|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14, 2014, 02:47 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
|
Is this confiscation through attrition
I guess death could be called a form of attrition in this case.
Police in Buffalo are grabbing all guns of deceased handgun permit holders and not telling family members that the law applies only to handguns,and does not apply to long guns. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/14...cmp=latestnews
__________________
In my hour of darkness In my time of need Oh Lord grant me vision Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons |
November 14, 2014, 03:10 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
My family ran into this in the late 1960s. My parents were in an auto accident, and while they both came out ok, with minor injuries, there were fatalities in the accident.
They learned that if my father had died, his handgun collection would have had to have been surrendered to the police, absent any other permit holders in the household. (NY handguns are listed on the permit by make, caliber, serial number and barrel length). At that time, and in that place, if they were turned in to the State Patrol, they would keep them 30 days, and then destroy them (so we were told). If they were turned in to the Sherriff, and a permit applied for, they would be kept until the permit was approved or denied. Mom applied for her permit the next week. Both my brother and I applied for ours as soon as we reached the practical age. This has been the law there for a long time. Long guns are not, and never were part of that law. Police seizing rifles and shotguns from the deceased is simply theft from the estate. A case can be made in certain circumstances for the police to hold them secure, temporarily, pending disposition of the estate, but as a general practice, absolutely not!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
November 14, 2014, 03:38 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
"Gee...I don't know what my dad with his guns before he died" *shrugs*
|
November 14, 2014, 04:38 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Correct, its not a new law they're just dusting off & acting on an old law. They don't seem to understand it, but by George they're acting on it.
Hint if your older relatives own firearms get a permit anyway just to insulate yourself from this stupidity. "They" know where & who you are anyway.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 14, 2014, 04:48 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
May be an old law, butit is still a rather stupid one. Needs to be challenged
|
November 14, 2014, 10:56 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Quote:
or to the general stupidity of a permit system in general? As to a challenge, good luck with that. NY city was where modern gun control began with the Sullivan laws. The entire state adopted a permit system within a few decades, and its been that way ever since. NY's permit system is intense, and unlike many other states, the permit is not a blanket permit for you to possess any handgun. you are only legal to possess those specific guns listed on your permit. By Serial number, among other things. On the plus side, more than one person can have the same gun on their permit, so a family can provide a safe legal path to continue ownership of the handguns(s). If there is no one else permitted for the gun(s) they police are required to take it. If, as the report indicate, the police are taking all the guns of a deceased (long guns) they are exceeding their lawful authority. It may be nothing more than a gun grab, or it may be skewed reporting of a situation where handguns were taken in accordance with the law, and other guns were taken at the same time to secure them from "walking away". Ultimately what happens to the guns will determine if it was theft, or "protective custody".
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
November 14, 2014, 11:19 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
I think the law is invalid as a theft of estate assets. Simply because there is no New York heir that may lawfully take possession does not mean that the guns cannot be legally sold out of state as part of the estate administration, or that an out of state relative cannot lawfully inherit them. Since a handgun collection can easily run in the multiple thousands of dollars, I as an heir would be really ****** if the state took not only the guns but the value of the guns. Sure sounds like a "taking" for which compensation is owed.
|
November 14, 2014, 11:34 PM | #8 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
|
|
November 15, 2014, 07:04 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
I have also heard stories where confiscated guns were never returned to anyone, heir or other wise. They simply disappeared from the possession of the police.
Case in point a friend turned in his pistols when he moved to a new state because it was the law since he didn't have a valid permit in the new state. The police were supposed to hold them until he got his new permit. He turned in 5 pistols and only got back 2, the 3 most expensive ones were lost while in police possession. They basically told him they didn't know who could have removed them from police storage and there was nothing they could do about it. He was simply out the 3 guns. |
November 15, 2014, 10:28 AM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
However, I suspect that such shenanigans are not limited to that department. A few years ago I went to the indoor range where I often shoot, opened the door from the parking lot, and nearly walked into a HUGE gun safe that was on the landing just inside the door. Turns out it was the entire gun collection of a man who was going through a divorce and had been served with a protective order -- which meant that he couldn't possess or have access to firearms until the order was lifted. Rather than entrust his guns to the local police (who, to their credit, didn't want to be responsible for them anyway), he preferred to pay the FFL a fee and have the entire armory stored at the range. That safe stayed there for at least six months, probably longer. And then one day -- it was gone. End of story. |
|
November 15, 2014, 12:54 PM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Most of the time, most places, things like this do not happen, but, there have been cases of police taking guns (for any reason) and refusing to return them. Once case I heard of (ages ago) a judge ordered the return (finding in favor of the gun owner) and the police still refused.
