The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 30, 2017, 09:10 AM   #1
HALL,AUSTIN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2011
Location: asheville north carolina
Posts: 556
Anyone hunt with their SBR?

I remember a thread where someone posted their 10.5" AR that they hog hunt with so I wanted to see if anyone else hunts with theirs aswell. Wondering if it's common practice or a rare thing. I could see it being a pain to travel to other states to hunt with an SBR, but I could also see the positive side of it. Shorter with a suppressor, easier to maneuver through the thick stuff, ect.

Didn't know where to post this, moderators if you think this is better suited for the NFA section message me and I'll post it there.
HALL,AUSTIN is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 09:34 AM   #2
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,715
I don't have an SBR or pistol AR (same barrels), but I know folks who hunt with both. Most of the SBR hunters use them in combination with suppressors, shorter, lighter platforms. They are hog hunters who find it much easier to be getting in and out of vehicles with their rifles, going over fences, etc. if they have smaller, lighter weapons, plus they are that much easier to carry. They make fun of me and my behemoth rifle and complain when having to pass it over the fence.

I am not as much of a fan of the shorter barrels because of the reduced velocity. It isn't a huge amount, but depending on the particular gun and caliber, for some, their 50-100 yard shots are like shooting 400-450 yards in terms if impact velocity.

What we have never stopped to study for them (usually because of time) is just how well their projectiles are or are not performing. It would be interesting to know if they are really loosing any real performance or not at typical hog hunting distances. I suspect they must be, but haven't done the necropsies and so don't have proof. If so, just just means you need to choose your shots a bit more carefully.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 10:35 AM   #3
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
You could go with a pinned suppressor making the SBR legal length.
Mobuck is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 05:49 PM   #4
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,715
Yeah, but you still gotta do the paperwork on the suppressor and deal with the wait time.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 09:10 PM   #5
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"Yeah, but you still gotta do the paperwork on the suppressor and deal with the wait time."
yes, IF you already have a stamped SBR
You're going to have to ask permission to cross state lines for either, correct??
Mobuck is offline  
Old June 30, 2017, 10:43 PM   #6
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,235
Sounds like someone needs to create an 8" Muzzle Brake of Destiny
rickyrick is offline  
Old July 1, 2017, 06:28 AM   #7
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
" if they are really loosing any real performance or not at typical hog hunting distances. I suspect they must be, but haven't done the necropsies and so don't have proof."
While there may be a few bullets designed specifically to perform on game at sub-sonic muzzle velocities, the more common bullets fail miserably. About the only thing you can expect is for them to make a hole. I've not been able to recover any of the 208 grain tipped or 190 BTHP match type bullets I've shot into water filled milk jugs. They veer off line and exit in random directions before expending their energy. Some show significant energy dump(tumble) while some just make a .30 cal hole and fly away.
I have ZERO confidence and don't use sub-sonic(centerfire) ammo on game.
Mobuck is offline  
Old July 14, 2017, 06:50 PM   #8
WV_gunner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 938
Not a SBR but I have a Draco. I finally got my single point sling on, just need to get my scope mount finished. I wanting to get a linear compensator.
WV_gunner is offline  
Old July 14, 2017, 07:07 PM   #9
Spur0701
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2005
Posts: 208
I went on a boar hunt once with a Colt SMG.........it had a 10.5 inch barrel.
Spur0701 is offline  
Old July 14, 2017, 11:39 PM   #10
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
I have killed a pretty good number of game animals with barrels as short as 4", 5", 6", 7-1/2" and 8-3/8". Deer, elk, black bear, antelope and a buffalo.
All revolvers however, in 357 mag, 44 mag and 45, and 454 Casull.

So if I can do it with standard revolvers all with issue iron sights, I have no doubt someone can do it with carbines with short barrels.
Wyosmith is offline  
Old July 15, 2017, 05:29 AM   #11
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,295
I can't see why not. In Arizona you would be perfectly legal to hunt with an NFA SBR with suppressor and standard capacity magazines. I'd I had the scratch to buy one, I would.
armoredman is offline  
Old July 16, 2017, 02:08 AM   #12
alex0535
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 908
Suppressor hunting is legal here, if it becomes less hassle to get a supressor I would sacrifice a bit of velocity for the ease of portability and maneuvering through the woods If it wouldn't be crazy loud to shoot.

