The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 21, 2019, 05:38 AM   #1
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,888
RIP Benchmade Knives

Benchmade Knives has been exposed as an anti gun company after social media posts of the Oregon City Police Department showed pictures of guns being destroyed by Benchmade.

The post was deleted, but some have screenshots saved of it.



Further revelations have come out that Benchmade overwhelmingly contributes to local anti-gun Democrats campaigns.

I was never interested in Benchmade knives, but now I'm plain shocked by this activity as I doubt it's the first time Benchmade has done this. It's sad and uncomfortable, but I'd rather know the uncomfortable truth over a fake facade.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 09:11 AM   #2
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
From what I understand, the guns were from folks that didn't want them anymore or guns used in crimes. What other folks do with their personal property is their business. I don't see an issue with any company helping out a LE organization for free. I didn't see anything about Benchmade being anti-gun, only pro-cop.

So..........are you anti-cop?
buck460XVR is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 11:23 AM   #3
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
Another reason to blame and sacrifice the firearm.

TruthTellers

Thanks for the heads-up although I don't own any of their knives. ….

Quote:
From what I understand, the guns were from folks that didn't want them anymore or guns used in crimes.
Once again, another reason to blame and sacrifice the firearm. I feel so much safer seeing these "Evil" guns, off the street. ……

Once helped a buddy move and he gave me a couple of old SxS's. when he gave them to me, he stated that when he was 5yr's old, his mother had committed suicide with one of them but was not sure, which on. Always thought that his right to destroy it. ….

Both SxS's cleaned up very nicely …..

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 11:31 AM   #4
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Destroying firearms that are destined to be destroyed is a non-issue.
In many places, crime guns are required by law to be destroyed. As much as it may hurt to see or think about for gun enthusiasts, it is the law. Once a firearm is ordered destroyed, there's little (if anything) that can be done to save it. It's the way our world works.

If they are, in fact, contributing to anti-gun groups or candidates (which does appear to be the case, but only with meager donations), that could be another matter. ...But probably not.
The only reason I have owned Benchmade knives (and still have one) is because each and every one of them was given to me. I won't pay what Benchmade wants for their products. So, what they do with their money doesn't really matter to me.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 11:47 AM   #5
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pahoo View Post


Once again, another reason to blame and sacrifice the firearm. I feel so much safer seeing these "Evil" guns, off the street. ……
What are the odds that any of those guns could be readily and easily bought at your local gun shop? I had an old semi-auto .22 that would fire in full auto when it got dirty. Destroyed it instead of letting it get into the hands of someone else. No blame or sacrifice. Again, what so many folks are upset about, is not that unwanted guns are being destroyed, but that they can't have them instead, even tho most are easily obtained otherwise. Again, what concern is it of yours if someone else want to destroy their property, regardless of their reasons? How does that hurt you? How does destroying unwanted guns hurt pro-gun folks? Does crushing old unwanted cars take away my right to buy a new one? Heck of a lot of other firearms out there readily available for me to get upset over a few, other folks don't want anymore.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 12:29 PM   #6
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
Strictly Political !!

Quote:
How does destroying unwanted guns hurt pro-gun folks?
The firearms in question were not private property and destroying them by any Government is strictly a political ploy to appease the Anti-Gunners. ……

As far as being unwanted or seemingly worthless; well, that is not the case. Whether functional or not, there is still value. You just haven't figured out, HOW !!! Look into it …..

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 12:40 PM   #7
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pahoo View Post
The firearms in question were not private property and destroying them by any Government is strictly a political ploy to appease the Anti-Gunners. ……

As far as being unwanted or seemingly worthless; well, that is not the case. Whether functional or not, there is still value. You just haven't figured out, HOW !!! Look into it …..

Be Safe !!!
From the Oregon City Police.......

Read the line...."These guns were required to be destroyed"

....nuff said.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Gunzz.jpg (206.6 KB, 74 views)
buck460XVR is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 01:42 PM   #8
viciouskitty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 316
I think the outrage is stemming from the fact that they chose to participate in the destruction of the guns. If I personally ran a company and I didn’t agree with the firearms destruction I would never get involved. The fact that they did shows that they at least have no issue with dumb laws like that. Unlike other places that do not destroy seized firearms and instead sell them to help fund police departments.
viciouskitty is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 01:46 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankenMauser
In many places, crime guns are required by law to be destroyed. As much as it may hurt to see or think about for gun enthusiasts, it is the law. Once a firearm is ordered destroyed, there's little (if anything) that can be done to save it. It's the way our world works.
It is my understanding that it is NOT the law in Oregon that evidence guns must be destroyed. The Oregon City PD could have auctioned them off. This was a virtue signaling operation by all parties involved.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 01:59 PM   #10
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
I don’t care either way really, but I do have to question why publicize it.
I’ve thought about forging gun barrels into trinkets and peac signs lol.
rickyrick is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 02:22 PM   #11
dstryr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2012
Location: IA
Posts: 132
Quote:
Read the line...."These guns were required to be destroyed"
Ahhh.. the 'we were just following orders' requirement. It would help if for once quoted 'policy' had an origin.

But no... its easier to say it was 'a requirement' instead of actually quoting a law, ordinance or policy-maker(with a name and face).

