The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 20, 2017, 10:50 AM   #26
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
I have instituted a number of QC checks in my reloading process.
I read the famous last word statement all the time: "It must have been a double charge" or "I do not know what happened, the light through the barrel was shut off" etc.

A disciplined reloaders knows the weight of the case, bullet and powder charge and then there is the weight of the primer. And then there are those reloaders that do not have a clue, they do not know if they have the correct powder charge, they do not know the weight of the case and they do not know the weight spread on the bullets.

For me there is nothing entertaining about pulling the trigger without a hint of what is about to happen. I have enough cases to match the weight of the case so after I load a few hundred rounds it means nothing to me to weight the loaded rounds.

Quote:
QC checks in my reloading process
Again, a shooter standing next to me at the range could not pull the trigger, he could not open the cylinder he could not pull the hammer back because his Model 66 was locked up with a bullet. I put my stuff up in an effort to help him, I drove the bullet back into the case and then emptied his cylinder. The first thing he did was start shoving rounds into his cylinder. I wanted him to convinced me his reloads were safe and the missing powder from one case did not get added to the next cases, and all he did was get mad. Long story.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old October 20, 2017, 09:03 PM   #27
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by F. Guffey
A disciplined reloaders knows the weight of the case, bullet and powder charge and then there is the weight of the primer. And then there are those reloaders that do not have a clue, they do not know if they have the correct powder charge, they do not know the weight of the case and they do not know the weight spread on the bullets.

For me there is nothing entertaining about pulling the trigger without a hint of what is about to happen. I have enough cases to match the weight of the case so after I load a few hundred rounds it means nothing to me to weight the loaded rounds.
I knew that I had loaded some with 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 grains of Bullseye, but I didn't keep track of which they were. My guess is that the squib was a 1.0 load because as I shot the rest of these uncommon handloads and didn't have another squib with them.

Bottom line is for this load there is no "correct powder charge" because no currently printed manuals exist that offer data for using round balls as projectiles. It's called trial and error and I'm a trail blazer and I knew the load was so light the gun wasn't going to blow and that was good enough for me.

After shooting these loads and paying I forget what for the round balls, it's probably cheaper and better to buy 75 grain lead bullets and using them instead. There is established data out there for such a bullet.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03668 seconds with 10 queries