The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 7, 2016, 12:53 PM   #1
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
magnum small pistol primer ?

Normally I load 357 mag cases with 2.7 of bullseye and a 148 gr hbwc with a small pistol primer. Now I have a bunch of 357 mag cases already primed with small magnum pistol primers, what would the effect be on my standard load with the magnum primer instead of a standard primer ? Would it change the load much or will it be safe ?
rebs is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 01:06 PM   #2
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
Not certain, but it should be safe with that load, imo, I don't believe that a magnum primer is capable of raising the bar on such a small load of easily ignited powder. Bullseye ignites so easily that it seems unlikely that a magnum primer will increase ignition.
__________________
None.
briandg is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 01:07 PM   #3
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
100% plus safe. You might see a bit of increased pressure, but not enough to worry about. You might need to tweak the load a bit too.
You don't need magnum primers for .357 Mag loads either. Magnum primers have nothing whatever to do with the cartridge name. They're about the powder used, only.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 01:21 PM   #4
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
True, imo, I've never loaded magnums in my .357. The magnum primer is mostly related to case capacity and composition of the powder. .357 maximum using full loads of s lo powder, for example.
__________________
None.
briandg is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 03:07 PM   #5
Hammerhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
Might even have a slight decrease in pressure and velocity from the magnum primer pushing the bullet forward before the powder gets going.
Hammerhead is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 03:21 PM   #6
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
I'm with the others . . . You're not going to even notice the difference.

I once ran out of regular primers (CCI 500) with a similar loading (38 wadcutters), and I just substituted with CCI 550's and never even noticed the difference.

If we were talking a high performance/pressure round, we would be having a different conversation.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 06:05 PM   #7
Average Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,325
Most likely an increase of about 60 FPS. Nothing that you would even notice.
Average Joe is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 06:20 PM   #8
BillM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Amity Oregon
Posts: 791
Loaded 9mm with regular small pistol. Medium load, USPSA minor.

When primers were hard to get, picked up some magnum primers.

Same brass/bullet/powder/OAL.

Magnum loads were an average of 10 fps faster. Yup---ten.

What was interesting is that the extreme spread dropped from
20-25 fps down to under 10. The magnum primers were doing a much
better job of getting the powder lit up!

The only downside of using magnum instead of small pistol is with
small charges/low pressure plinking ammo, you may see some gas
leakage around the primer. Thicker primer cup, low pressure won't
get it sealed 100%. Never had it happen myself.
BillM is offline  
Old May 7, 2016, 10:05 PM   #9
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
Bill, there is also the question of whether the striker or h hammer would work, in some guns, but seriously, that Smith would have no issues. My stupid little .380 won't even function with plain cci. Over the last year, good Lord, I've run into so many petty little problems related to both factory and handloads that I'm at my wits end.
__________________
None.
briandg is offline  
Old May 8, 2016, 07:53 AM   #10
dahermit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
Quote:
The only downside of using magnum instead of small pistol is with
small charges/low pressure plinking ammo, you may see some gas
leakage around the primer. Thicker primer cup, low pressure won't
get it sealed 100%. Never had it happen myself.
How do you know that magnum primers have thicker cups than standard primers? From what I understand, the only difference between a standard primer and a magnum primer is the brusiance of the burning primer compound.
dahermit is offline  
Old May 8, 2016, 08:31 AM   #11
NoSecondBest
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 2,736
Got to love the internet for getting a good answer. The laws of probability say that one of them might be correct. Now to figure out which one...... The most probable one (at least the one I agree with the most) is that it's safe to shoot. Other than that, unless someone actually did some measurement with this scenario, they're just guessing. FWIW, I use magnum primers about 90% of the time and I have for years. I back all my loads off by 10% from what they're called for with standard primers and go from there. I do this so that I only have to keep one primer on hand and I never run out. Also, the cup thickness on handgun primers is the same whether it's a magnum or standard....again from the manufacturer. Those that chronographed some loads and offered some info are on the right track with providing an answer. Lots of answers are simply R&R answers (Read and Regurgitate). R&R answers are the least reliable. If in doubt, go to the source for reliable info.
NoSecondBest is offline  
Old May 8, 2016, 11:44 AM   #12
kerreckt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2011
Location: SE VA.
Posts: 216
I wouldn't worry about it. Go out and shoot them. I have done similar things on purpose and no damage was done. Hardly notice the difference.
kerreckt is offline  
Old May 10, 2016, 12:58 AM   #13
Hook686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2005
Location: USA The Great State of California
Posts: 2,090
I load .357 magnum using Alliant 2400 powder also. A few years ago I noticed that Alliant show magnum primers, where previously they showed standard primers. I inquired about the change. The response I received was essentially that that was what they had on the shelf the day they did the testing. Figure .1 to .2 grains of powder going from standard to magnum primers is my thought on the matter.
__________________
Hook686

When the number of people in institutions reaches 51%, we change sides.
Hook686 is offline  
Old May 10, 2016, 03:02 PM   #14
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
I'm pretty sure your 357 magnum will still be safe with a magnum primer under your 2.7gr Bullseye load. You may notice more variation in velocity, or less, or none. You may notice smaller, larger, or the same size groups. Most likely you might not see a difference.
TimSr is offline  
Old May 11, 2016, 06:28 AM   #15
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
Thank you for all the replies, I appreciate it I will
rebs is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05007 seconds with 10 queries