The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 19, 2019, 06:40 AM   #1
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
.243 Win w/Speer 75 HP bullet

I've been working up loads with this bullet and am a bit miffed. Using 38.0 grains of Shooters World Tactical (Similar to BL-C(2)....got an appalling 2,732 FPS with a lousy SD. Moving to Shooters World Precision (Similar to Varget) :

44.0 Grains 2,904 FPS/ 9.16 SD (Very good accuracy)

44.5 Grains 2,878 FPS/76.3

IOW the velocity dropped and the SD went way up with an increase of just 0.5 grains.

Looking at Hodgdon Manual---

38.5 Varget------3,408 FPS

37.5 BL-C(2)-----3,185

I am bewildered ...and need a recommendation for a powder that will produce a decent velocity in the 3,200~3,400 FPS range...has anyone worked on loads for this caliber & bullet?
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 07:10 AM   #2
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,715
I typically load 95-100gr bullets for the 243 win nowadays, but, when I loaded lighter ones like 75 gr bullets I had very good results with IMR 4064 and H380. Both should get you the velocity you are looking for, with potentially great accuracy.
edit - Also, go buy a pound of Varget- and see how it does for you. Its a great choice for the 243
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 07:37 AM   #3
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
Thank you....H-380 seems like the logical choice; I was hoping for some feedback with someone who has used it w/ the 75 Speer HP bullet.
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 09:39 AM   #4
hdbiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2012
Posts: 297
My Tikka .243 likes 70-75 grain anything over IMR 4064. With 100 grain .243's it likes IMR 4350 All will print an inch or better. hdbiker
hdbiker is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 06:19 PM   #5
CarJunkieLS1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2013
Posts: 686
So you used BLC-2 and Varget data for powders that are "similar" well that's not the right way to do things and you need published reliable data for the actual powder you are using.

STOP what you are doing reevaluate your loading practices and BE SAFE! If the powders you tried were the same as BLC2 and Varget then you'd see similar velocities, and you aren't so clearly they aren't similar at all and you are playing with fire.
CarJunkieLS1 is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 06:31 PM   #6
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
I contacted Shooters World for the Load data I used with Tactical & Precision. I mentioned out that Shooters World's pamphlet states that these powders are similar in burning rate to BLC2 and Varget...with no inference that one can use the same loading data for them.
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 06:53 PM   #7
CarJunkieLS1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2013
Posts: 686
Ok I guess I was confused because I saw no mention of actual SW powder data all I saw was you were saying similar powder and posted data for 2 powders you didn't use.

I guess the SW data they gave you just isn't fast enough for you. Don't blame you either. I'm getting 3200 from a 75hp from an AR-15 Wildcat. Using less powder too.

I guess Varget and BLC2 is what you need to try.
CarJunkieLS1 is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 08:59 PM   #8
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
I should probably have mentioned it. The loads with Precision were quite accurate at 200 yards..just about equal to my .22-250 Rem Varmintmaster, but just too slow.
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 19, 2019, 11:13 PM   #9
Sure Shot Mc Gee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
I've used Speers._ But eventually switched to Hornady 75s H-P because of their ultra slim explosive profile._ The powder my 243 preferred was IMR 4831 and Federal brass.
As I recall.
The 4831 powder charging tipped with a Horn 75 Hp its velocity was near 3500 fps. Still have the rifle but its been retired for awhile. >Ruger M-77 243 Flat Bolt.
"A surprisingly accurate rifle."
Sure Shot Mc Gee is offline  
Old May 20, 2019, 06:49 AM   #10
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
Thank you, Sure Shot.....!

Hornady's 75 HP # 2420 is discontinued--it had a BC of .294 vs .192 for the Speer bullet. Hornady has replaced theirs with a V-max version with a plastic tip and a BC of .330. I don't shoot more than 250 yards, so the Speer version is good enough for me,

Last edited by Wallyl; May 20, 2019 at 07:03 AM. Reason: adding
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 20, 2019, 04:53 PM   #11
BeeShooter
Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2016
Posts: 85
I would suggest using the 10 round load development ladder. It looks like you have a chrono and if you've got good case prep where each case is similar such as FL and bullet grip. I normally use 4166,varget,4350, and 4451. I'll start with about.2 over max and drop .2 of a grain for the next 9 loads. (loading only one round at each charge). Mark and use the highest speed node. Then you can load a string of 3 or 4 to gauge the best jump.
BeeShooter is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 07:30 AM   #12
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
BeeShooter, Thanks for the suggestion, which I plan on doing.
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 02:04 PM   #13
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
Shooters World Tactical doesn't appear to list any 75 grain data or .243 data using their Tactical Rifle powder. However, 44.0 of it is the START load for a 125/130 grain .308 Win load.
Like CarJunkieLS1 says, what you're doing by just substituting powders is not safe. There is no such thing as "similar" when it comes to gun powders. Data is not interchangeable between cartridges.
Used 75 grain bullets, long ago, in my .243. H414, I think. It's more like very long ago. Switched to 90 and 105 grain Speers with IMR4350.
"...about .2 over max..." That's not how reloading is done either.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 03:19 PM   #14
Wallyl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2011
Posts: 255
T. O Heir

I contacted SW and they gave me some loading data specifically for the .243 Win w/ the Speer 75 HP # 1205 bullet. Their ballistician is to get back to me later this week with data for their MATCH powder. I am not into loading it to just before the gun blows up.

