|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24, 2011, 10:44 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2005
Location: central Louisiana
Posts: 469
|
Ruger Redhawk Choice: .45 Colt--4.20" barrel OR .44 Magnum--5.50 barrel
I am about to purchase one of these two guns. A Redhawk .45 Colt with the 4.20" barrel and the Hogue Monogrip OR a .44 Magnum with the 5.50" barrel and the hardwood grip.
My choice is limited to these two guns. I want this to be my backwoods gun for both the Southeast, where I live, and the times I spend camping or hiking in upper Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho ( Which, I am sure has much larger, dangerous animals ). My choices of ammunition used in these areas would be Buffalo Bore, Grizzly Cartridge, Double Tap, or Cor-Bon. None of the generic stuff. Which one would ya'll choose and why? Thanks
__________________
"My plea is that we stop seeking out the storm and enjoy more fully sunlight. I am suggesting that as we go through life we accentuate the positive. I am asking that we look a little deeper for the good, that we still our voices of insult and sarcasm, that we more generously compliment and endorse virtue and effort." Gordon B. Hinckley Last edited by Southern Shooter; January 24, 2011 at 04:09 PM. |
January 24, 2011, 11:22 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 91
|
I would get the 5.5 44 mag only for the reason that a handgun with less than a 5.5 inch barrel is not legal to hunt with in WI where I deer hunt.
Either caliber would serve you well Mwal |
January 24, 2011, 11:31 AM | #3 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
.45 Colt - best all around handgun cartridge ever invented. That is why it is so popular and has more history than any other revolver cartridge. Buffalo Bore "Heavy" .45 Colt with LBT bullet will smoke anything you run into.
|
January 24, 2011, 11:50 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
|
I like short barrels and the .45 Colt. No contest.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
January 24, 2011, 12:41 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 140
|
I agree with the votes for 45 Colt. I've shot identical Redhawks with wood vs Hogue grip, and I prefer the Hogue.
The poster above is dead on about the 45 Colt being the best all around handgun cartridge invented. From mild to wild, it can do it all. I might add it can throw heavier, wider bullets with less pressure than a 44 Mag as well. I think the 4.2" barrel would be handy for packing, my Blackhawk is 5.5" and I sometimes wish it were shorter when hiking. Last edited by RyeDaddy; January 24, 2011 at 05:53 PM. |
January 24, 2011, 01:14 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,423
|
If I wasn't going to reload, the 44 Mag. You can get WW or REM loads at Wally or Academy in a pinch. If you get the 45, you will be astounded how easy it is to load and how much performance you can get with minimal charges. Example - my favorite load is a 275gr LFN under 10 grain of Unique for 1060.
|
January 24, 2011, 02:13 PM | #7 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
"Example - my favorite load is a 275gr LFN under 10 grain of Unique for 1060 fps." Exactly, .45 Colt LBT style hard cast bullet with large meplat at moderate velocity with Unique. Will shoot through, on a broadside, most any creature on earth. Just like a little freight train.
|
January 24, 2011, 03:13 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Posts: 1,231
|
I don't reload so for me, the choice is the 5.5 Redhawk which I am actually looking to buy right now since I spend quite a bit of my time in Northern Idaho as well. They simply have some big critters up there you don't want to run into.
|
January 24, 2011, 04:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
|
I have both a .45 Colt in the Blackhawk 4 5/8 barrel and a S&W 629 6" barrel. The .45 sees much more field time. A .45 colt loaded w/ hard cast SWC's is going to penetrate anything in the Southeast. So will the .44 but I like that big 45 bullet. If you handload you can turn the Colt into a screamer, especially with the Ruger. It really comes down to personal preference, they will both do the job just fine.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain |
January 24, 2011, 04:33 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,126
|
The .45 Colt. It will do everything the .44 Mag will do and the shorter barrel is easier to carry.
|
January 24, 2011, 09:25 PM | #11 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
Some people just like more noise and more recoil for no good reason.
|
January 24, 2011, 10:44 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
If you plan to hunt with this, check you local regulations. Some states mandate a minimum barrel length for hunting handguns.
I prefer .45 Colt to .44 Mag. |
January 24, 2011, 11:08 PM | #13 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
The 5.5" will likely be more controllable in rapid fire, and there is that longer sight radius...
