, 2010, 08:56 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 1,516
|
It's easy to monday morning quarterback.
However...when she first shot the perp he fell back with the girl. He was still a threat. She had no way of knowing, at that time, where the bullet hit him or if it even him, she had to keep on shooting. |
July 13, 2010, 09:34 PM | #31 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2010
Posts: 1
|
Hello, I am a sometime lurker of this forum and since Chinese is my first language (I am TAIWANESE not Chinese!) Though I don't have audio I can read the running points. I can fill in some of the blanks here.
1. The uniformed policeman drank some coke from the bottle to assure the hostage-taker the coke was not laced. In fact, it had been laced with sedatives. 2. What escalated the situation was when he stabbed his hostage in the arm to threaten the armed policeman and camera crew approaching him; this occurred at roughly 2:30-2:45. Previously the criminal demanded to talk to the media but he became very upset when he saw an armed officer was escorting the crew. 4. Apparently he cut or stabbed his hostage on the skin when he got excited, as you can see her shirt was stained with blood. 5. The hostage-taker said there are people in many Chinese southern provinces who would like to see him dead. The hold up occurred in a bank. The man might be a criminal on the run or just some dude who owed loan sharks money. Hope that was helpful. |
July 14, 2010, 08:17 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
One thing to remember is that, in Communist China, the authorities have a lot more "leeway" in handling situations than those LEO's in free nations....
...not sure I'd want to see American cops carrying out executions...but everything before that is applaudable....
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
July 14, 2010, 08:31 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 1,516
|
Thank you very much Triple C. That was indeed helpful.
|
July 14, 2010, 09:24 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,786
|
Triple C
May I add my thanks for your contribution?
And do you see in the report any indication of how long the hostage was held before the policewoman took action? The title of the thread is " . . . in seconds," and while her action took only seconds I wonder how long the whole episode was, i.e. how long it took the police to prepare for action, how long they negotiated, the time it took to maneuver the BG into a place where they could shoot, etc. Any insight you can give in that regard is much appreciated. |
July 14, 2010, 10:42 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2009
Location: Torrington, CT. USA
Posts: 299
|
Sorry, but what is the point of letting that puke live. Armed robbery and kidnapping with plenty of witnesses. What would be the point of a trial? So this guy could try and justify his actions with some sob story or claims of insanity (not sure either would help you in China anyway). No, I think a the point he was at, 4 shots worked just fine. We should do that more often here. Like when the cops are chasing come dope dealer who carjacked some innocent person and lead a high speed chase through neighborhoods. They should be able to drive up along side and put one in his ear. You'd see a lot less things like that if you did.
|
July 14, 2010, 11:39 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Well, unless you're talking about revamping the entire sentencing guidelines for crimes in America, I certainly have a problem with the roadside application of a sentence that the courts themselves couldn't even impose if the perpetrator were apprehended and sent to trial.
|
July 14, 2010, 12:05 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I think you misunderstand the continued shooting as some kind of deliberate statement as to delivering justice and a sentence. I think it is just an almost automatic response to guarantee a dangerous person will not continue his activity.
Her reaction - laughing a bit - isn't also a business as usual but an emotional release and parasympathetic rebound of sorts. With a touch of an endorphin blast after a succesful aggressive action.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 14, 2010, 12:18 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Sorry, I was replying specifically to Rattletrap's post above mine, and not the China shooting.
If the death penalty isn't currently imposed in America for dealing dope, carjacking, or reckless driving, then I absolutely have a problem with the police "putting one in his ear" to end the chase. |
July 14, 2010, 12:34 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2009
Posts: 619
|
Is there a reason I am not able to view the video? I get a google server error. Anybody else with this problem?
EDIT: Never mind. Working now. |
July 14, 2010, 12:46 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2010
Location: Communist State of IL.
