|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 3, 2009, 03:30 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 3, 2008
Location: Bridgeport ,connecticut
Posts: 30
|
need if info on the law
what is the law on shooting a dog if it a attack me or my kid???
__________________
THE STREETS DON'T LOVE NO-ONE. THEY'LL REMAIN THE SAME NOW AND THEY'LL BE THE SAME LATER TRUST ME ..... IT IS NOT WORTH ARGUING OVER Last edited by niko4203; March 3, 2009 at 12:33 PM. Reason: lol |
March 3, 2009, 08:21 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 3,943
|
First it would depend most likely on if you have the gun legally in
the location of the attack. then it would depend on a lot of other things... if I was on the Jury, to be honest, it would in the end depend on the dog. I'm getting old and fat but 90% of the dogs out there I can still take care of with one hand.
|
March 3, 2009, 11:45 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0052.htm
This would seem to answer the question - if you can use reasonable force against a person - then Fido would seem to fit under these rules.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
March 7, 2009, 06:02 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2000
Posts: 153
|
This would IMHO come under the Theory of Competing Harms... a basic legal principal...
Theory of competing harms Conduct which the actor believes to be necessary to avoid harm to himself or another is justifiable if the desirability and urgency of avoiding such harm outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the statute defining the offense charged. The desirability and urgency of such conduct may not rest upon considerations pertaining to the morality and advisability of such statute, either in its general or particular application. |
March 7, 2009, 07:25 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
In Ohio if being attacked by dog its legal to shoot it. FYI-Judge will ask "was dog attacking you,your family,guest`s,your pet or any livestock you own"? Ask me how I know. If your answer is 'yes' its legal. If your answer is 'no' get your wallet out. I would check your state and local laws, things may vary.
|
March 8, 2009, 10:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 885
|
When faced w/ this situation, it may well be that you will not be charged w/ anything regarding the dog, however, you may still be charged w/ discharging a firearm within a city(if that is your locality). This was the answer given to me about a situation I was in, in Wyoming.
elkman06
__________________
"The right of the citizens to bear arms in the defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied." Wyoming Constitution Article 1, Sec24 "Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6" |
|
|