The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 20, 2017, 08:41 PM   #1
Oldjarhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 4, 2008
Posts: 508
Muzzle flash computer generated digitally on TV shows

Has anyone noticed on crime TV shows like Person of Interest, and Hawaii Five 0, that it appears gunfire muzzle flashes seem to being digitally produced by computer on film. Fake blood spatter as well. I know this, because I have carefully observed when TV shows have someone firing a semiautomatic handgun, I see muzzle flashes, but no slide movement at all. No cycling another round. The only exception is during close ups.

Does anyone have any inside information on this? Just curious. Seems to make sense. Saves time, and makes the gunshot scenes easier to film, I expect.
Oldjarhead is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 09:05 PM   #2
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,883
I read that the CGI muzzle flashes are used in place of blanks to cut down on noise and scare people into thinking an actual shooting is happening.

Yeah, it looks dumb because nothing moves, the slide doesn't move, there's no recoil. I remember watching a movie with Dwayne Johnson, the future President of the United States, where he uses a Ruger Alaskan with .454 Casull ammo and it never recoils when he shoots it.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 09:19 PM   #3
Berserker
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2015
Location: WI & UP
Posts: 284
I assume all blood splatters are fake.
Berserker is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 11:30 PM   #4
10-96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
I assume all blood splatters are fake.
Lol, you never watched me work on my Jeep! Great 37 year old hunting wagon, but dang does it ever keep my skin well ventilated!
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day)

I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two.
10-96 is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 12:33 AM   #5
dakota.potts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Posts: 3,084
I watched a low budget zombie film once where I noticed some of the shooting frames were kind of wonky. The character was in a dark sewer system shooting an MP5 but there seemed to be a kind of "twitch". I slowed it down and played it, and every muzzle flash for the MP5 was a very short frame of a person shooting an AR15 outdoors with the camera focused on the muzzle.

I guess that was cheaper than paying somebody to digitally input flash and noise.
__________________
Certified Gunsmith (On Hiatus)
Certified Armorer - H&K and Glock Among Others
You can find my writings at my website, pottsprecision.com.
dakota.potts is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 04:50 AM   #6
kozak6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
Yeah, it's probably much cheaper and safer to use airsoft or rubber guns and add effects in post production.

I recall a Syfy Channel movie that used spray painted Nerf guns!

Quote:
I assume all blood splatters are fake.
You ever watch Eagleheart ?
kozak6 is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 09:37 AM   #7
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
Even airsofts cycle the slide ...
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 10:23 AM   #8
Berserker
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2015
Location: WI & UP
Posts: 284
"Lol, you never watched me work on my Jeep! Great 37 year old hunting wagon, but dang does it ever keep my skin well ventilated!"



Are you on TV?
Berserker is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 10:53 AM   #9
tipoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
Yeah they've been doing both for a few years now. in a number of TV shows and made for TV movies. That's where it began and looked exceedingly fake at first. At times the flash comes from an couple of inches away from the muzzle. It saves them money, time and hassle from neighbors. Blanks can be troublesome as well (remember Brandon Lee).

The fake CGI blood is obvious as well. That also saves time. It takes too many takes to get the blood spatter shot out of a squeeze bottle to hit just right or fly through the air in a perfect arc. But CGI and a kid can do it in a couple of minutes. How else they gonna get Tara Reid to chainsaw ten sharks flying through the air?

They coming out with a new version of The Mummy. It'll be all GCI. Makes me miss Boris Karloff in the original.

tipoc
tipoc is offline  
Old May 21, 2017, 10:55 AM   #10
Berserker
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2015
Location: WI & UP
Posts: 284
I pick up apart TV, but blood splatter has never concerned me. I always understood TV is fake and people are not getting shot.
Berserker is offline  
Old May 22, 2017, 04:55 PM   #11
JoeSixpack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,048
It's true, they'll use rubber guns or more commonly airsoft.
It looks incredibly fake.

the walking dead has been known to cheap out alot.. don't recall the season number where they're at the prison but you could actually see them shooting revolvers where the cylinder never moved.

It's also pretty obvious when they do the cheesy "Hollywood recoil" acting.


Back before they had CGI to try to add this stuff in they use other methods.
According to the Day of the Dead commentary track they use propane based prop guns to produce a muzzle flash more reliably.

Apparently since most film is shot at like 24 Or is it 25 fps?
even on automatic fire with real weapons they might only get a muzzle flash like every 3rd or 4th shot on film.
The lay audience expects muzzle flash I guess.

Some might say the move to post effects was about being safer..
But Im fairly certain in most instances it's a cost saving exercise.
You can get a lot more airsoft guns than real ones, not to mention the ammo.

Unfortunately it really cheapens the already budget strapped movies imo.
especially since they usually don't CGI in things like slide or cylinder movement and ejected brass.

It's fine for amateur movies or youtube video's but has no business in a serious film it never looks right.
JoeSixpack is offline  
Old May 22, 2017, 08:35 PM   #12
Berserker
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2015
Location: WI & UP
Posts: 284
This is what bother you? Not why would anyone do this or that. But zombie killing doesn't look real to you (
Berserker is offline  
Old May 22, 2017, 08:43 PM   #13
CalmerThanYou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2017
Posts: 323
For what I pay for cable each month, I expect real blood.
CalmerThanYou is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 02:12 PM   #14
Berserker
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2015
Location: WI & UP
Posts: 284
Ok, I just got an antenna, which is why I am not picky.
Berserker is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 06:17 PM   #15
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Advantages to using fake guns and CGI muzzle flash:
  • No need for costly armorers on-set
  • No need to carefully supervise cast and crew members with felony records (e.g. Mark Wahlberg, Danny Trejo, Snoop Dogg)
  • Reduced safety risks (Google Jon-Erik Hexum and Brandon Lee)
  • No blanks consumed = lower cost
  • Rare and/or historic firearms are more easily obtained because non-firing replicas or deactivated wallhangers can be used, and there are no problems obtaining oddball-caliber blanks
  • Fantastical imaginary prop guns don't have to be built around "real" functional actions in order to fire
  • Filming is less disruptive in populated areas
  • Easier to arrange permission to film in locales with strict gun-control laws
  • No coordination problems, such as timing the gunfire and the bullet-impact squibs to match one another
  • [EDIT TO ADD] No issues with obvious flinching by actors (e.g. Gert Fröbe in Goldfinger)
(Partially cribbed from an earlier post of mine )
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak

Last edited by carguychris; May 24, 2017 at 10:05 AM. Reason: reword, stuff added
carguychris is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 09:15 PM   #16
JoeSixpack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,048
disadvantages:

almost always easily spotted as CGI. cheezy
JoeSixpack is offline  
Old May 24, 2017, 08:52 AM   #17
jackstrawIII
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2016
Location: Upstate NY.
Posts: 901
Quote:
I remember watching a movie with Dwayne Johnson, the future President of the United States
Hahahahaha, nice!
__________________
In God we trust.
jackstrawIII is offline  
Old May 24, 2017, 10:04 AM   #18
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixpack
almost always easily spotted as CGI. cheezy
Not necessarily; it depends how good the actor is at faking recoil, and how much time the producers are willing to spend in post-production. A lot of low-budget and time-critical productions (i.e. direct-to-video movies and TV shows) have easily spotted CGI; major studio movies, less so.

One certain disadvantage is that the actors need to be taught to feign the effects of recoil.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
Old May 24, 2017, 08:08 PM   #19
TRX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 24, 2008
Location: central Arkansas
Posts: 400
> Dwayne Johnson, the future President of the United States

Dwayne who?

Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho has dibs, I think...
TRX is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08137 seconds with 10 queries