The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 15, 2009, 10:05 PM   #1
Dr. Strangelove
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,436
8mm Rem Mag

So, the brother has purchased one of these cannons and has dies and brass on the way. I've got some 150gr and 170gr 8mm projectiles left over from my old 8mm Mauser days and I'm planning on using them up in this devil. Target shooting only for the moment. I'm thinking of using the RL-22 I use in my 7mm Rem Mag for this endeavor.

Anyone have any specific experience loading for this beast? I'm open to suggestion, as there isn't much data available.
Dr. Strangelove is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 01:49 AM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
I used to own a Rem 700 in 8mm Rem Mag. It was scary accurate, and shot flat, but it was rough on the shooter. I always describe shooting it as being like slammming your head in a car door. Recoil and muzzleblast are overwhelming. I loaded the 220 gr Hornady SP over just shy of 80 gr of H450, turning out 3,000 fps out of a 26" barrel. H450 is very similar to Reloader 19, FYI, so Reloader 22 should work well. Just a tip: the 8mm bullets typically sound in reloading shops are designed for 8mm Mauser velocities and do not do well when pushed 30% faster. I would try some Barnes X bullets or the new Winchester XP3 bullets.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 07:33 AM   #3
Magnum Wheel Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
I always wanted one but could never justify buying one, as it was too close to the 338 Win Mag I already have... SCORCH... did you find it more punishing than a 338 would have been out of the same gun ???

DR... the on line load site I subscribe to seems to have a couple different loads... I'll look at the powder options...
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust...
Magnum Wheel Man is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 07:49 AM   #4
Magnum Wheel Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
That site has load data for ...

150 gr bullet
H-4350
AA 4350
IMR 4350
IMR 4831
N-560
WMR

170 gr bullet
N-165
RL-19
H 4350
IMR 4350
AA 4350
H-450
IMR 4831

these were just under one reference

I subscribe to the site, because of the vast amount of load data there... check it out

http://www.loaddata.com/members/list...m&caliberid=57
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust...
Magnum Wheel Man is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 10:52 AM   #5
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
You may find that those bullets simply aren't up to the velocities that the 8mm Mag. generates.

The 8mm Mag. was a decent cartridge, but like a lot of other Remington cartridges, they really screwed up the introduction by brining it out YEARS too late (after the .338 was really well established) and then they screwed up the bullet selections.

Bullets that would have made the round really effective Remington simply didn't offer.

There's a story that at the writer's conference where Remington introduced the 8mm, Elmer Keith listened intently, then got to his feet and brought the house down with one question -- "What the hell good is it?"

Apparently he didn't think too much of the round.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 11:20 AM   #6
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,424
Ken Waters

In Pet Loads, he called the recoil very fast and sharp in the M700. Looking at the data, it takes a lot more powder to duplicate the 338WM with 200s. In fact, my 338-06 is only 100fps behind with 56gr of powder.........
GeauxTide is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 12:14 PM   #7
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
SCORCH... did you find it more punishing than a 338 would have been out of the same gun ?
Yes and no. Recoil is about the same, possibly a bit more. It launches a lighter bullet slightly faster than a 338, so the recoil is faster and sharper, as opposed to the 338 hard steady shove. It burns about 5-10% more powder than a 338, so it definitely speaks up when it has something to say, if you get my drift. Muzzle blast and concussion are powerful.

I shoot my friend's 338 in a light shirt. I would never shoot a 8mm Rem Mag in a light shirt.

I really think Remington would have done better with this cartridge if better bullets and slower powders had been available in the late 70s-early 80s. I loaded H450, about the slowest I could find. I think a powder like Retumbo or H50BMG or H1000 would be a good bet with the heaviest bullets available. But it is essentially a 8X68 with a belt. Maybe Remington learned something, they introduced the Ultra Mag line a few years later with no belt.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 12:35 PM   #8
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
I'm pretty sure that IMR 7828 was available back then, and did a fine job in this and other large bore cartridges.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old September 16, 2009, 01:28 PM   #9
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that IMR 7828 was available back then, and did a fine job in this and other large bore cartridges.
That could be, Mike, but I don't remember ever seeing IMR7828 until the mid to late 1990s. Even if it was available, I didn't have load data available. About the slowest powers I remember being available were H450, IMR4831, Norma MRP.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old September 19, 2009, 09:22 PM   #10
Dr. Strangelove
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,436
Range report

Thanks for all the replies!

I ended up going with RL-22 after speaking with Alliant powder, Speer, and Hornady. The rifle is a Remington 700 BDL.

Recoil and muzzle blast were impressive with the 150gr and 170gr starting loads, but not a huge increase over my 7mm Rem Mag. Definitely let you know you were shooting something, but not overly uncomfortable. We had bore-sighted the scope and finished sighting-in at 100 yds, it seems accurate enough given that we were just out to shoot and not trying for great accuracy.

We found an old box of factory 220gr loads on the clearance table at a local gunshop for $5.00 and decided to try them as well. These were approaching being uncomfortable, recoil being more like a hard punch to the shoulder, sort of like when you fooled around in the hallways in High School.

All around good fun and it seems like it will be a good addition to the stable. The magazine floorplate flew open after every shot, so I'll be looking for a new latch I suppose. (Boo hinged floorplates)

Last edited by Dr. Strangelove; September 19, 2009 at 10:24 PM.
Dr. Strangelove is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 07:16 PM   #11
thekyrifleman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2007
Location: Northern Ky
Posts: 254
A little late here but I have been shooting the "big 8" for about 20 years. I first tried the 150 gr sierras because I have an 8mm mauser. 90 gr of RL 22 in Rem cases, Fed 215 promers gave me 3375fps 10 ft from the muzzle and the groups were about 3/4". Killed a whitetail at a lazered 427 yds and she hit the dirt immediately. Also have shot the Barnes, Nosler partitions, all using RL 22. That seems to work the best. Since RL 25 has become available that might be one to try also.
thekyrifleman is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 11:38 PM   #12
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
My 338WM does not kick noticeably with 250 gr bullets and 69 gr H4350 2640 fps.
It is 3.34" OAL.

The 8mmRM is 3.6" over all length, and will not fit in any of my actions.
I would love to build one, if I had an action that was long enough.

I think there are Rem700 factory 8mmRM rifles that occasionally come up for sale.
Clark is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 10:46 AM   #13
roy reali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
Baby Time

Many years ago I had a Remington 700 chambered for the 8mm Remington magnum. All the recoil stories here are true. In fact, it helped induce labor.

My wife at the time was pregnant. She was one month past due. We were becoming a little inpatient. I took her to the range, she sat at a bench and proceeded to shoot the 8 mag. She fired half a dozen shots. The next day she went into labor and our daughter was born. It is hard to say weahter the recoil from the rifle got things started, but who knowns?
roy reali is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 03:29 PM   #14
thekyrifleman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2007
Location: Northern Ky
Posts: 254
Good work Roy!!!!! and my first wife gave me grief because I took her for a pickup truck ride over bumpy roads!!!!! Also next day delivery!!
thekyrifleman is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05225 seconds with 10 queries