The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 29, 2010, 02:28 AM   #1
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,309
Winchester buck (slug) and ball ammo

Have you seen this ammo? I was at Wally World today, and there on a shelf was current Win ammo, consisting of a 1 oz slug, and three 00 buck pellets!

What's the consensus of this load as a combat load? I'll likely buy a box just for the novelty if nothing else, though the concept is interesting.

Seems like I've heard a similar arrangement used by the SAS in Malaysia. Possibly Selous Scouts in South Africa as well.
bamaranger is offline  
Old July 29, 2010, 07:08 AM   #2
Dave McC
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
Buck and Ball loads weren't new when the Continental Army used them. Later, they helped give Bloody Lane at Antietam its name.

Currently, they have little or no advantage over plain old 00.
Dave McC is offline  
Old July 29, 2010, 10:04 AM   #3
Sphawley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 272
This is winchesters PDX1 round. It has 1oz. rifled slug with three 00 pellets in front of this, making for some serious stopping power.

I really like these and they group really well, I put them through my Benelli.
Sphawley is offline  
Old July 29, 2010, 11:33 AM   #4
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
Tried some in a Remington 870 last week.
They pattern in a rough triangle, with the slug striking approximately in the center.
Good to about 25 yards in my gun, as far as keeping all four projectiles inside the edges of a human silhouette.
Beyond that, they spread to the point where one or all of the buck pellets begin to raise the liability of missing the target & striking a bystander if used in a defensive situation.
The slug can obviously carry much farther with reasonable accuracy, but I didn't bother to go beyond 25 with it.
Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 10:23 AM   #5
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,309
buck and ball

My first thought was the .69 cal civil war buck and ball load as well.
bamaranger is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 10:37 AM   #6
Rampant_Colt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,478
marketing 101

Buck n ball is known for erratic, unpredictable patterns, increasing the likelihood for collateral damages.
It offers no advantage over slugs or buckshot that i can see..
__________________
member of an elite paramilitary organization: Eagle Scouts
Rampant_Colt is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 10:54 AM   #7
rantingredneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
They also have a .410 round, I'm assuming targeted at owners of the Taurus Judge, that uses two cylindrical looking "slugs" and BB shot.

More exotic marketing to separate you from your wallet, IMO.

Much like Remington's Ultimate HD loads which are duplex 2x4 or BBx2 loads.

I'll stick with Federal LE12700 flite control 00 buck and Brenneke Slugs thanks.
__________________
NRA Member
NC Hunter's Education Instructor

PCCA Member (What's PCCA you ask? <- Check the link)
rantingredneck is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 01:46 PM   #8
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
I've also tried the .410, in a Marlin levergun.
Not sure the BBs do much.
In the 12 gauge, that combination does put a lot of energy into a target.
Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 02:05 PM   #9
B. Lahey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Not sure the BBs do much.
I read a lengthy shotgun ballistics piece a while back that had some extensive testing (that I unfortunately can not find at the moment). It showed lead BBs to be surprisingly effective. The majority of the pellets penetrated around 12" and the jello looked to be in seriously poor condition after the test shot.

Never would have guessed it, but it seems to be at least a non-bonkers choice.

Anyone know where the referenced article was posted? I think it was on a shotgun forum, but there are a million of those...
__________________
"A human being is primarily a bag for putting food into; the other functions and faculties may be more godlike, but in point of time they come afterwards."
-George Orwell
B. Lahey is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 04:05 PM   #10
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
The 12 BBs are copperplated, I didn't try to determine if they're traditional steel BBs (looked about the same size) or lead under the plating.
They tend to spread much faster than 000 buck, about three times as much at 25 yards as the buck, and I'd consider that load a close range proposition.
It also uses three disks.

It's mentioned briefly in an article in the current Gun World.

Denis
DPris is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 04:10 PM   #11
rantingredneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
That's the point that most folks miss in the great and ongoing bird v. buck debate. Range matters.

At contact distance anything out of a 12 ga. is likely to stop the aggressor, but as range moves from feet to yards bigger shot shines.
__________________
NRA Member
NC Hunter's Education Instructor

PCCA Member (What's PCCA you ask? <- Check the link)
rantingredneck is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 05:26 PM   #12
Dave McC
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
At contact distance, a load of breath mints would be devastating. But pellets without much sectional density and weight lose energy very fast,even within a few feet of the muzzle. Skeet loads of 9s may act like giant Glaser Safety Slugs while still in the wad, but at 15 yards there's better choices.

Since we cannot predict the range or conditions of our next firefight,t'is best to stick to BIG pellets and of course,get lots of practice.

As to the load mentioned by the OP, I can not see any situation where this would be an improvement over big buck shot.
Dave McC is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 05:28 PM   #13
DPris
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
Penetration.
Denis
DPris is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04894 seconds with 8 queries