The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 25, 2013, 09:21 PM   #26
Chaz88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
I compact single stack 9mm might make me a Glock fan. I would have to do some serious comparisons to the other options. I bet the price point might be the deciding factor on it.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time.

No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it.
Chaz88 is offline  
Old November 25, 2013, 09:26 PM   #27
IdahoG36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,993
That's what I was thinking as well. Every Glock that I see new in the LGS is in the $550-$599 range, regardless of which model it is. I would think that for a single stack small Glock to be competitive, it would have to be in the $400-$500 range.
IdahoG36 is offline  
Old November 25, 2013, 10:06 PM   #28
TxFlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2011
Posts: 1,246
Guys we can speculate all we want, but since Glock is perfection why do you think they named it G42?


What is "the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything" mind blown
TxFlyFish is offline  
Old November 25, 2013, 10:09 PM   #29
Chaz88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
why do you think they named it G42?
I give up. Why?
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time.

No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it.
Chaz88 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 12:48 AM   #30
DaleA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
Jimbob86 in post #22 (was that post number on purpose?) and the link to the 'Who's on First' parody...Thanks.

It is an impressive piece.

There's more to it than just the .22/Forty miscommunication. There's the Glock 'slogan' - 'a slow gun seems silly'...and more.

Again, thanks.
DaleA is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 01:31 AM   #31
LockedBreech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
New line of Glock pistols

Glock is one of the major players in the market. This is news that matters to the shooting community at large.

My money is on .380, simply since people want 9mm and Glock, for all their great qualities, is hilariously bad at paying attention to what people want them to make.

Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; November 26, 2013 at 09:59 AM.
LockedBreech is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 02:06 AM   #32
vostracker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 416
G42

You guys are all wrong!! Its a mini-ar style rifle that you can pocker carry!! LOL!!!! I just like to see new guns come out so I can play with them.
vostracker is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 02:18 AM   #33
Psychedelic Bang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2009
Location: FL USA
Posts: 332
Its big news. Is it also, "exciting news?" depends... .380, not exciting imho. Excellent single stack 9? Fairly exciting.. Imho.

Price point? We have no idea, but its easy to find the xds and pps for just under $500.

We have to wait and see.
__________________
"Was always kinda partial to Roy Rogers actually. I really like those sequined shirts..."
Psychedelic Bang is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 08:39 AM   #34
Digger686
Member
 
Join Date: July 15, 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 63
Assuming that this does signal the introduction of a compact, single-stack Glock...

In my experience (and among my circle of friends), while most people own one or maybe two of these compact pistols, they are seen as functional for CCW. Very few people seem to accumulate significant numbers of these types of pistol as they might with medium or large frame pistols or revolvers.

I wonder how many people have already satisfied their demand for a small and thin gun by buying one of the many offerings from other manufacturers? Will many have actually held off buying in the hope that Glock would eventually offer a similar pistol?
Digger686 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 08:42 AM   #35
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
If Glock really is coming out with a "pocket gun", it'll be interesting to see if they go to a true DAO trigger. It's hard for me to imagine carrying a "locked & cocked" SAO, or Glock-action pistol in a pocket.
Skans is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:14 AM   #36
Viper99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 846
If Glock comes up with single stack 9mm or 380 or both, I am all over them.
Viper99 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:20 AM   #37
Captains1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: West of the Blue Ridge, VA
Posts: 684
Quote:
Assuming that this does signal the introduction of a compact, single-stack Glock...

In my experience (and among my circle of friends), while most people own one or maybe two of these compact pistols, they are seen as functional for CCW. Very few people seem to accumulate significant numbers of these types of pistol as they might with medium or large frame pistols or revolvers.

I wonder how many people have already satisfied their demand for a small and thin gun by buying one of the many offerings from other manufacturers? Will many have actually held off buying in the hope that Glock would eventually offer a similar pistol?
Good point. I personally got tired of waiting for Glock to offer a single stack sub compact 9mm, and therefore own a Ruger LC9 and a Springfield XDs. I feel that the XDs is the closest thing to a Glock, and I really do enjoy the pistol. If the Glock 42 is indeed a single stack 9mm of similar size, I will certainly purchase one and likely sell off the XDs assuming I'm happy with the Glock, no need for both. I'll probably give it at least a year or so though this time as I've learned my lesson the hard way buying newly released guns early.
Captains1911 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:21 AM   #38
thedudeabides
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
Glock has SIGitis.

They once made a few good guns that worked.

Now they make lots of guns, some of which don't work, some of which don't work well, and some of which don't make sense.

It takes HK half of a decade to come up with a new product line. Glock has one every few weeks.

Some would argue it's dumb NOT to make a pocket pistol in our hysterical society where everyone now has a CCW permit and wants smaller and smaller (to me these are useless) guns. Even Colt is making a small plastic gun these days.