Every animal I've ever shot or seen shot in person was inside 150 yards. 3500 fps isn't necessary to kill a whitetail deer or smaller animal inside 100 yards. Put into through heart/lungs a deer won't know the difference between 2000fps and 3500fps.
alex0535 is offline  
Old July 17, 2017, 10:18 PM   #13
ed308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 2016
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,147
A 6.8 SBR is perfect. Most only go to 12". You don't loose much by shorten the 6.8.
ed308 is offline  
Old July 17, 2017, 11:44 PM   #14
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
There's a feller in my neck of the woods that sold 95% of his substantial rifle and revolver collection after SBR-ing and suppressing a Marlin 1895 in .45-70.

I don't remember his exact words, but they were to the effect of:
"Once you're a ghost, you don't ever want to be a mortal again."

Translation: "I killed more stuff. I learned to be quieter and get closer. Not making excessive noise makes follow-up shots much easier. I enjoyed it a helluva lot more. And I no longer need those other guns."
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old July 18, 2017, 04:29 PM   #15
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,235
Stalking is my favorite way to hunt... I'm not the best hunter, but enjoy it all the same.
rickyrick is offline  
Old July 19, 2017, 07:43 AM   #16
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"Suppressor hunting is legal here, if it becomes less hassle to get a supressor I would sacrifice a bit of velocity for the ease of portability and maneuvering through the woods If it wouldn't be crazy loud to shoot.

Every animal I've ever shot or seen shot in person was inside 150 yards. 3500 fps isn't necessary to kill a whitetail deer or smaller animal inside 100 yards. Put into through heart/lungs a deer won't know the difference between 2000fps and 3500fps."

Adding a 7-10" suppressor isn't going to make that SBR any shorter (and likely longer) than a non-SBR carbine. Therefore, less portable and maneuverable through the woods.

That's the problem, 2000 fps isn't sub-sonic. To get the quietness, you don't "sacrifice a bit of velocity", you drop to 1050 FPS which is below the expansion levels of most bullets.
Just "reducing" the muzzle signature is quite an advantage and often leaves the game bewildered as to shooter location. You don't "become a ghost" unless using sub-sonic ammo which limits your range to approx 100 yards. Not everyone hunts in the middle of a thicket.
Mobuck is offline  
Old July 19, 2017, 03:01 PM   #17
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
More quietness?
Less loudness?

Open to interpretation and influenced by one's views about what loads would be expected to be used, I guess.

The 'Ghost'?... He runs subs.
Last I heard from him, he was running BTB 525 gr Piledrivers at about 1,000 fps (to ensure they're still sub-sonic at altitude in cold weather).
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old July 19, 2017, 06:28 PM   #18
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,235
Ive never hunted suppressed, or used a suppressed weapon. What I do know at some distance beyond 100yds, but not too much further, you can actually hear the bullet smack the animal. (yeah, yeah, I hunt without hearing protection) at least, I can hear it.

It's just close enough that you can hear the bullet strike, but far enough that the bullet has traveled to the target and the sound has traveled back after the sound of the gun firing is gone. Too close, it's masked by the gun... too far and you can't hear it.

My question is this; can you hear a more pronounced bullet strike in a suppressed firearm?
rickyrick is offline  
Old July 20, 2017, 07:36 AM   #19
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
I have no interest in SBRs but if I did did make one I would agree with ED308 and make it a 12" 6.8.

The ongoing debate between the 6.5Gren and the 6.8 SPC is something I have a lot of real-world experience with as a gunsmith and as a hunter.
In a nutshell I call it this way:

"6.8 for short barrels. 6.5 for long barrels."

Having killed 33 head of game myself with 6.8 and seen killed about 30 others. I have reports from about 60 more kills on top of those from friends and customers that use my guns. I have a good idea what to expect from 10 yards to 435 yards.
I have killed 6 with the 6.5 Gren and seen 8 others killed. Ranges for the 6.5G kills were between 60 yards and 385 yards. I also own a chronograph and so what I know is knowledge, not theory.

