The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 25, 2019, 08:36 PM   #76
Sharkbite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,678
Quote:
It's easy to see the difference just by shooting at a pylon of steel flipper targets.
That one of the reasons the 45acp was deemed a “better” defensive round. It moved bowling pins and steel plates BETTER then lighter bullets. The problem is that people are not made out of steel.
Sharkbite is offline  
Old March 25, 2019, 09:09 PM   #77
Ruger45LC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
The .40 isn't going anywhere, maybe it has lost some popularity but overall, if an agency switches from .40 to 9mm it isn't because the 9mm is better or as good, it's about money, pure and simple. Many agencies do still use the .40, so it's not dying by any means. Someone else here mentioned it and I've never really thought about it much, but it's true, the .45 ACP has been pretty stale for a long time. I can't think of too many, if any, hot new .45 ACPs on the market, it usually requires a larger gun. It just so happens to be that 9mm is very popular right now, and that's due to many factors (largely the interest in small handguns) and I'm not saying it's a bad cartridge, but it's not a .40 or a .45.

Personally I love the .40, I can't really find fault with it. I get a 9mm sized frame and 9mm like capacity with the ability to punch bigger holes. It's got a lot of unrealized potential as well that many aren't even aware of.
Ruger45LC is offline  
Old March 26, 2019, 09:56 AM   #78
FLJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 219
Quote:
Lohmann446 wrote:
Functional equivalence. Dropping the word functional from "no functional difference" makes a tremendously different argument than the one I asserted and creates a straw man - an argument that was never actually made.
I dropped nothing. I quoted your assertion verbatim. And I disagree with your assertion that there is "no functional difference."

We won't come to an agreement on this point, so there's little point in pursuing it. I only wanted to point out I was not misrepresenting your argument.
FLJim is offline  
Old March 26, 2019, 11:17 PM   #79
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lohman446
The functional difference between a 9MM and .40 is virtually none.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLJim
But to claim the difference between the two is "virtually none" is a provably false assertion.
I believe that this is what Lohman446 is referring to.

He stated that the "functional difference" between the two "is virtually none". Your restatement of his claim was: "the difference between the two is virtually none".
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 01:05 AM   #80
silvermane_1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 897
Hence came along the 45 Super there Sharkbite.
__________________
Rugers:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlins: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE
9mm 4",Springfield:XD .357sig 4", AKs:CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63, WW74,SLR-106c
silvermane_1 is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 05:01 AM   #81
Brit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
Never owned a .40 S&W anything. When I was a Board Member of IALEFI, I was the first to bring a 9mm into the group. "If you cannot do it with 6?" crowd, spoke out. I even coined a phrase. "More is better, always" In 1984, my Glock 17 was an oddity.

With the many different bullet types, weights, velocities in the defensive calibres, any of them work. Placement is king, 9mm is cheapest. Nuff said.
Brit is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 09:39 AM   #82
FLJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnKSa View Post
I believe that this is what Lohman446 is referring to.

He stated that the "functional difference" between the two "is virtually none". Your restatement of his claim was: "the difference between the two is virtually none".
Ah. Got it. I meant "difference" in the same vein as he. I guess it was a mistake to leave out the word "functional."

So let me clarify: I disagree with his assertion there is virtually no functional difference between the 9mm and .40 S&W.
FLJim is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 09:40 AM   #83
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Quote:
I disagree with his assertion there is virtually no functional difference between the 9mm and .40 S&W.
I disagree with your disagreement.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 09:51 AM   #84
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
Ah. Got it. I meant "difference" in the same vein as he. I guess it was a mistake to leave out the word "functional."

So let me clarify: I disagree with his assertion there is virtually no functional difference between the 9mm and .40 S&W.
That we can disagree on. And yes JohnKSa was right in my objection to the original wording of the disagreement. Thank you. Because I am worried about a functional difference we really should define what function we are discussing as well. For me its as a defensive firearm. If the function you intend to discuss is mathematical than the physics become central to it.

With that portion said, and considering functional as a defensive firearm, what situation do you intend to assert where a .40 would be functionally different than a 9MM (assuming both using high quality ammunition)?

Remember also that my assertion that there was virtually no functional difference between a .40 and a 9MM was a premise in an argument that the .40 would never die. Being functional similar to the long standing most popular handgun cartridge in the world does not seem like it would be a negative thing .
__________________
A coward believes he will ever live if he keep him safe from strife: but old age leaves him not long in peace
though spears may spare his life. - The Havamal (Bray translation)
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 01:40 PM   #85
pblanc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 697
Given two projectiles a different diameter, or different expanded diameter, assuming all else is equal (entry wound position, projectile path, depth of penetration) the wounding potential of the larger projectile will be greater in cases in which the smaller projectile just barely missed a critical structure.

How often will this happen? Probably quite few to very few instances, but if you think it never happens you are wrong. I have seen gunshot wounds in the operating room in which the projectile just barely missed a major pulmonary artery, or the descending aorta, in which the wall of the vessel was nicked but the lumen was not penetrated. In such instances, the wound from a projectile of slightly greater diameter would have produced a dramatically different outcome.