Posts: 1,562
|
If we took out criminals in this manner the "lawyer's" would have a field day but I wish it were the case in the US! Do I want the U.S to be more like China? NO! But, the gangs/terrorists we have in this country need to be taken care of in the same way this guy was! Criminals have more rights then victims do and it's just wrong to let these sick people live out the rest of their lives in jail on our dime! :barf::barf::barf::barf:
__________________
NRA Life Member, SAF Member |
July 14, 2010, 12:51 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
Chinese policewoman shot hostage taker [English subtitles]
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ (>_<) |
|
July 14, 2010, 01:35 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,465
|
I don't know ScottRiqui I think criminals who run from the police should be given a 5 mile time limit to think about how bad they want to run then let a police helicopter with a tow missile end the chase. Why should police let them get away(they broke the law) and why should innocent people driving down the street be put in danger.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! * Nope, the old nag's still dead . (Capt Charlie) |
July 14, 2010, 01:48 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
I'm not trying to change anyone's mind - these are just my opinions. But running from the cops isn't a capital offense (if it were, that would shorten a lot of foot chases considerably), and while the danger to uninvolved innocents in a chase is a real possibility, we don't execute people for what they *might* do -the police don't necessarily wait for the act to be committed, but they at least wait until the offense is imminent. After all, even a simple foot chase could easily end in a hostage situation if there are uninvolved people around - does that mean that the police are justified in shooting any criminal that takes off on foot?
And as for the whole "we'd see a lot less of this kind of thing if the police could just kill the offenders" argument - that's absolutely true, but it's not justification. We'd see a lot less shoplifting if it were a capital offense and subject to on-the-spot execution, but that doesn't make it a good idea. |
July 14, 2010, 01:55 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,712
|
Thanks NATE!!!
Here is a slightly different view, not in English, however... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIlT5y6baps&NR=1
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
July 14, 2010, 02:04 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Location: OOOOOOOOOOO-Klahoma!
Posts: 403
|
Police officers are not always right - just like everyone else. In this country, I think they've already got more than enough discretionary power on when and what kind of force is necessary. This is but one reason why we have courts.
|
July 14, 2010, 02:15 PM | #46 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
In case nobody has said it yet, Welcome to the site Triple C. Don't forget to bookmark us and come back to us reprobates often.
The coke the officer imbibed may also have contributed to her taking the chance she did and her response after. I will not second guess her and in a similar situation I would hope I would have been as efficient.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
July 14, 2010, 03:22 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Can we stay with the tactical issue - debating your view of criminal justice and punishment isn't relevant. Nor do we need more attaboys and I wish I was there or could do the same.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 15, 2010, 09:49 AM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 850
|
Quote:
Personally, I believe this video illustrates the versatility of a small calliber handgun. Sure with a rifle she could have taken the shot from further away, but with a handgun and an increasing proximity, she can MAKE the shot unstead of waiting to TAKE the shot. And as we saw, the gentlemen may not have stayed down with a single shot. She was able to "make sure" he stayed down. A rifleman would not have been able to do this. The hostage would have been well in the way to block a follow-up shot (or 3); possibly giving him time to take her life in the event of a wound instead of a kill. Instead, she took a small handgun, got in close, and made sure about it. Well done and solid tactics made sure that the only person who got dead was the bad guy. I see no problem with her tactics. A wise man once said, "Fear the man with one gun." You should do this because a man who wields a single weapon perfectly understands the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of that weapon and will employ them effectively in any situation, adjusting his tactics accordingly. This woman had a 9x18mm Makarov. She knew she had to get in close. She also understood the ballistic limitations of her small caliber, so she put enough rounds in him to make sure he didn't get up and wasn't a threat. If it was a .45ACP, her tactics very well may have been different. Solid from my standpoint, ~LT
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ- Greek:"Come and take them..." Meaning: Here we peaceably stand as armed and free men, willing to defend that peace, and ready to make war upon anyone who threatens that freedom. |
|
July 15, 2010, 03:12 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Location: central Arkansas
Posts: 400
|
If I understand things right, the Chinese police are part of the People's Revolutionary Army. I'd expect they'd be carrying the standard Army FMJ hardball load. That's not exactly a "manstopper" cartridge.
It could be that we're seeing a difference in training. I don't know what most US PDs are doing nowadays, but the civilian defense courses used to teach "keep pulling the trigger until it doesn't go bang any more." That's how I was taught, anyway. |
July 15, 2010, 03:25 PM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|