November 19, 2006, 02:49 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2006
Location: California
Posts: 441
|
Obese bg's
As Americans become increasingly obese, should law abiding citizens in the US consider using increasingly powerful loads to defend themselves from rotound assailants?
|
November 19, 2006, 03:02 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2006
Posts: 504
|
Makes sense to me.
|
November 19, 2006, 03:10 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Location: Youngtown Arizona
Posts: 1,135
|
You might also consider a larger caliber for cold weather , Id guess layers of heavy clothes is harder to penitrate than a few inches of fat
|
November 19, 2006, 03:20 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2005
Location: Goldendale, Washington
Posts: 439
|
thats a good questionq
i think we should consult TBOT on this. Myabe get some heavy coats, vs defense rounds.
And then some fat (maybe actual animal fat or gelatin) vs defense rounds
__________________
I aint the worlds best writer nor the best speller But when i believe in something i'm the loudest yeller. Woody Guthrie |
November 19, 2006, 06:39 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
|
|
November 19, 2006, 08:32 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 2006
Location: Marysville Washington
Posts: 291
|
it does kind of make since. I would worry about 2 inches of extra muscle more then 5-10 inches of extra fat though. But clothing is the big concern especially for hollow points.
|
November 19, 2006, 09:31 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2005
Posts: 249
|
On morbidly obese opponents, the apron of fat tends to contraindicate pelvic shots.
On frontal shots, whether opponent is hugely obese or hugely muscular, there will be little extra covering the sternum. When in doubt, neither fat nor muscle protects the head. |
November 19, 2006, 09:59 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,173
|
What?
You never heard of a Fathead? Sorry, couldn't resist. Good points, especially the sternum and head. |
November 19, 2006, 10:13 AM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 28, 2006
Posts: 509
|
Are we seriously discussing this? Really? This is for real?
WOW |
November 19, 2006, 11:59 AM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
And is it just me, or does anybody else find it ironic that this thread was started by someone with the username "freetacos"? |
|
November 19, 2006, 12:31 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 15, 2006
Posts: 576
|
I am left.....
...speechless
|
November 19, 2006, 01:08 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 17, 2006
Posts: 138
|
if BG's are getting progressively fat then it makes it easier to simply outrun them--unless you're just as out of shape. Then yeah i guess getting some .50 AE is like getting ahead of the curve.
[sarcasm off] |
November 19, 2006, 01:31 PM | #13 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
|
This thread's less than 12 hours old, and it already took the low road. I wonder if that's a new record?
The subject of body mass and heavy clothing is a good one. Feel free to restart it, minus the references to minorities, etc., but this one's closed.
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you? I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do. --Capt. Charlie |
November 19, 2006, 01:32 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2005
Posts: 2,536
|
Quote:
As far as penetration is concerned, I would concern myself with muscle mass over fat mass do to density. I read an article once that stated a cop shot a guy 5 times with reduced recoil #4 buckshot at ranges of 10-20 yards. He hit front back and side. None of the pellets penetrated the thoracic cavity. |
|
|
|