|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 13, 2017, 03:08 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 757
|
military use of .22lr (and other "minor" handgun calibers)
I guess back in the Vietnam era, the .22lr still had kind of a niche role in the military for taking out sentry dogs and the like.
I guess with all the development in large caliber suppressors, there is no more use for this tiny caliber in the military context? It#s just that a good suppressed .22lr is really close to "silent" while a 9mm or a .45 with a can still makes some noise... The same goes for other "minor" calibers like .32acp or .380 - afaik these where in limited use up to the 80ies with higher ranks and bodyguards etc. due to the petit size of the corresponding weapons, but with all the miniaturization I reckon this niche is obsolete as well? Maybe someone knows of some special military use up until today...?
__________________
"Get off of my lawn!" Walt Kowalski . ISSC PAR .223 |
November 13, 2017, 03:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,000
|
Israelis use 10/22
to shoot stonethrowers in the legs so kinda little more than less-lethal or something the maerican 180 was used in Rhodesia |
November 13, 2017, 03:34 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Back in the 50s and 60s, in the Corps one could shoot .22 pistols and rifles. Dad noted he shot a buttload of .22 while in the states and Greenland (or Iceland, not sure). They did not have these facilities in Korea (that whole war thing) and his other locations. This was M1 and later M14 days.
|
November 13, 2017, 05:17 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,289
|
Quote:
|
|
November 13, 2017, 05:56 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,878
|
The 1903 Colt Pocket Hammerless pistols in .32 ACP were issued to high ranking officers in the US military from the 30's until the 70's. Not really used in combat, but they were issued.
.32 ACP Welrod pistols were used by British and US in WW2, possibly even after the 40's. The Welrod is just a good design for as silent as possible, but still reliable and more effective than .22 LR. I don't think any .380's have ever been used with military forces likely because the 9mm would suffice and be a much better choice. IDK, maybe some country used the MAC-11 for super special forces?
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
November 13, 2017, 06:10 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
|
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruger_MK_II |
|
November 13, 2017, 06:53 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Amity Oregon
Posts: 791
|
Some of the Colt General Officers pistols were .380. 380 was used by a number of
militaries---but not by that name. 9mm Kurz, Corto, Short, Kratak---all the same 9x18 round. |
November 13, 2017, 08:55 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 8, 2016
Location: Cleveland, Ohio Suburbs
Posts: 1,750
|
Colt did manufacture a .22 - .45 conversion kit for the 1911 .45 ACP pistols. During my Marine Corps years (1969 - 1978) I had heard of them but never saw one. Like Vietnam in 1972 you would hear about things (Rumor Control Central) but never see them. I don't know when Colt stopped making the .22 - .45 conversion kits for sale to the US Government. Mine is a Colt commercial version. There were a good number of .22 LR rifles used for training purposes and also several survival rifles the Air Force liked for bomber crews. Not a clue what still may be in use today.
Ron |
November 13, 2017, 11:32 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2016
Location: Atlanta, Georgia area
Posts: 455
|
I believe that in the mid-50's Air Force survival rifles were .22 Hornet.
.22 Hornet was very popular back then. Every farm kid in Iowa had one of those .22 Hornet over 20 ga. under firearms. |
November 14, 2017, 02:42 AM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
|
November 14, 2017, 06:32 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,148
|
Israel military used it for riot control, but it turned out to be too lethal. The navy SEALS used a supressed Ruger Mark II in the 90's for a while. The CIA's field agents also carried suppressed .22s in urban environments. I believe mossad is still using the 10/22.
__________________
Flicks just like a lighter, just a different kind of fire. |
November 14, 2017, 03:33 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...380's have ever been used with military forces..." MP's and civilian Police in Europe. General Isaac White( 2nd Armored Div. W.W. II) was issued a .380-caliber Model 1908 in 1945. Quite a few U.S. General officers had .380's.
"...reckon this niche is obsolete..." More about budgets than anything else. 7.65mm, FN-Browning Model 1910's were issued to CF generals from 1970. No. 7 Lee-Enfield .22's were used for eons as training rifles. As well as High Standard pistols, the Regm't never used. And there was a sub-calibre device made for the C1A1 rifle, the Regm't never used either. More trouble to borrow 'em than it was worth.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
November 14, 2017, 06:32 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
I would point out that, among the equipment displayed by the Soviets after shooting down Frances Gary Powers' U2 spyplane was a suppressed High Standard .22LR and four boxes of ammo.
