|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 3, 2013, 12:08 PM | #26 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
There's not nearly as much water in the air during a rain storm as some folks seem to believe.
Let's just use a simple thought process as an example. It may not be perfectly scientifically, mathematically correct but it's close enough to give you an idea. Let's say it's raining at a very heavy 5 inches per hour. This is at least 20% higher than, and more likely 2-5x higher than, an average rain fall. To get a really good number and put everybody to sleep, we'd have to use some fun calculus (Δt → 0) and other fun stuff. I'm going to guesstiproximate instead. Let's go with a 180gr .308 bullet at 2,600 fps MV. That bullet (according to JBM Ballistics) would take about 1.9 seconds to get to 1,000 yards. Let's call it 2 seconds for easy math. Let's do some simple extrapolation, A 5"/hour rain fall literally means that it takes one hour to fill a space with 5" water. There are 3,600 seconds in an hour. The bullet is in flight to 1,000 yards for 2 seconds. During that 2 seconds, only 2/3600ths of the total 1 hour rain will fall. That means that during the entire bullet flight time, the total amount of water in the air is 5 inches x 2 divided by 3,600 seconds. That's 1/360th of an inch (~0.0027777) of rain in that time. That amount is broken up evenly throughout the entire space. Let's consider the space taken up by the bullet. Let's make it a 1,000 yard cylinder, 0.308 inches diameter. We have a cylinder 3,000 feet (36,000 inches) long with a .308" diameter. The total volume of that cylinder is 2,682 cubic inches. An average raindrop might be about 0.078 inches in diameter. That's a volume of ~0.0019877 in3. In that 2 second flight time, we're only filling that entire cylinder with 1/360th of an inch of rain. That's a total volume of rain within that cylinder during time of flight of 0.000206955 in3. Look at those two numbers, total volume and rain drop volume.... there's more zeros in the total volume than there are in a single rain drop! That means that in the entire flight of the bullet, there will be less than one rain drop in it's entire path... ahead AND behind it! Not just "less than one", a single drop of rain is almost 10 times the total volume of water in that column during the entire bullets flight! You tell me. There's essentially 1 drop of water SOMEWHERE in the flight path of every 10th bullet. That's in front and behind. We could sort of almost consider that it would take 20 shots to get a single drop of rain to be somewhere in front of the bullet during it's time of flight. You wanna take the bet that you're going to hit one?
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
September 3, 2013, 04:11 PM | #27 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm still not worried about the waters effect though. |
||
September 3, 2013, 04:42 PM | #28 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
The math isn't technically valid, it's just for an example of the probability, but I'd point out that it doesn't suggest that 1 in 10 bullets would contact a drop. It suggests that only one in 10 bullets would even have water IN IT'S FLIGHT PATH, in front or behind it, during ANY portion of it's 2 second flight.
If that's even remotely close to true, even if it's pessimistic by a factor of 100, the odds of a bullet actually HITTING a drop of water are exceedingly small. They odds that they'd both be in the flight path ANYWHERE are about 1 in 10. The locations have to over-lap, not just both be somewhere in the flight path. For example, the bullet takes up roughly 1/36,000th of the flight path. The drop of water takes up about 1/461000th of the flight path. The odds that they'd randomly be in the same place at the same time would be something like, 1:357000 or something. Someone with more time will have to figure it if they'd like, I'm trying to do it between customers and pizza.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
September 3, 2013, 05:27 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
Density and heat...
A 2700fps 168gr jacketed .308 wouldn’t be the lest bit phased by a raindrop hit broadside. The raindrop perishes into water vapor - mostly converted to gas due to the heat. |
September 3, 2013, 05:33 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,670
|
How much does rain affect accuracy?