My .44 Redhawk is 7.5"; I have found I can actually shoot accurately and quite rapidly in double action, working more toward accuracy than speed. The modified Weaver stance makes control of recoil quite easy with 300-grain hot loads. |
January 25, 2011, 12:26 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2002
Location: Red River Valley of the North
Posts: 203
|
I would measure the cylinder throats on both and purchase the one with proper throats. If both are proper or undersized I'd choose the 45 Colt, as bigger is always better but the difference between the 2 is miminal.
This will get a brawl going http://www.handloads.com/articles/default.asp?id=12 The 44 usually shoots well with just about any type of ammo while the 45 Colt can sometimes be a real pain to find that "right" load for best accuracy but it works for me. I've got a couple revolvers in 45 Colt but the only Redhawk I own is a 5.5" in 44 Magnum (has slightly oversized throats) and it's one great revolver and it shoots 240 to 270 hardcast bullets very well. Last edited by Ole 5 hole group; January 25, 2011 at 12:33 AM. |
January 25, 2011, 07:47 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2007
Posts: 861
|
i did not see any big advantage in ballistics, one over the other. the advantage goes to the 44 mag for availability, cost and power if you're somewhere these boutique ammos are not. so i say 44 mag.
__________________
Waltzes with woofs |
January 25, 2011, 11:57 AM | #16 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Drifting: Why does this "availability" thing keep coming into discussions? Are we all so forgetful that we don't buy before we actually need the ammo? Are we all so forgetful that we'd leave the ammo at home?
There are times when I can't help but feel that if availability is a problem for a shooter, he's too bleeping stupid to be allowed to own a gun. |
January 25, 2011, 01:35 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2007
Location: Palmer Ak
Posts: 319
|
Well Art I'd have to say availability does matter, about a year and a half ago if you ran out of 45 colt ammo here, and didn't reload ,then you were out of ammo period, the 44's may have been in short supply but could still be had.
Having said that ,I have both ,reload for both and see no real advantage either way,I carry the one I like to shoot. Alex |
January 25, 2011, 03:13 PM | #18 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Thanx. Interesting. But, the way my peedunkle little mind works, if I lived in a place where such an ammo shortage could occur, I'd either stay well-stocked-up or take up reloading, even if it were just a Lyman tong tool and a Lee dipper.
A point to ponder, a vignette from history: My grandfather moved to Austin, Texas, in 1922. His bank had no monthly service charge if the account balance was $200. So, his zero point in his check book meant $201 still in the account. Ammo? My zero point would likely be at least a couple of 50-round boxes. |
January 25, 2011, 09:32 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,717
|
I love both of those cartridges and shoot several revolvers in both of them. It's a can't lose decision! I do shoot more .45 Colt than .44 magnum though. Even though my 629 is one of the most accurate revolvers I own, I still love shooting my SA .45's. However, I reload for all of them and can easily make whatever type of load I want. If I didn't reload, I would have to vote for the .44. You can buy different levels of loads for the .45 Colt if you look hard enough. But it's a lot easier to find different .44 mag loads on the shelves.
|
January 26, 2011, 02:20 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: February 1, 2000
Posts: 40
|
Can't get Garrett Hammerheads in .45 colt, so the obvious choice is the .44 magnum.
|
January 26, 2011, 06:39 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
"Can't get Garrett Hammerheads in .45 colt, so the obvious choice is the .44 magnum".
The Buffalo Bore is as good as or better than Garrett. Last edited by Art Eatman; January 26, 2011 at 09:02 PM. Reason: Snark removed. |
January 26, 2011, 09:01 PM | #22 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
This is a hunting forum, not a day-care center. Act like grownups--fake it. Works for me; been doing it for decades.
Absent data, some opinions are not "obvious". |
January 26, 2011, 09:17 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,423
|
Praise be to Art.
|
January 26, 2011, 09:45 PM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: February 1, 2000
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Better top end ammo choices, plus cheaper and more available plinking ammo, plus I prefer the 5.5" barrel are the reasons that I would choose the .44 magnum given the two options above. The .45 Colt would serve his purpose just as well, but I would choose the .44 magnum for the reasons above. |
|
January 26, 2011, 09:53 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 214
|
I own both of those two Redhawk models in those two exact calibers and barrel lengths. I carry the 45 Colt and I highly recommend it. I do reload so that may have a slight impact on caliber. To me a big factor is I would rather carry the shorter lighter gun if you're carrying it any distance. I carry mine in an El Paso Tanker model shoulder holster.
__________________
Outdoor Equipment Outfitter for your outdoor equipment needs www.outdoorequipmentoutfitter.org |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|