I loathe government and cops, or their spokespeople, who hide behind ambiguity.
__________________
dstryr, since 1986.

http://www.dstryr.com/
dstryr is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 02:29 PM   #12
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,985
Liberalism has creeped into a lot of brains, apparently.
Destroying guns is always a political ploy-required by law or not.
I have seen articles that state that Benchmade is a heavy Democratic contributor.
Being a knife designer, I have dealt with this company. The owner is a shrewd businessman that really cares nothing about knives-nor do his minions. They are simply "product" to them. Benchmade has tried to corner the market on US automatic knife production.
I wouldn't miss them if they disappeared.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 02:45 PM   #13
spacemanspiff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 3,498
Sometimes local gunsmith shops are asked to destroy firearms set for destruction by the ATF. Does that make the gunsmiths anti-gun?
__________________
"Every man alone is sincere; at the entrance of a second person hypocrisy begins." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kierkegaard
spacemanspiff is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 02:47 PM   #14
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
Virtue signaling. Don't recall too many news stories showing illegal drugs or counterfeit money being destroyed.
SIGSHR is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 04:26 PM   #15
NWPilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
PD went to a knife company for destruction of firearms instead of a local gunsmith because ...

Can’t think of a reason. Looks like a publicity stunt that backfired. If I was going to chop up guns I would first think of “who has tools to cut thick steel?” Like pipefitters. Gas line outfits. Probably the City public works sewer pipe crew. A knife maker would be quite a ways down my brainstorm list.
NWPilgrim is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 04:45 PM   #16
Sevens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
Any organization that is actually forced by (dumb) laws to destroy firearms is a fiscally ignorant organization if they aren't putting the effort in to separating all parts from the frame first and then de-milling the frame. There is real money here, and ANY organization that exists from taxing the population is ignoring that revenue stream and tossing money in to the toilet -- while continuing to take it from the tax paying public.

The number of parts kits of "required" de-milled guns sold daily on Gunbroker is merely the easiest example to be found.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 05:59 PM   #17
50 shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2002
Location: SoCal PRK
Posts: 986
Sorry but BM screwed up, their reply and the OCPD's reply was BS! They could've sold them per OR law, the sheriff is a big time anti gunner!

Plenty of info out there that the last time they used the cities tools to dispose of them. Why did BM feel the need to help them out? Specialized tools my ass, a chop saw and a grinder?! How about a torch?

Then look at BM's political donations, they've given thousands to anti gun politicians over the years! Again, all of this is online for anyone to look up for themselves.

If it was knives being chopped up or banned in OR, would they be crying foul or helping?

To bad, so sad, good bye BM!
__________________
I see the world thru bloodshot eyes
Streets filled with blood from distant lies
The dogs of war never compromise,
No time for rearranging.
50 shooter is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 06:44 PM   #18
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
Seems everyone wants to please Twitter nowadays.

Too bad we can’t see if proper PPE is being used, and I see one person with some jewelry on.
rickyrick is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 06:48 PM   #19
Eazyeach
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2014
Posts: 706
I’ve never bought a benchmade knife because of the high prices they charge. My $60 SOG Flash 2 is as good as any $150 benchmade. That being said , I’ve got better things to do with my time than giving a rip about what some knife company’s politics are.

Don’t like it , don’t buy it. Like it, buy it.
Eazyeach is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 07:43 PM   #20
Redneckrepairs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 9, 2006
Posts: 666
Now that some are tripping over them selves to excuse the firearm destruction , lets just see how they explain away the political contributions

https://gununiversity.com/is-benchma...pany-anti-gun/
Redneckrepairs is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 08:04 PM   #21
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
That pic in the first post looks like an illegal sawed-off shotgun to me. They cut the barrel without destroying the receiver first.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 08:16 PM   #22
cjwils
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2010
Location: Washington state
Posts: 401
I am not defending Benchmark, but consider this: They are in a community (Portland metro area) where virtually all politicians are pretty far left and probably anti-gun. Benchmark is probably secretly terrified that the anti-gunners will become anti-knifers. That is why they give to local politicians; to buy goodwill. Think anti-knife policies won't happen? It has already happened in England.
cjwils is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 08:56 PM   #23
Wag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 988
My hangup with them is that they are donating to anti-gun democrats. The NM dem they donate to is definitely anti-gun, regardless.

Here's a decent write up: https://gununiversity.com/is-benchma...pany-anti-gun/

I have a Benchmade that I inherited from my brother-in-law. It's a decent knife that I have in my daily load out. I doubt I'll pitch it over this but I doubt I'll buy another unless BM starts donating to the NRA or GOA or something similar.

--Wag--
__________________
"Great genius will always encounter fierce opposition from mediocre minds." --Albert Einstein.
Wag is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 09:11 PM   #24
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
The guns belonged to the state of Oregon either because the previous owners no longer wanted them or because of forfeiture due to criminal use. They were ordered to be destroyed by a judge. Nothing wrong with that, they own 'em can do with them as they wish. It's not like legally owned guns were confiscated and destroyed.

The local LE had neither the skills nor equipment to destroy the guns. Benchmade did and allowed their equipment to be used. Good on them for assisting local LE.

None of this says anything about where anyone stands on gun rights. Maybe they are anti, maybe not. But this is a big no story here.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old February 21, 2019, 09:13 PM   #25
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
I’m sure there’s angle grinders and a workbench at the city and county maintenance facilities, just saying
rickyrick is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11519 seconds with 9 queries