I say that there are enough small guns out there that work only sometimes and have lousy triggers. Now there's another. This fad won't stop until people realize that you can't have a pocket gun that works as well as a 44 ounce full size target pistol, or that 4" is about the right size for the barrel of a carry gun.
__________________
OK, so not all plastic guns are bad
thedudeabides is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:23 AM   #39
Captains1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: West of the Blue Ridge, VA
Posts: 684
Quote:
I say that there are enough small guns out there that work only sometimes and have lousy triggers. Now there's another. This fad won't stop until people realize that you can't have a pocket gun that works as well as a 44 ounce full size target pistol, or that 4" is about the right size for the barrel of a carry gun.
Sounds to me like you aren't familiar enough with the current offerings on the market to make such a statement.
Captains1911 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:26 AM   #40
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
I cannot wait. I've never liked pocket pistols and quite honestly always hated them.

Now since Glock is going to make a few. I think I may give them a try again! really amped about it.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:31 AM   #41
thedudeabides
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Sounds to me like you aren't familiar enough with the current offerings on the market to make such a statement.
Funny story, I went through the entire process of finding a small 380 for my wife and shot just about every one on the market... here's the breakdown

LCP: FTE, FTF, pins come out of frame after shooting 300 rounds

P238: fine if you just feed it ball ammo, won't feed all defense rounds, trigger pull is 8 pounds

Bodyguard: Soviet era revolvers have a nicer trigger pull

LC9: Rear sights fell off, was a gun range rental. Gun range had two, sights fell off of both of them.

P290: had the first gen version, soft primer strikes and terrible trigger

XDs 9mm: recalled. Came back with a harsh trigger pull, trigger reset funny

Colt Mustang polymer: fit and finish woefully bad for a Colt. The one I have seems to work, tho.

PPK/S: nice gun, but it's large

PPS: nice gun, but it's large
__________________
OK, so not all plastic guns are bad
thedudeabides is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:46 AM   #42
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
lol I don't get why some people join a thread just to complain about something that the thread is entirely about. There are other threads going on you know, where you can actually give positive feedback on whatever you like.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:57 AM   #43
Chaz88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
I don't get why some people join a thread just to complain about something that the thread is entirely about. There are other threads going on you know, where you can actually give positive feedback on whatever you like.
I like having both sides of the opinion coin. Might save me some money and frustration making my choices. Besides I think they have whole websites for just fawning over your favorite maker of whatever.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time.

No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it.
Chaz88 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 09:59 AM   #44
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,212
Quote:
lol I don't get why some people join a thread just to complain about something that the thread is entirely about. There are other threads going on you know, where you can actually give positive feedback on whatever you like.
I second what Chaz said. If we had entire threads of folks constantly agreeing with each other it would be a pretty boring place. Discussion is a good thing. Besides, that silly first amendment is just as important as the second.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 10:00 AM   #45
SPEMack618
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
This thread was worth it simply for the Tam/Caleb script. Hilarity. Got some stares from my fellow cubicle farm mates.

Forgive my ignorance, but what faint outline in the flyer?
__________________
NRA Life Member
Read my blog!
"The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!"
SPEMack618 is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 10:01 AM   #46
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
Still..in a general sense it doesn't make sense. That's like me joining a Taurus forum then.

I really think they're going to have single stacks in .380, 9mm, and .40

It's going to be really cool.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 10:02 AM   #47
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
New line of Glock pistols

One post deleted and those referencing it edited. The edited posts aren't really a problem in themselves but please use the report post button instead. Posts with no intelligent content don't deserve responses.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 10:26 AM   #48
TxFlyFish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2011
Posts: 1,246
It's not necessarily how saturated the market is with pocket pistols. Glock has a huge loyalty base, it will sell, even if everyone came up with the same gun already
TxFlyFish is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 10:42 AM   #49
Ozzieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
Nakanokalronin
THANK YOU for the photo
__________________
It was a sad day when I discovered my universal remote control did not in fact control the universe.

Did you hear about the latest study.....5 out of 6 liberals say that Russian Roulette is safe.
Ozzieman is offline  
Old November 26, 2013, 11:23 AM   #50
Garycw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
New line of Glock pistols

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedudeabides View Post
Funny story, I went through the entire process of finding a small 380 for my wife and shot just about every one on the market... here's the breakdown


P238: fine if you just feed it ball ammo, won't feed all defense rounds, trigger pull is 8 lb
That's BS and have never had any FTF problems with the 5 or 6 I've used. I did however polish the feed ramp. Although it was probably not needed, I just do it to all semi autos. I've never measured what the trigger pull is, but doesn't feel like 8 lb either.
It's funny how people think a lot of guns are terrible except for the one they have.
I always thought Glocks answer to the small CCW was the 26? I'm guessing this will be a 380 version.
Garycw is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.13444 seconds with 11 queries