|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 2, 2005, 09:21 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Posts: 16
|
Smokeless powder in a muzzleloader?
Hi everyone,
This is gonna sound pretty stupid. But then, maybe it'll prevent someone from making a huge mistake later on. In this site, http://www.barnesbullets.com/faq_expander_mz.php , I found the following excerpt. Will the MZ work in my smokeless muzzleloader? Barnes tested the Savage 110 ML-II smokeless muzzleloader using Barnes 250gr MZ bullets, with excellent results. Savage recommends fast-burning powders such as XMP 5744, IMR 4227, &VV N110, all of which develop considerably higher pressures than will black powder or Pyrodex. Although the Savage rifle can safely handle the higher pressures, most of the sabots we tested cannot. Excessive pressures cause the sabot to fail, which results in inconsistent velocities, poor accuracy, and even bullet tumbling. Barnes tested several slower-burning powders such as H4198, and RL-7. These two powders gave pressures similar to black powder and Pyrodex, accuracy was sub-MOA, and velocity was excellent. Barnes has not yet conducted sufficient testing to publish starting and maximum loads for these powders, however about 65 grs of either powder appears equivalent to 150 grs of Pyrodex pellets. What caught my eye particularly was the equivalence the author was concluding in regard to the pressures of the slower burning powders as compared to pyrodex. It would seem that about 65 grains of H4198 would produce equivalent pressures as pyrodex at 150 grains. And to someone inexperienced with muzzleloaders it might be twisted to mean that the 65 grains of H4198 is safe in his muzzleloader rated for 150 grains of pyrodex pellets. I can find fault particularly in that, in my firearm at least, the bullet might seat below the rifle lands using so little volume of powder. Also, it seems to me, that in seating the bullet, either compaction or crushing of the smokeless powder would affect its burn rate and also pressures. any comments? |
November 3, 2005, 03:19 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2005
Location: West Texas
Posts: 376
|
Sounds like a plague to be avoided to me.
|
November 6, 2005, 01:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2004
Location: Remote Utah desert
Posts: 224
|
A pox on Savage and anyone responsible for creating the abominable muzzleloader that fires smokeless powder.
May their trigger finger get a cancer, among other parts of their body! The rifle has not been a resounding success, owing to problems with accuracy. I'm sure many idiots have dumped smokeless powder, either full amounts or as "priming" charges, into their black-powder-only firearms, only to strain or ruin the gun. Savage's 110 is designed to attract only those hunters who must cheat during muzzleloading season. The black powder season was, universally, introduced so the shooters of primitive firearms did not have to compete against modern firearms. Inlines and other abominations were designed solely to cheat. I wish that all inlines and modern devices such as scopes, laser sights and glow-in-dark sights were banned from black powder season. And I hope Savage stops making the 110. It's an insult.
__________________
"And lo, did I see an ugly cat. Smoke. Brimstone. Holes in parchment. And this ugly cat was much amused." --- The Prophesies of Gatodamus (1503 - 1566) |
December 21, 2005, 06:57 PM | #4 | ||||
Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
It is obvious that you and your buddy 20cows, have absolutely none, notta, zero, knowledge of the Savage 10ML-II, it's conception, it's design, it's capabilties, and it's limitations. Quote:
Quote:
Back when many of these muzzleloader seasons were first established, deer populations were relatively low, and the number up people who took up muzzleloaders to take advantage of this additional season, were relatively few as well. However, many things have changed over the 30-40 years since may of these season were established, such as deer populations across the country have exploded and the number of people who take advantage of this additional season has grown dramatically as well. The vast majority of these new muzzleloader hunters simply want the the most performance and the most user friendly muzzleloader they can get, to cleanly harvest their intended game in the quickiest and most human manner possible. They could care less about dressing up in buckskins and toting their great-grandfathers flintlock around the woods. Things have changed in the states DNR offices as well. They are trying to control expanding deer populations and in the face of revenue shortages see the $$$ from these additional muzzleloader seasons as a way to generate sorely needed additional funds. They have to balance their duties and responsibilities, between the needs of the herd and the wants and wishes the hunters. Obviously, they cannot please everyone, as in your case. I totally support you in your endevours to hunt with any type of muzzleloader you desire. I will not, however, tolerate you forcing your wishes or personal preferrences upon me. To make such a statement as Quote:
Injun, If you truely want more and more importantly accurate imformation, not myths, misconceptions, and lies, try this link. Tons of good straight information on the Savage 10ML-II, as well as other in-lines. http://modernmuzzleloader.com/phpBB/index.php |
||||
December 21, 2005, 07:43 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2005
Location: The Republic of Californi
Posts: 581
|
Lit his tail on fire didn't ya..........
Musta hit a nerve Gatofeo. Huh?
|
December 21, 2005, 08:25 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Fairbanksan in exile to Aleutian Hell
Posts: 2,655
|
Really a non-issue similar to the pointless arguement of crossbow/traditional/compound users in the archery community.
Use what you want as long as it isn't illegal. Your equipment choice dosen't affect me or my life. Perhaps more people should be a little more tolorant of others choices. I shoot a .54 GPR w/ patched round ball, but I think the Savage ML-110 would make a great SHTF survival rifle.
__________________
Stop Allowing Our Schools To Be Soft Targets! http://fastersaveslives.org/ East Moose. Wear Wolf. |
December 21, 2005, 10:16 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
Stevelyn, I concur. Regardless of whether it's a flintlock, sidelock, or any in-line, inlcuding the Savage 10ML-II, they ALL have one thing in common. That is they ALL load from the muzzle. The style and type of ignition is totally ones personal choice. The propellent used is specified by the manufacture, and regulated and enforced by individual states DNR. If it is legal, I have no problems with what ever trips ones trigger. I have no problems at all, sharing the woods and fields with flinters, sidelocks, or in-lines. There is room for them all. |
|
|
|