Projectile momentum also comes into play. Larger projectiles typically have greater momentum than smaller ones. Projectiles with greater momentum are more likely to continue on course without deviating when they encounter interfaces of greater density, especially when the encounter those interfaces at an angle. Human tissue consists of structures of vastly different density and are also highly anisotropic, completely unlike ballistic gelatin. So the advantage of greater projectile momentum is virtually never brought out in ballistic gelatin tests/

Last edited by pblanc; March 27, 2019 at 01:46 PM.
pblanc is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 01:49 PM   #86
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
assuming all else is equal
While your statement holds truth to it there is a significant caveat in the above. Controlling for all confounding variables is done through the above in discussion or in careful experimental design because, as you know, it simply doesn't happen in the real world. It is unlikely that two projectiles of different diameter actually do follow the exact same path due to forces that work against them differently due to that difference.

Its an easy, and accurate, premise as long as your caveat holds but I don't think its actually that simple when we are discussing what happens in the case of the "real" world (I can't come up with a better term and that is not meant to be derisive).

In the end the .40 is NOT dying anytime in my generation or that of my children. If you believe it is a better round for you, for whatever reason, you are welcome to it. I still think your grasping at straws to differentiate it from a 9MM (or a 9MM from it) but its really not any harm done for you to carry whatever you want.

Last edited by Lohman446; March 27, 2019 at 01:57 PM.
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 27, 2019, 09:08 PM   #87
rc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,742
I shoot 9mm more than 40 due to cost of ammo. That's the main reason 9mm beats 40 in places like California where 10 rounds for civilians is the law. In addition, the 40 is a bit harsh on small autos that are becoming more popular for CCW where the 9mm does a great job. I bought a K9 rather than a K40 for CCW because it's more controllable and easier on the gun. In a full size gun 40 has an edge over 9 using comparable ammo and is greatly superior to 9 in many cases nearing 357 magnum in effectiveness. Gun sales are in a slump with Trump but the sky is not falling and we will continue to see 40 caliber autos roll off the assembly line. I'm sure 9 out sells most other pistol calibers.
rc is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 09:24 AM   #88
FLJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lohman446 View Post
With that portion said, and considering functional as a defensive firearm, what situation do you intend to assert where a .40 would be functionally different than a 9MM (assuming both using high quality ammunition)?
My argument is essentially addressed by pblanc, with your caveats noted and conceded.
FLJim is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 03:20 PM   #89
abarhorst
Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2009
Posts: 21
40 dying

It's more the 9mm growing due to the price of ammo. At ~ $.05 a shot difference many chose to save.
abarhorst is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 06:26 PM   #90
Quick1
Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2014
Posts: 53
I am sure it will never completely die, but it is dead with me. I converted my Glock 23 to a 9mm and sold off my remaining .40 ammo. Happy with my decision and never looking back.
Quick1 is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 06:45 PM   #91
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by abarhorst View Post
It's more the 9mm growing due to the price of ammo. At ~ $.05 a shot difference many chose to save.
The cost difference is less than it was years ago (noticeably IMO) and yet 40SW had more market share back then. I don't think you can credit the current situation solely to economics.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
TunnelRat is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 07:39 PM   #92
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 1,850
TunnelRat I think you can credit the current situation to perception. Many perceive (rightly so IMO)that 9 mm offers nearly identical wound characteristics for less money, more capacity, smaller platforms and faster shots on target. Of course I could be wrong, your mileage may vary, etc.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin
K_Mac is offline  
Old March 28, 2019, 11:29 PM   #93
SATRP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2019
Posts: 108
LE agencies might issue a handgun chambered for a specific cartridge; however, LE agencies generally allow their cops to carry approved handguns and cartridges.

I've read the FBI is going with the 9MM, but we don't know handgun and cartridges its cops will carry.

The .40 S&W is here to stay. It's efficacy has been demonstrated.
SATRP is offline  
Old March 29, 2019, 08:23 PM   #94
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,930
A new generation of LE firearms trainers - and shooters - are finding it easier and faster to create practical and competent skillsets using 9mm than .40, .45 or .357SIG.

It doesn't hurt that the recoil forces developed by the 9mm is often considered easier on guns (maintenance-wise) than the heavier recoiling calibers, too (according to gun makers who teach armorer classes for LE).

Nor does it hurt that the folks who prefer slightly higher magazine capacity can realize a slight gain when changing from .40 to 9mm.

Depending on how LE/Gov ammunition contracts or individual agency purchases may be done, it's not uncommon for 9mm to cost a bit less than .40 or .45, too.

This is just one of those "swings" of caliber preference that occurs now and again in LE/Gov circles.