.22LR target rifles and pistols were available to use at many military posts recreational ranges, up through at least the 1970s when I served. Frontline combat? not so much. Training & some more ..covert applications, yes, we did use the .22LR. I don't know if we still do, or if so, to what degree, though.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
November 14, 2017, 06:41 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2000
Posts: 1,082
|
I would love to see a photo/link for these U.S. General Officer .380s.
|
November 14, 2017, 07:07 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,289
|
If you trust Wikipedia you can find info, including a picture, here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_M...ket_Hammerless Here's some text from the article. Quote:
|
|
November 14, 2017, 07:20 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2017
Posts: 323
|
That internally suppressed Ruger Mark II is really cool.
|
November 14, 2017, 07:33 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,968
|
"I would love to see a photo/link for these U.S. General Officer .380s."
http://www.coltautos.com/usgopistols/index.html That link has tons of pictures of specific pistols issued to specific generals along with pictures of the holsters. belts, belt buckles..... and all that.
__________________
You know the rest. In the books you have read How the British Regulars fired and fled, How the farmers gave them ball for ball, From behind each fence and farmyard wall, Chasing the redcoats down the lane, Then crossing the fields to emerge again Under the trees at the turn of the road, And only pausing to fire and load. Last edited by 444; November 14, 2017 at 07:41 PM. |
November 14, 2017, 08:50 PM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
The Russians used or used a suppressed modified Olympic 5.6mm rifle in the second Chechen war.
The reason? During the first Chechen war, they suffered casualties and were in general greatly hampered by Chechen snipers armed with similar rimfire weapons. The Russians have a pension for adopting weapons found effect against there own forces. |
November 14, 2017, 11:06 PM | #19 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
AFAIK, the Colt 22/45 conversion units were strictly for use in training where ranges suitable for .45 were not available or .45 practice was thought too expensive. I have never heard of any being used in combat.
IIRC a H-S .22 was issued to Powers, of U2 fame, for survival hunting in case he was forced down, the same reason bomber crews were sometimes issued "survival rifles". While, obviously, such a "survival" guns could be used against an enemy, it was never intended to be an effective anti-personnel weapon. The airman's weapon was really the plane itself and its weapons, not a pilot's personal pistol. Jim |
November 15, 2017, 12:37 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2012
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 125
|
In Viet Nam in the 1960`s & 1970`s in 111 Corps you would see a Suppressed High Standard 22LR every once in awhile. They were usually carried by one of the Spooks. And the ones I got to shoot were really quiet and extremely accurate. I never seen one but I have heard Marines from up north talk about seeing Suppressed Ruger 22LR in I Corp, again carried mostly by Spooks.
ken
__________________
THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS NOT FREE: |
November 15, 2017, 02:26 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
We used a .22 caliber air rifle for rat decimation in Iraq. It wasn't very accurate and a range of over 100' would not often kill the rat when it hit. I wish I could recall the make/ model. It was ordered through the supply system.
We did not live on a FOB or a COP.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
November 15, 2017, 10:14 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
IIRC .380/9x17 pistols were used by a number of small European militaries prior to WWII (e.g. FN Browning 1922), and when such countries were overrun by the Nazis, some of these pistols were adopted as substitute standards complete with Waffenamt markings and designations.
Additionally, IIRC the .380 Beretta Model 1934 was the standard sidearm of Italian army officers during WWII. Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
November 15, 2017, 12:12 PM | #23 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,675
|
I have a Mauser HSc in .32acp (7,65mm Browning) with the WaA pruf stamp.
Nazi marked, all steel gun, compared to new design .32s, its a brick! (heavy) This is, however a comfort to me, because it simply feels ...solid. And I want a ..solid.. feeling gun, in .32acp, so that after I have expended all the rounds, I have something with some weight in my hand to hit my attacker with... The Nazi administration was always critically short of pistols. The main reason was that nearly every uniform included a pistol (and a dress dagger for really formal wear) and nearly every job wore a uniform, not just the military, but political party people, and civil servants as well. Service class (9mm) capture guns (which includes those made under occupation) nearly always went to the military, and especially the Waffen SS in the early war years, Smaller caliber guns most often (but not always) went to political administrators, and civil service workers, and Nazi Germany had a lot of those, from the postman to the dog catcher to the guy who sold the tickets at the train station.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
November 15, 2017, 03:36 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 8, 2015
Posts: 908
|
44AMP...I gathered a lot of history on the matter and Nazi officers and officials, not necessarily in combat, seemed to prefer the smallest sidearm they could get....25 ACP and .32s, as kind of a badge of rank.
Of course, when the general population has been disarmed, even the smallest caliber handgun is not a major handicap |
November 15, 2017, 08:37 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
|
"Additionally, IIRC the .380 Beretta Model 1934 was the standard sidearm of Italian army officers during WWII."
Yep, and I have an Israeli military surplus Beretta in 380acp. I also own a Mauser 32acp with WWI military acceptance markings. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|