For performance in the game-field it's best to think of the 6.5 as a rifle shell and the 6.8 as a carbine shell. The 6.8 SPC does gain more speed between 16" and 20" than I thought it would, but nothing I can do with a 6.8 will beat the 6.5 in 20 to 24 inch barrels, and the .277 bullets don't hold their velocity as well. (they hold it well enough to make it an honest 1/4 mile gun, and that's all I'd want from it anyway)

With 125 Gr .264 Nosler Partitions, the 6.5 Gren is an honest 600 yard hunting gun. It's accurate even farther, but not all that deadly out past 600 as the bullets that can expand at 200 yards don't open much (or at all) at 700.
So the Gren is a better target rifle (by far) but the 6.8 kills a bit better at close range out to about 250. At 300 yards I can't see any difference on game as far as the size of the wounds and how fast they drop.

The other side of the coin is this;
loading for 16" and shorter barrels, (which makes the Gern fans mad, but it's a fact) the 6.8s I have made actually out run the 6.5 Grens I have made in 16" and shorter barrels, and sometime out run the Gren by as much as 125 FPS.

You can shoot the 125 Gr Nosler Part in the 6.5 and that makes it the best killing combination I have seen in that bore size. Most of the .264 bullets I have tried for long range flight and for accuracy were so-so on game. Not the Nosler 125 partition. It's a perfect bullet for the Gren. at nearly 400 yards it worked perfectly and at 30 yards it worked perfectly. I have been told by a friend it's fine at 550 too, and I believe him. (I was not there when he killed that big deer, but I did the butchering for him and the wound through the ribs and meat behind the foreleg was perfect.

The 6.8 SPC works well with a handful of bullets on game. From 85 grain to 130 grain. In fact, other than the 90 grain Speer TNT, all the most accurate .277 bullets I have tried have been hunting bullets. The Sierra Match king and the Matrix bullets doing well, but not as well as the Barnes, Sierra, Nosler and Hornady bullets.
The 90 Gr TNT was one of the most accurate bullet I have shot, going under 1/2 MOA in several guns, but are designed to blow up, and even at the lower velocities of the 6.8 compared to the 270, they still blow up. Can't blame a bullet for working as advertised however.

Anyway coming back to the point of the OP, I agree with Ed308. If you want an SBR on an AR, the 6.8 SPC is probably the best choice you could make.
Wyosmith is offline  
Old July 21, 2017, 12:11 AM   #20
ed308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 5, 2016
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,147
Excellent points Wyosmith. Now, how would the 270AR or 7mm Valkyrie compare to the 6.8 and 6.5 Gren? Either would make a great SBR.
ed308 is offline  
Old July 21, 2017, 06:28 AM   #21
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"My question is this; can you hear a more pronounced bullet strike in a suppressed firearm?"

Yes quite distinctly most of the time. With a 22 or the 300AAC, there's plenty of lag time even @ 100 yards to hear the whack at the backstop. With full power .223, that would be about 200. I shot a deer @ 175 with my 6.8 using full power ammo and a Harvester last fall. The sound of a broadside chest hit was unmistakable and all the other deer turned toward where the stricken deer had been standing. Hitting a coyote with a suppressed .223 is less distinct as those fast little bullets don't seem to have the "thump factor".
Mobuck is offline  
Old July 21, 2017, 09:00 AM   #22
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
"how would the 270AR or 7mm Valkyrie compare to the 6.8 and 6.5 Gren?"

Ed308, you got me on that one. I have no experience with those 2 cartridges.


What is easy to do is to know how well they will work on game by simply comparing their striking velocity at any given distance to the same bullet at the same striking velocity from another shell. I knew exactly what I'd get from my 6.8 with a WW 130 grain bullet, because I have used that bullet from my 270 Winchester. I reasoned that the kills I made with it from my 6.8 at about 250 yards would be the same as the kills I made with it at 450yd from my 270 Win. Yup, worked exactly the same.
If we look at the BC of that bullet and know the 270 Win starts it at 3100 FPS and the 6.8 started it at 2500 FPS the velocity at 250 yards from the 6.8 is the same as the velocity of the same bullet shot from a 270 Win at 450 yards.

Function and velocities from short barreled rifles are questions I think you'd have to ask the owners of the rifles. Everyone that comes up with something new is going to tell you "it's the best". Ask the owners, not the makers.
Wyosmith is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.13790 seconds with 10 queries