The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 13, 2009, 10:36 PM   #1
flyguy958
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 200
Interference Fit Question

How much interference fit is optimum for bullet fit in a bolt action 243 Win and 30-06? Searching seems to find most do not crimp for these calibers in a bolt gun. I am using Lee collet neck size dies and have read that I need to reduce the size of the pilot on the die. Just wondering what the general consensus is on proper fit.
flyguy958 is offline  
Old December 14, 2009, 04:33 PM   #2
wncchester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
"Just wondering what the general consensus is on proper fit. "

There really isn't one. And, saying "interference fit" is using the proper term, it's actually not "neck tension" as most refer to it, at all.

Most standard FL expander plugs will normally leave mouths 2 or 3 thou undersize while cases from most Collet die will run from 1 or 2 thou under, both depending largely on how hard the brass itself is. Harder brass tends to spring back more and that means a slighter tighter fit with standard dies. But that effect is reversed with the Lee collet, cases from it springs back larger each use so annealing from time to time is in order.

Many folks talk of wanting a lot of bullet 'tension', 3 to 5 thou, as if it's some kind of anvantage. It isn't, certainly not more than maybe 3 thou anyway because the brass is simply stretched passed its elastic limits at that difference. So, going smaller than 3 is a mistake, IMHO.

I also think it can be proven that the higher pressure requiired to seat a bullet in a case that's significantly smaller than it need be WILL produce undesirable tilt (run-out) when the bullet enters the mouth.

Seems Lee has it right when they strive for only 1 thou of interference fit in an already straight neck! The good neck sizer plus a proper diameter neck tends to make for much straighter ammo and that makes for smaller groups!
wncchester is offline  
Old December 14, 2009, 08:39 PM   #3
gearheadpyro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 3, 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 169
+1

Their really isn't any consensus other than what works best for you. I don't reload for those calibers, but in my .308 I run about .004" interferance. I anneal my brass though so it tends to be softer and resize easier.

I do crimp my .308's using the Lee Factory Crimp Die and have had fantastic results with it, you may not. At $10 though I feel it's worth trying.
__________________
www.southernmarksman.com
Owner of & Chief Instructor for The Southern Marksman, LLC
NRA Life Member, NRA CRSO, Multi-Discipline NRA Certified Instructor
gearheadpyro is offline  
Old December 14, 2009, 10:48 PM   #4
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,057
Wncchester hit it. There is a limit to how much additional tension you get from making the neck smaller. Beyond a point the bullet just acts like its own expander, making the neck wider, but not increasing tension appreciably, for the reason he gave. I also agree 0.001" to 0.002" is a good interference fit number. Like all things related to reloading, consistency is the main ingredient, often more so than the absolute values. You may find you need to anneal more often when producing only a slight interference fit, as the collet die does, so the interference remains constant and is not diminished by work hardening. Some find they need to take a little off those collet die mandrels for their brass, but I've not had to do so yet. I think that is about annealing rather than needing more tension.

If you want to check the interference fit you are getting, just seat a bullet's bearing surface half way into the neck and measure the neck O.D. difference at the lower and upper halves. That is, where the brass is stretched over the bullet and where it is not. If you don't own a blade micrometer, a dial caliper is easiest for this task as you can see fractional thousands on the dial, where a digital that is rounding up may not show the difference at all.

On another board we have a former Aberdeen Proving Ground employee who did testing and failure investigations there. He points out that aging the ammo tends to increase tension, but not consistently. You may need, say, 60 lbs to seat a bullet, but he's seen pull up to 600 pounds just from it getting a few years old. Still shot fine to military grouping requirements, which are not tight by target shooting standards. But as a target shooter, that cold weld inconsistency is not helpful, so you do better not to load too far ahead of need for accuracy ammo.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old December 15, 2009, 12:06 PM   #5
flyguy958
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 200
Thanks for the replies, and I'll try to remember "neck tension".

I did not consider aging to be a factor, but I see where it could have some definite affects. Seems all the little things add up.

Seeing that the temper of the brass has a good bit to do with how the sizing die preforms it also stands to reason the same neck tension with different brass hardness will result in a totally different "grip" on the bullet.
flyguy958 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05826 seconds with 8 queries