|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 7, 2017, 11:52 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
After jurors criticize guns, man accused of gun crime wants judge to decide case
Is this where America is heading?
This is what your up against if you ever have to defend yourself in Portland. Read the responses from the jury pool..... Basically, not one juror believed it is appropriate to use a gun to defend your life even if your life is at stake... http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/i...art_river_home (minor spelling edit)
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 Last edited by Koda94; February 8, 2017 at 01:04 AM. |
February 8, 2017, 01:01 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,986
|
The sad thing is that he may have the same problem with the judge. Even judges now feel it's ok to rule based on how they feel instead of on what the law says.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
February 8, 2017, 01:35 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
The guy took a gun to a Black Lives Matter march. Plenty of white people there, but he's the only one who feels threatened by the mob. There are lots of pictures, video, and eyewitnesses. One of the eyewitnesses is a cop. He probably had a better chance with a jury. |
|
February 8, 2017, 02:03 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
Quote:
out of 30 potential jurors 10 right away said its not smart to carry a gun in public, 9 claimed to be "generally opposed to firearms" , 2 hunters who own guns expressed bias against carrying a gun for self defense, a "few" more claimed they were against using a gun to defend themselves in their home and one person claimed he was once attacked and robbed by 5 bad guys and chose not to fight back and be a pacifist. (paraphrased) somewhere in there I lost count, Id say 25 easy... cant have a fair trial when your jurors are already decided against ya.
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
|
February 8, 2017, 02:06 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Heres one part of the article: "One woman said even if someone tried to rob her at an ATM, she wouldn't pull out a gun in response because it would only escalate the situation." Notice she never says it's not appropriate to use a gun if your life is at stake. Maybe that's what she believes, but this quote doesn't convey that. Her quote is conveying the idea that it's better to not resist and just go along with the robber and hope nobody gets hurt, instead of escalating the situation into a potential deadly situation by pulling out a gun. Apparently she believes your life is more at risk if you pull out a gun than if you just go along with the robber. Here's another part of the article: "'I have pretty strong feelings about the type of person who would want to carry a gun around for personal protection,' said one hunter." Notice he doesn't say anything specifically against the act of using a gun to save your life, he's more just prejudiced against the type of people he thinks are the ones who carry guns. Here's another quote: "Jason Short, another defense attorney, asked if any of the potential jurors were opposed to using a gun to defend themselves at home or if strangers approached them at an ATM. A few jurors raised their hands. 'I'm just afraid that someone would be killed, and it wouldn't have happened if the firearm wasn't there,' said a woman. 'I'm just very uncomfortable with a gun coming out.' Again, this quote isn't saying that the person is against the idea of protecting one's life necessarily, it's simply saying that this person believes that the presence of a gun can escalate a situation where nobody was going to get hurt into one where someone does get hurt. Obviously, I disagree strongly with this statement, but these people apparently believe that they're safer if they just go along with someone who is trying to rob them instead of trying to fight back with a gun. Now, I'm not saying I agree with any of these sentiments at all, but we shouldn't misquote and misrepresent articles like these. Nowhere in the article is anyone specifically asked if they are for or against using a gun to protect one's life, and nowhere in this article does anyone explicitly answer these questions. What I get from these responses is less of a resistance to the idea of self-defense, and more of an embrace of the idea that guns always make a situation worse. Again, this doesn't mean I agree with any of the jurors quoted in this article. I don't. But let's not misunderstand the opinions of anti-gun folks. If we can truly understand what they're trying to say, it's easier to actually refute their anti-gun positions.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
February 8, 2017, 02:07 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
I corrected my misstatement in post 4
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
February 8, 2017, 02:11 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
February 8, 2017, 02:31 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
I saw that and understand.
I still dont think he can get a fair trial but I dont understand the process well enough to see otherwise. I also wanted to show how bad the anti-gun sentiment has become, I dont think its confined to just Portland either. Those juror comments were telling and the fact nearly most all of them feel that way shows how they put their bias first... Not one consideration to the fact that he was retrieting to get away.
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
February 8, 2017, 02:34 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
Quote:
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
|
February 8, 2017, 02:57 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 641
|
Lots of people took video.
|
February 8, 2017, 08:47 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
|
|
February 8, 2017, 11:47 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
Quote:
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
|
February 8, 2017, 12:17 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
Discretion is the better part of valor. I think that would apply in his case. I will say, somewhat to his defense, that the mere presence of several individuals wearing bandanas on their face focusing on me would unnerve me a little. Not so much to his defense, I don't think I would get in a shouting match with them. |
|
February 8, 2017, 12:22 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Koda, So you have a link to some of the video evidence showing him being attacked by the mob?
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
February 8, 2017, 12:24 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
I am no longer at home so I cant paste links, easy Google if you search his name...
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
February 8, 2017, 12:35 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
A google search is how I found the video. The one that doesn't depict him being attacked at all.
|
February 8, 2017, 12:45 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
I've watched the video of the incident, and I saw no evidence that the crowd "attacked" Mr. Strickland. Before he pulled the gun, the video shows the crowd walking in his direction; he seems to have been in front of the marchers as they were moving in the direction they had planned to march. No one laid hands on him or threatened him with a "flag staff." After he puts the gun away, there are people calming the crowd, and there are people attempting to persuade Mr. Strickland to leave. He clearly was there to film the march (and was well known to many of the marchers), and no one was preventing him from leaving if he felt threatened; that pretty well undermines any claim to self-defense he may try to make. He seems to be something of a professional provocateur, which doesn't particularly help his case.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
February 8, 2017, 01:03 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Posts: 975
|
I saw some of the video. I'd be interested to see if there is any footage starting about a minute earlier and an angle of him from behind.
Last edited by ATN082268; February 8, 2017 at 01:16 PM. |
February 8, 2017, 02:07 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
|
|
February 8, 2017, 02:17 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,294
|
The video I saw showed the guy walking backwars trying to leave, the mob following him and closing in around him just before he drew. IIRC at least one guy was trying to flank him. The fact he was walking backwards tells me he felt threatened. Whos to say any of the protesters wasnt armed? Whos to say what made him feel so threatened he didnt want to turn his back to them to run?
All I know is I see a guy trying to leave the scene peacefully, and now his freedom is on the line for defending himself. He never even fired a shot or even had to put his finger on the trigger. As soon as the mob backed off he reholstered his gun. Doesnt sound like the kind of guy that was starting a fight.
__________________
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2 |
February 8, 2017, 02:31 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
EDIT: I was thinking about another case.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...an-shot-5-blm- protesters-records-article-1.2954960 Last edited by zincwarrior; February 8, 2017 at 02:39 PM. |
February 8, 2017, 05:23 PM | #22 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
These are the statements made by members of the jury "pool" not jurors.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But we're talking about members of a pool of potential jurors and if you run out of members of the pool you just get more. |
||||
February 8, 2017, 05:36 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
I think it's important that we, in our zeal to defend the second amendment, do not defend someone who improperly (quite possibly criminally) displays a firearm and points it at people who pose no real threat out of knee-jerk reaction. Pointing a gun at someone without a legal exception (i.e. self defense) is a crime. At any rate, I am glad you posted the original article that reported the comments of the jury. These comments (which I am a little taken aback by some of them), and the need for anyone charged to have a fair trail, warrant discussion. I believe this gentleman deserves his day in court, but he also deserves a fair trail. I don't know that this should rise to the level of being a felony... but I guess if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes. |
|
February 9, 2017, 12:14 AM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,467
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9, 2017, 08:26 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|