|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 20, 2010, 06:21 AM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: West Central Missouri
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
As far as stripping the gun and turning in the receiver, I have no problem with that. What I do have a problem with is people advocating (Especially to a new member who really does not know) breaking the law.
__________________
Inside Every Bright Idea Is The 50% Probability Of A Disaster Waiting To Happen. |
|
September 20, 2010, 07:52 AM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
Quote:
There are two types of people that become politicians - those that are in love with power, status, and money; and those that honestly want to change something they find repugnant about the political establishment. Unfortunately the latter are about as rare and elusive as sasquatch. |
|
September 20, 2010, 02:20 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,936
|
Why is this subject rehashed over and over again? The answer is no, any way you want to slice and dice it. I can't change the laws, you can't change the laws, the law is not going to be changed. FWIW if someone brought a fully auto AK 47 from Nam, it was an illegal act. Any war time AK , had to be deactivated prior to being a war souvenir. When the army got done deactivating it, believe me it would never shoot again, even semi auto. I don't want to hurt any ones feelings , but only an idiot would keep arguing the point.
|
September 20, 2010, 04:38 PM | #54 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2009
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
September 20, 2010, 06:03 PM | #55 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
Quote:
The first is the National Firearms Act of 1934. This required specific paperwork and paying a $200 tax for a civilian to own a machinegun. Not too many vets returning from WWII cared for the paperwork or could spare the $200. They brought these guns back, but never registered them. Over the years, they have been destroyed or confiscated. Many were registered during a machinegun amnesty in 1968. They still turn up today, as this thread implies. The second thing was the 1968 Gun Control Act. This law required that imported firearms for civilians be considered "sporting". No more machinegun imports for the peasant class, including war trophies.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer NRA Life Member |
|
September 22, 2010, 08:19 PM | #56 |
Moderator in Memoriam
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,123
|
Enough of this
All the answers have already been posted. Rehashing them over and over is profitless.
CLOSED |
|
|