|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 22, 2014, 09:43 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Anti-gun state senator carries while protesting
They need to put this woman's picture in the dictionary where it defines "hypocrite".
On the plus side, she carries it "every single day". She had a permit but failed to show it to the police. http://news.yahoo.com/video/missouri...001008924.html From http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...ti-gun-bills/: Quote:
|
|
October 22, 2014, 10:08 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
This is the same senator who wanted to make it a criminal offense to fail to report theft of a firearm within 72 hours, and who sponsored a bill [pdf] that would require parents to inform their children's school if there was a gun in the house.
Here she is exhibiting a shocking lack of responsible mindset or training.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
October 22, 2014, 10:30 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,324
|
Sincerity and politics are not common bedfellows.
__________________
Proud NRA Benefactor Member |
October 22, 2014, 10:36 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: October 15, 2014
Posts: 15
|
The most surprising part of this is that this woman holds elected office.
I won't speak to the allegations of intoxicants or the breathalyzer refusal because frankly... I would not submit to anything designed to provide evidence against me either... But... Not notifying officers that your armed and have a CCW is certainly grounds to loose her CCW. If you want to carry a gun, refuse LEO requests and refuse to ID yourself, there is a perfectly legal way to do it in most jurisdictions. Open Carry. Tack |
October 22, 2014, 03:39 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
So, other than another elitist with a "good for me, none for thee" attitude, what do we have here? if anything?
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
October 22, 2014, 04:19 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Shocked, I say, shocked I am! Who would have thought such a thing.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
October 22, 2014, 04:28 PM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Quote:
Quote:
Assuming a failed field sobriety test: Can you refuse a BAC test while driving? Can you refuse a BAC test while "walking" in the street? Can you refuse a BAC test while carrying concealed IF Carrying Concealed is a privilege not a right because unlicensed Open Carry is a right? Not all states require officer notification, even if common sense does. |
||
October 22, 2014, 04:36 PM | #8 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
If the laws of her state require it, she should have complied. If the laws of her state don't require it ... why should not doing something that's NOT legally required be grounds for loss of her permit? According to www.handgunlaw.us Missouri does NOT require officer notification. Quote:
I certainly agree, though, that she is the personification of hypocrite. Oh ... and it's "lose," not "loose." |
||
October 22, 2014, 05:29 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: October 15, 2014
Posts: 15
|
Perhaps she broke no law by not disclosing her armed status but I'm pretty sure she is in violation of having her gun and not having her CCW on her... Or perhaps she did and no one asked about it.
...but upon discovery of the gun, WHEN your getting arrested anyway, who wouldn't offer up their CCW to avoid an additional charge? I think the answer is a hypocritical politician looking to get her name in the paper. Tack Last edited by Evan Thomas; October 23, 2014 at 05:45 PM. Reason: no name-calling, please. |
October 22, 2014, 07:41 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
Missouri is not a "must notify" state. She did nothing illegal by not notifying them of her firearm on her person... as to the wisdom of not disclosing that and doing something to deliberately get arrested, well, I'm not so sure that's a great idea. But it's not itself illegal.
And yes, she is a rabid anti-gun state congresswoman. There's several of those from that part of the STL area. But then again, rabid anti-gunners with CCW permits, although certainly hypocritical, are hardly thin on the ground. There's more than a few of those in the federal government too. |
October 23, 2014, 09:19 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
While interesting from a purely legal/procedural/technical standpoint I think we're loosing the signal in the noise here.
An avowed anti-gunner was caught carrying a gun. Its an issue of integrity & honesty not a procedural contretemps that is the issue here.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
October 23, 2014, 10:02 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,157
|
^^^^^^ What he said.
__________________
Geetarman Carpe Cerveza |
October 23, 2014, 12:10 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Quote:
In my state, you CAN refuse the breath test (under certain conditions). HOWEVER, doing so means an automatic loss of license/suspension. If you were involved in an accident, you will get tested, and if there is injury involved it will be a blood test, with chain of evidence maintained.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
|
|