|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 7, 2017, 11:34 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2015
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 44
|
+P in a M642-1 is ok, but not in a M10-5 4” barrel
How come? That K-framed 10-5 (tapered barrel) certainly seems more stout than that lightweight 642-1.
S&W replied to an email and said that +P wasn’t certified in the 10-5... “Lastly, Smith and Wesson firearms did not start to be rated for Plus P until 1997. Any firearm made before that is not rated for use of Plus P ammunition.” Any theories?
__________________
Genius and insanity are close neighbors |
December 7, 2017, 11:44 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,568
|
The metal has to be sufficiently hardened to handle the pressure. It's the cylinder that has to take the pressure, since that is where the pressure will peak, not the barrel. Pressure tends to peak after only limited bullet travel.
Perhaps - they aren't confident that the metallurgy of the pre-1997 is up to a diet of extra pressure loads. either way, it's their advice. |
December 8, 2017, 06:48 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,767
|
Well, they're right. The 10-5 wasn't rated for P+. Of course there was no such thing as P+ back in it's day. I personally wouldn't hesitate to fire them from time to time in any S&W or Colt made since World War II. The gun is not going to blow up in your hand. In THEORY, if you shoot enough of them, you might loosen the gun up to the point you'd have to have some maintenance done. That would probably take about a truck-load of ammo, but you could probably do it.
I own three Model 10's. A 10-2, and a couple of -5's. I don't shoot P+ in them because I don't see much sense in shooting expensive ammo to punch a hole in a piece of paper. If I was ever going to use one of them for self-defense, yea, I might shoot a few just to check the point of impact and recoil, but in my experience neither of those change enough to really worry about. YMMV
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 (NKJV) |
December 8, 2017, 08:32 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
|
so same material and process to make a model 19 cylinder was used for the model 10 cylinder (except for size) and the model 10 "can't" shoot" .38 +p? this story is only because (as mentioned above) the +p designation wasn't used back then....Hi-Vel made a 110 gr. .38 special load for the border patrol way back yon...... it was essentially a light .357 load. just throwing that out there....
|
December 8, 2017, 07:09 PM | #5 | ||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Quote:
First off, there is a difference between the model 19 and model 10 cylinders, and that is the heat treatment S&W applies. They aren't the same. Magnum cylinders get a different heat treatment than standard calibers. Does this make a difference? I'd say at .38+p pressures, no, but at magnum pressures, yes. second, S&W is not saying you cannot use +p in the model 10. They are saying they don't "rate" or "certify" the model 10 for +p ammo. The difference is subtle, but important. What is missing is the explanation WHY S&W doesn't rate that gun for +p. It has nothing to do with the gun's strength, it has to do with legal liability. S&W never tested the model 10 with +p ammo. And since they never did their own tests, they will not rate/certify the gun for ammo they didn't test in it, on the record. Off the record, guys who work there will tell you the gun is plenty strong enough, and you can look at NY, Chicago, and LA PDs using those guns with +p ammo for decades without issues due to +p pressures. Quote:
HOWEVER, they asked that at 1,000 rounds you return the gun to Colt for inspection, and possible repair. And every thousand rounds there after, as well. Very few people would ever hit that round count from that kind of gun, but if you did, Colt wanted to check the gun, just to be sure everything was ok. Personally, I put 1,000 rounds far below a "truckload".
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
||
December 8, 2017, 11:45 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,767
|
Quote:
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 (NKJV) |
|
December 9, 2017, 12:28 PM | #7 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Quote:
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
December 9, 2017, 01:36 PM | #8 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
There is no problem whatever in using +P in a 10-5.
None. Zero. Denis |
December 9, 2017, 02:13 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
|
+P ammo is a joke. It is not as powerful as real 38 special ammo used to be when it was first loaded to replace the 38 Long Colt. Now 38 special ammo is no better than the old 38 Colt round that had such a bad reputation in the Philippine war.
Here is the best summery I have ever read concerning +P ammo written by a poster here named Saxon Pig. http://shootingwithhobie.blogspot.co...-saxonpig.html |
December 9, 2017, 02:17 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,753
|
If anyone remembers the gun writer named Jan Libourel who wrote for Guns & Ammo for many years he stated S&W told him they heat treat the 38 special and 44 special cylinders the same way they heat treat the 357 and 44 mag cylinders.
So I think you will be safe shooting the weaker +P ammo in your gun. |
December 9, 2017, 04:53 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
The old s&w rule used to be, if it had a model number, it was safe with +P.
That said, I've shot a couple hundred rounds of +P in my pre-Model 10...it eats them like candy.
__________________
The past is gone...the future may never happen. Be Here Now. |
December 11, 2017, 05:46 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
|
|
December 11, 2017, 05:49 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
|
Here's my well used 1942 M&P pictured with some of the 500 rounds of Remington +P and 600 rounds of my own +P+ that I put through it in a two week period to see if anything would happen. Came as no surprise at all that nothing did.
|
December 11, 2017, 07:03 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
|
Regarding Smith's response to the OP about use of plus P .38s, it's
true if Smith says so that they didn't mark the barrels +P until 1997. I think that came about because so many questions were being asked about the J-frame Smiths. The response the OP got from Smith was a blanket response but I really doubt it actually refers in practice to the K-frame models. Someone at the home office took the conservative route and pointed to the Plus P markings for a J-frame. I doubt the Smith responder had any more technical knowledge of the company's metallurgical history than Mother Teresa. Well, maybe a little more than that sainted lady. But not much. I don't believe any K-frames were ever so marked. And history and practice indicates the K-frames in steel are perfectly adequate to handle the so-called Plus Ps. |
December 11, 2017, 07:28 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
|
Quote:
1997 is when S&W began using the new “J Magnum” frame on all their J frames. Hence the new 357 magnum J frames and the 38 Special guns being rated for +P. For K frames guns, S&W has long stated that if they are model marked (about 1957 forward) they are safe with +P. Jim |
|
December 12, 2017, 08:10 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
|
I am looking at an old Smith and Wesson Revolver owner’s manual with “Revised 6/93” printing date. It contains a revolver ammunition chart in which it clearly states that a Model 10 (no dash number specified) is marked as rated for +P 38 Special ammunition. It has a further warning that +P ammunition should not be used in revolvers produced prior to 1958.
Horse’s mouth. A number of J-frames with steel frames were rated for +P prior to 1997, but not all for some reason. None of the aluminum framed revolvers were so rated until the introduction of the J-magnum frame in 1997. Some model 640’s were marked +P+ but mine is not.
__________________
Laz I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody. Last edited by Laz; December 12, 2017 at 08:17 PM. |
December 12, 2017, 09:14 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,526
|
I wouldn't be afraid to shoot +p out of a model 10. I doubt that you could tell the difference in wear over standard pressure loads.
|
|
|