The purpose of this thread was to find out what loads others are using in this caliber and with this bullet....more on an advisory basis, as I know one should be wary of any loads offered on the I-net. I was miffed that the SW powder loads mentioned had such low velocities. I also know that increasing the powder charges is not a wise idea.
Wallyl is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 06:49 PM   #15
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,415
I shoot Hornady 75 Vmax over IMR 4064 in my 700 Varmint for 3100+. Also shoots 5 in one hole.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 07:06 PM   #16
2ndtimer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 292
While I haven't loaded the Speer 75 gr HP in decades, I have recently put together some very nice loads with the Speer 70 gr TNT using a maximum load of Ramshot Big Game . You might try some Big Game with those 75 gr HP's. It was able to push the 70 gr TNT almost 3500 fps out of a 22" barrel.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member
2ndtimer is offline  
Old May 21, 2019, 09:48 PM   #17
ammo.crafter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,967
Agree with mike...

I use same powder with Speer 75 gr bullets in my 6mm. Extremely accurate power/bullet combo.
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
--Thomas Jefferson
ammo.crafter is offline  
Old May 22, 2019, 05:19 AM   #18
BeeShooter
Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2016
Posts: 85
T.O'Heir - I think you opinion of how things are to be is a little bias. If you follow the published load data you'll never find the rifle's maximum efficiency. I reload to produce accuracy and velocity at its maximum. Nothing is a substitute for accuracy. This statement alone differentiates our philosophy of shooting. You may feel that it's never necessary to shoot beyond 300 yards or have a group inside of a .3 moa or have very tight velocities. All this is fine for the general shooter and a stock rifle. I'm not a general shooter with a stock rifle and factory ammo. Whether I'm reloading 2 full grains over published or not, I always open my post by stating a suggestion or opinion. Try not to convince the reader that you know all.
BeeShooter is offline  
Old May 22, 2019, 06:31 AM   #19
CarJunkieLS1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2013
Posts: 686
Gotta go with TO Heir on this one...he said that starting. 2 over max and then reducing charge isn't how it's done. He's 100% correct.

Start LOW and work UP. Not Up then Down. Now going slightly over max in your rifle with your combo may be fine BUT it's to be worked up slowly and carefully NOT all willy nilly and .2 over max to start is just asking for trouble. .2 over after a careful load work up not a big deal to me.
CarJunkieLS1 is offline  
Old May 22, 2019, 12:59 PM   #20
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...If you follow the published load data you'll never find the rifle's maximum efficiency..." That is absolute nonsense.
Reloading 2 full grains over published is unsafe plain and simple is not an opinion. It's a fact. Starting over max is 100% unsafe. One does NOT start at .2 over and work down. One begins with the start load and works up. Please read your manual. Assuming you have such a thing.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old May 22, 2019, 01:56 PM   #21
CarJunkieLS1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2013
Posts: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. O'Heir View Post
"...If you follow the published load data you'll never find the rifle's maximum efficiency..." That is absolute nonsense.
Reloading 2 full grains over published is unsafe plain and simple is not an opinion. It's a fact. Starting over max is 100% unsafe. One does NOT start at .2 over and work down. One begins with the start load and works up. Please read your manual. Assuming you have such a thing.
You are right. And OP please take a seat back and reevaluate your loading habits, it's fun working with different combos and seeing your results but above all BE SAFE! You can't replace body parts
CarJunkieLS1 is offline  
Old May 24, 2019, 03:27 AM   #22
BeeShooter
Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2016
Posts: 85
For the most part I concede that, technically, it's not always the best to proceed with above published load data. Bullet and powder manufacturers produce said data. Many times you'll find Hodgdon powder loads being suggested by bullet companies that are not recommended by Hodgdon. You'll also find Sierra load data with much higher loads that recommend by other published loads. There's a lot of variables to contend with. I can only suggest that when reloading, use best practices and never ever use any flammable substance in the case prep or bullet seating. You'll find out that all max load data is conservative. I argue that when working with powder loads you'll find that your best load will be around 90% to 107% of max published( pending where you get your data). Some even more but few less. How you get there is your business. If you're uncomfortable working with maximum powder loads or compressed powder loads then don't. PS. Don't ever take another shooter's powder load data as "good-to-go". Always research it first. Human memory isn't always accurate. Good Luck.
BeeShooter is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09490 seconds with 10 queries