December 1, 2014, 08:54 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 1999
Location: Chihuahuan desert, Texas
Posts: 1,148
|
Mailing a stripped lower
I have several new stripped AR lowers. Is it legal for me, a non-FFL, to use the USPS to mail one to a FFL since it is neither rifle nor handgun?
__________________
Join the GOA, SAF and the TSRA I'm offended by people that are easily offended. |
December 1, 2014, 09:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2010
Location: Not far enough from Chicago
Posts: 394
|
I don't think it's legal to use the us postal service. The lower is still a firearm.
|
December 1, 2014, 09:26 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,073
|
USPS only allows licensed dealers and manufacturers to mail a firearm other than a rifle or shotgun.
Firearm frames, receivers and AR lowers are firearms and capable of being concealed on the body.......therefore mailable only by licensed dealers and manufacturers. The good news is...............they aren't handguns. Which means they can be shipped via UPS Ground or FedEx Ground.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
December 1, 2014, 09:52 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 506
|
A lower is considered a firearm and all rules apply. Need to send via something other than USPS and notify shippler.
|
December 1, 2014, 09:55 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 1999
Location: Chihuahuan desert, Texas
Posts: 1,148
|
Thanks again, dog town.
Moderator, please close this post.
__________________
Join the GOA, SAF and the TSRA I'm offended by people that are easily offended. |
December 1, 2014, 10:22 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
According to the BATFE, a receiver that has not yet been built into a rifle or a handgun is neither -- it is a "receiver." I think this is what gives rise to burrhead's question, and I respectfully suggest that so far nobody has given a completely responsive answer. (Except Dogtown Tom, as usual.) I don't think the USPS regulations even address unbuilt receivers. If that's the case, an argument could be made that "That which is not illegal ... is legal." That said, I don't think I would knowingly volunteer to become the test case. |
|
December 1, 2014, 11:34 PM | #7 | ||||||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
||||||
December 2, 2014, 06:19 AM | #8 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
432.2.d seems to be pretty clear: Quote:
In fact, is an unbuilt receiver even a firearm? It isn't capable of expelling a projectile, so by most legal definitions it isn't. I concede that it's probably not allowed, but I don't see a crystal clear path to documenting it. |
||
December 2, 2014, 08:06 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
I think the bolded part covers it.
a. Handgun (including pistols and revolvers) means any firearm which has a short stock, and is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand and subject to 431.1, or a combination of parts from which a handgun can be assembled. |
December 2, 2014, 10:00 AM | #10 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
My emphasis in boldface and my notes in [brackets]: Quote:
The key to mailability for a non-licensee is that the firearm must be a shotgun or a rifle per the USPS definitions. Since we're discussing AR lowers, I'll disregard shotguns. Definition of a rifle: Quote:
Quote:
If ANY of the other criteria aren't met- the barrel is under 16" long (or absent), the assembled unit is under 26" OAL, and/or there is no shoulder stock- it is treated as a handgun pursuant to 431.2. Whether it's actually a "handgun" or "short-barreled rifle" doesn't really matter, as the USPS treats all "firearms capable of being concealed on the person" fundamentally the same way. (Remember, this is the USPS and NOT the ATF.) *Footnote: The serial numbering rule does not apply to pre-1968 non-serialized firearms, homebuilt receivers, or so-called "80%" receivers, but for the sake of brevity, let's not go there.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; December 2, 2014 at 04:04 PM. Reason: reword for brevity, final corrections and cleanup |
||||
December 2, 2014, 05:18 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,073
|
Ya'll are missing one very important point of 432.2
USPS (for some unknown reason) classifies firearms capable of being concealed on the body as "Handguns" for the purposes of mailability. A firearm frame or receiver is still a firearm, and with few exceptions can easily be concealed......as can many Silencers, SBR's, SBS's and AOW's. Quote:
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
|
December 2, 2014, 05:32 PM | #12 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
I think the key is from this part of the regulations, cited by Dogtown Tom: Quote:
|
||
December 3, 2014, 10:16 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
For future reference...
I did a write-up in the stickied "How to ship firearms" thread in General Discussion.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
December 3, 2014, 06:22 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Thanks, Chris. Nice job.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|