Quote:
|
|
September 3, 2013, 07:07 PM | #31 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
For the example I posted I used a calculated G1 BC of .734 for a 300 grain .338 Berger Bullets 300 grain hunting bullet has a listed G1 BC of .818 I used a temp of 65 degrees at sea level. A subsonic muzzle velocity of 1050fps. Here's what I came up with, with the lower BC of .734 Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
September 3, 2013, 08:26 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
All that said, I suspect that the actual effect would be, um, negligible.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
|
September 3, 2013, 08:47 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
I am not sure about the math, but I can tell you from personal experience that rain has a terrible effect on accuracy. It keeps wimpy people from practicing!
pax |
September 3, 2013, 08:57 PM | #34 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not 100% sure, but that is what I get from reading your calculations and developing my own method(I admit based off your method where the heavy lifting was accomplished). There was a time when this sort of problem would have been extremely simple for me, but all I deal with now is simple statistics and the word problem analytic training has faded. I might be off base in my thinking. Where the bullet is located or whether it is moving is actually irrelevant. In theory the chance that an object with the area of the bullet will get hit by a raindrop is the same whether the bullet is moving or still, at least in our simplified algebraic model. I'd have to consider what adding the bullet flying into raindrops instead of them just landing on top would do, but I am quite certain that would increase the likelihood of contact, not decrease. |
||
September 6, 2013, 07:33 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2006
Location: N. E. AZ
Posts: 387
|
I have noticed a very small increase in group size when raining. Maybe 20%? It is consistent but I think it is due to the humidity more thAn anything else. A little increased pressure at or near the barrel that varies with the strength of the rain.
But this is just an educated guess and I am an engineer. |
November 1, 2013, 12:55 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,694
|
I remember when we shot IMHSA handgun silhouette and several of us were shooting .44 magnums with cast, gas-checked SWC bullets. A spotter behind the shooter with a 36x spotting scope could see bullets going to the 200 meter rams when the sun was behind us. He could also see the bullets hitting raindrops, (or having the shock wave hit them) in a heavy rainstorm. There didn't appear to be any measurable effect on the bullets from the rain, but we didn't shoot especially accurately, say, 2 MOA.
|
November 1, 2013, 07:29 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
I've shot a few matches in the rain. No significant accuracy issues through 1000 yards in my opinion. But lots of folks blamed bad shots on raindrops.
Biggest problem I've heard of regarding accuracy was when the M14NM rifles first came out. Their flash supressors were small enough that rain drops on their inner surfaces deflected bullets enough to lose accuracy. After the services reamed them out, the problem went away shooting in the rain. But there were other problems with bullets barly skimming supressors on their way out, so the NM version was reamed out to allow clearance for that, to. There was even a gauge made to see if the supressor had enough clearance. |
November 25, 2013, 05:09 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2013
Location: Payson Az
Posts: 169
|
the only difference i can see where i live is that the humidity of the air would be greater than normal. I live in Az and on a humid day we have 15%-20% humidity so shooting in the rain (rarely happens here anyways) would cause the zero to be off due to the heavy air slowing the bullet down. a good friend had this issue when he went for a sniper school back east, he zeroed his rifle before he left in about 5% humidity and then when he got to 95% humidity he had to re-zero all over again due to it being way off.
|
November 30, 2013, 09:31 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
I have shot out to 600 yards in the rain and yes, when it is raining, my scores went down.
One assignable cause was water on the lenses of my shooting glasses, the muddy ground, the mat slick , the rifle being slick, and of course, wind. Sometimes when it rains, it blows. This is obvious when you are in rainy weather. Nasty gusting winds, such as I have shot in at Camp Perry, blow bullets all over the place. You can actually see circular wind patterns making their way through the grass. One range, we had to stand on our shooting mats because they would have blown away as the front came through, and I recall seeing one of those cheap styrofoam coolers tumbling down the range and flying over the berm. Shooting a good standing score becomes much harder when wind gusts are high enough to blow your scope stand over. I have shot smallbore in a drizzling rain. We managed to have pop up's so we shot mostly under cover, but I don't recall scores being especially stellar. You cannot see the target as well, because there is all that rain between my eye and target. This is obvious when you are actually there. I have never found that range where you can shoot in the rain without myself, or my equipment getting wet, and where there is no wind. Perhaps when I find a place with “dry rain” and no wind, I will find that my scores are not all that different from nice sunny 70 F weather. That will probably be in an alternate plane of existence.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. Last edited by Slamfire; November 30, 2013 at 09:38 PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|