No biggie. Caliber diversification for the private owner and shooting enthusiast can help make it easier to find ammo when one or another caliber may become less easily found, too.
__________________
Retired LE - firearms instructor & armorer
fastbolt is offline  
Old March 29, 2019, 10:27 PM   #95
Omaha-BeenGlockin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,183
Just put a M&P 40 on lay-a-way----basically to convert to .357 Sig---didn't hurt that a local dealer had them priced to sell.
__________________
I take the leech that's bleeding me
Can't stop to save my soul
I take the leash that's leading me
-------Metallica
Omaha-BeenGlockin is offline  
Old March 30, 2019, 04:09 AM   #96
Brit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
Personly, my thoughts on 40 Vs 9mm, it is the ability to get back on the sights!
So more hits, quicker, all things being equal, so to speak.

Having the same gun, in the same place, always, is a bonus.
Brit is offline  
Old March 30, 2019, 10:10 AM   #97
Ruger45LC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
I understand the logic behind faster follow up shots, but most of this is done at the range using basic 115gr or 124gr FMJ, then usually when people carry a JHP for defense, which is what we train for, it's mostly a +P or +P+ variant which kinda brings the faster follow up shots argument into question. The two don't have the same recoil characteristic.

At least with the .40, the recoil signature of what you practice with is going to be identical to what you carry, not so much with 9mm unless you carry standard pressure 115gr or 124gr, which not many do (exception being the 147gr). Everyone is different, but I could only tell a slight difference between shooting a G19 and G23 side by side (115/124gr vs. 180gr), so slight that there's no way the added recoil of the .40 would hinder my shot placement or drive me to accept a smaller caliber, lower powered 9mm. I've legitimately tried to switch from .40 to 9mm on three occasions and I can't do it. The .40 has much more potential in it than the 9mm does.


Last edited by Ruger45LC; March 30, 2019 at 10:16 AM.
Ruger45LC is offline  
Old March 30, 2019, 09:05 PM   #98
Lohman446
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
Quote:
The .40 has much more potential in it than the 9mm does
So why not 10MM, 357 Sig, 40 Super, 45 Super, 45 or the myriad of choices with far more potential than the .40? Before we get too excited about capacity arguments note the 357 Sig on the list
__________________
A coward believes he will ever live if he keep him safe from strife: but old age leaves him not long in peace
though spears may spare his life. - The Havamal (Bray translation)
Lohman446 is offline  
Old March 31, 2019, 03:28 AM   #99
Brit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
This argument has been around for years. Basically to each his own.
My longtime favourite carry pistol, the Gen 4 Glock 19, just seems to be the perfect weapon, to carry concealed. 16 rounds of controllable 147g Ranger T.
Ready to go. In a medium weight pistol.

After years of this carry, just bought a blue box Glock 43X. Love it, not even fired it yet. I have two holsters for it, a Bravo Kydex pancake, and a Safariland lock type, off and on a type that slips into the pants. Not keen on either.

Feels great in the quick pointing Dept. Expecting Glock to come out any time soon with my favourite carry holster, the $13.00 belt slide for the 43 series?
Suitably chopped up, for my G19, and now for my 43X? Not so much.
The night sights are the ones fitted at the factory? Have a big red circle around the front green Trigiden front sight. Real quick to spot. Glock have a mag pouch for the 43 series.
My first new pistol in years, love it. 11 and not 16? Jury is out on that question.

Last edited by Brit; April 2, 2019 at 01:36 AM.
Brit is offline  
Old March 31, 2019, 09:51 AM   #100
JDBerg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthTellers:
I don't see .45 ACP sticking around. It costs significantly more than .40 and 9mm, it's less powerful than 10mm, it's the lowest capacity. The largest reason 9mm is favored over .40 is the price, the lower recoil is secondary as most who own a 9mm immediately go for +P as their defense ammo.
As long as the most of the gun manufacturers keep cranking out new 1911 models, I definitely do see .45 ACP caliber handguns and ammo sticking around. I don’t know where you buy your ammo but .40 S&W & .45 ACP factory ammo in my experience is close enough in price so that I can shoot my .45 ACP caliber guns while my lone remaining .40S&W a Sig P226 doesn’t get much range time these days.

For me, it hasn’t been a 9mm vs. .40 S&W debate, it’s been a .40 S&W vs. .45 ACP debate, and in that case, I’m choosing .45 ACP just about every time. I like my 1911’s, always have & always will. My Gen4 Glock 21 replaced a Gen4 Glock 22, no regrets there. My HK45 replaced an HK USP40, although I wouldn’t mind getting another USP40 / Compact if I come across a nice one. As far as getting other .40 S&W caliber handguns, I can see me with a Beretta 96FS at some point.

And if Glock releases the Gen 5 22/23/27 then that tells me that the .40 S&W has a good future. You may or may not like their product but Glock is a bellweather for the firearms industry and their market research is top notch.
__________________
Words to Live By: Before You Pray - Believe; Before You Speak - Listen; Before You Spend - Earn; Before You Write - Think; Before You Quit - Try; Before You Die - Live
JDBerg is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10870 seconds with 8 queries