They did cut him a check, though.... To my mind, there are things that money cannot replace. Just one example is my grandfather's shotgun, which has been in my family over 100 years and will someday go to my most suitable grandchild. The market value of that gun is a only few hundred dollars. The emotional and historical value to my family is not something that can be calculated in money. Having a gun like that "legally" stolen by uniformed bureaucrats with badges would be a tremendous tragedy.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
November 15, 2014, 02:25 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
I had a rather distinctive match rifle. It had a stock made of an early type of laminated wood, back before such stocks were "in". Because of that & the thumb-hole configuration it was a stand out in a crowd, or on a firing line. The light/dark wood's "tiger striping" was highly visible, very unusual & quite eye-catching, even though that wasn't the purpose of the wood choice. These were primarily made, pretty much exclusively, by an individual, who I happened to know. "Plywood" stocks were considered Gauche at the time & so were rare. A shooting occurred & the recovered projectile was identified as having been fired from that exact type & caliber of rifle. The shooting was high profile as well, a convicted (& extraordinarily depraved rape/killer who violated the victims after death & specialized in nurses) psychopath was only able to be given a light sentence based on technicalities. When he was released after a very short sentence he was shot dead exactly as he exited the prison property by an unknown & never identified marksman. Because of the outcry all rifles of that caliber & type in the region were called in for ballistic testing, mine included. Being a good citizen group all the shooters with the same model & I complied willingly to help expedite the investigation. Months pass & the match shooting season begins. Everyone I talked to had their rifles returned, but not me. I inquired at the local police station & the firearms Sargent agreed to pursue it as it was abnormally long. Time passed & he got stonewalled, he was quite frustrated by the process. Meanwhile I'm shooting matches with a (technically quasi-legally) borrowed rifle. We were most of the way through the season & during a break for swapping ends I wandered down the firing line "checking out the competition" a fairly normal thing to do several others were doing the exact same thing. Guess what I see? Yup a tiger-striped rifle identical to mine! I went over to look as it was obviously someone else who had the same custom stock maker. Now it gets weirder, it had the same serial number! I checked with the R/O & guess who was registered to that point on the firing line? The PD from the town where my rifle was sent for testing. The firearms Sergeant & I subsequently discovered my rifle had been "lost in processing, after legal surrender" & they had to both financially re-reimburse me (that took 3 years) & have the documented serial number struck off as "Lost in Custody" & the "slot" cleared on my permit, so I could never be involved if it ever came up on a "hot sheet".
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” Last edited by wogpotter; November 15, 2014 at 02:33 PM. |
|
November 15, 2014, 11:57 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2013
Location: Albany Park, Chicago
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
|
|
November 16, 2014, 01:14 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,312
|
wogpotter-could you have raised a stink right there at the match and called the police when you recognized your stolen ('cause in my opinion that's what it was, stolen) rifle on the line?
That's a very distressing story. |
November 16, 2014, 08:58 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
No kidding, whoever walked that $1000 rifle out of the storage room knew it wasn't his. At least one sworn officer needs to be fired, for cause, and jailed for grand larceny.
When you egregiously violate the public trust, that's what needs to happen. See how someone likes spending the rest of his working life as a mall security guard or line cook. |
November 16, 2014, 11:04 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2014
Location: DFW north
Posts: 377
|
Wogpoter, was the rifle insured through your home owners insurance? If you were reimbursed from the man, I guess they might not do anything. I would still let them know what happened. They might be able to help. Personally, I would want to buy the gun back for the reimbursement price.
One thing. Do you often travel through the jurisdiction where your gun was stolen?
__________________
Z |
November 17, 2014, 08:59 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
I really can't comment on what happened after the tale described.
I assume the relevant authorities did what was necessary for justice to be served. This was long a go & far away where legit Police despised "bent" one far more than "honest" criminals.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 17, 2014, 09:22 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2014
Location: DFW north
Posts: 377
|
I see. It still sucks. I hope I would be able to handle the situation at the event as well as you did.
__________________
Z |
November 17, 2014, 11:53 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
It was a different world.
I was on friendly terms with the local PD, I was on good terms with the local firearms sergeant as well. We respected the police officer for doing a hard unpleasant, but necessary job. They treated us with respect as we'd proven we were good, responsible individuals. There was very little of the combativeness between the two at that time in that place. In a way it made the actions of the individual more shocking as it was so unusual. Because of that once you passed the information to the authorities you had a sure knowledge that it would be dealt with appropriately.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 17, 2014, 08:00 PM | #20 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
|
Quote:
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:56 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
NY has dug up this old law that has largely ignored for ages, and is simply exploiting it to the extent that people's ignorance of their rights during a time of grief will allow it. From what I read, (no link, I don't remember where), there is a 10 day period and a procedure for heirs to applly for the required permits, but if they are anaware, and caught off guard, as is common with people grieving, they will snag up every gun that the relatives think they have to relenquish. They will also not inform them of what guns they do not have to give up, or about their procedural rights for hanging on to them.
It is my understanding that these intimidation tactics are not a statewide policy of policing, but rather a Buffalo PD abuse, though I'm sure there are other PDs in NY that intimidate gun owners. |
November 20, 2014, 05:18 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
|
|