June 9, 2010, 09:08 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
Brand Names
Just curious what manufactures you guys would recommend as "good quality".
At this time, I only own one black powder gun, which is made by Uberti. Though I've been somewhat disappointed in the so-called "drop-in" replacement parts (which may not even be made by Uberti), I would consider the overall quality of this gun VERY good. So what about other manufactures? ... Pietta? Palmetto? CVA? Others? Which would you guys recommend as "good quality" and which would you recommend staying away from? Thanks for the help. |
June 9, 2010, 09:45 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
I've had good and bad Piettas and Ubertis. Palmetto does not have a good reputation but I had a decent Palmetto .31. I've never seen a bad Ruger Old Army - they're built like tanks, even if they're not historically accurate to anything but themselves. I like used guns - most of the bugs have been worked out and the prices are alot lower. If I buy a new gun with a small to medium problem, I try to work through it because you could return that gun for a new one and end up with worse problems. The devil you know...
Plus, by working on the guns, you get to know them. I have two 3rd Generation Colt Signature Series revolvers and I do not think you will find any gun, anywhere, better than either of these. Fit, finish, functionality are just about perfect. And they look great. I have a few originals which are in a class of their own. It's a great obsession...I mean sport. |
June 9, 2010, 11:11 PM | #3 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
And I believe CVA's are mostly entry level. At least from those I've seen. Can anyone tell me if a Pietta is similar to Urberti in quality? |
|
June 9, 2010, 11:59 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,281
|
I think that ubertis are better quality than pietta.
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people. |
June 10, 2010, 02:44 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
|
Euroarms are good quality guns!
|
June 10, 2010, 05:16 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 14, 2010
Location: camden maine
Posts: 137
|
uberti is way better than pietta... just look at how many pietta's are getting returned vrs ubertis...
__________________
Guns don't kill people, jealous husbands that come home from work early kill people |
June 10, 2010, 07:05 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
My opinion, worth exactly twice what you paid for it:
In descending order of 'quality'... Ruger Feinwerkbau US Firearms Colt 2nd Generation Colt 3rd Generation Fabriques d’Armes Unies de Liège Pedersoli Uberti Euroarms/Armi San Paolo Peitta Armi San Marco . . . . Palmetto The top 7 are so close in quality it's probably silly to attempt to rank them, but an opinion is just an opinion anyway. By the way, I own, or have owned at least one example (and usually more than one) of each of the above manufacturer's bp revolvers with the exception of USFA and Feinwerkbau. For those two I'm relying on others' opinions. |
June 10, 2010, 08:01 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
I've seen good and bad examples from all manufacturers with one exception, Ruger. Never seen a poorly made Ruger, maybe a stiff trigger or two.
Uberti makes a fine Colt Dragoon, but I prefer the Pietta holster frame Colts and Remingtons over the Uberti. Early ASM could be short on fit and finish but toward the end of their production they made a very nice pistol, to bad they stopped. Quote:
|
|
June 10, 2010, 08:09 AM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
This is good stuff.
Thanks for all the feedback. |
June 10, 2010, 09:48 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 936
|
A lot of times you get what you paid for. Oddly (or not) my rankings match that concept. From personal experience and ownership:
1. Ruger 2. Uberti 3. Pietta Ruger is way ahead of the other two. Uberti finish is much nicer than Pietta. Your mileage may vary. |
June 10, 2010, 04:48 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
Quote:
|
|
June 10, 2010, 06:12 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2007
Posts: 712
|
robhof
I have a ROA and a 31 San Marco; both bought used, the Ruger looked new and unfired and shoots great and as said above"built like a tank", the San Marco also had little use, but required much work to get it in good shooting condition. I have handled and shot both Pieta and Uberti and they're good guns, but you do get what you pay for.
|
June 10, 2010, 09:31 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
"That's because more Pietta's are bought"
That's because Pietta's are cheaper. People just getting into BP guns don't usually go to the more expensive copies. They just get one of the cheaper ones from Cabelas. That's what I did 15 years ago when I got into BP. After 3 different Piettas crapped out on me in about 5 years I went with the more expensive Ubertis and have never had but one problem with any of them. I have owned 8 Piettas but still own 2, and one is broken. Including non BP guns, I have 12 Ubertis. I raise cattle in the "hills of West Virginia" and my Ubertis are my "FARM GUNS". BP and cartridge "cowboy" guns. I hunt with them, I have put down injured cows with them, killed coyotes with them. I have worn them in the worst weather possible, rain, snow, heat,mud, you name it. I have never had a problem with any of them. My Piettas broke down just doing Civil War reenactments once a month. I know some people have Piettas that have been going for 20 years without a problem. I guess EVERY time I ordered a Pietta I just got the crappy one of the bunch. The only "problem" I had with a Uberti was in a 51 navy copy. The day after I got it the hand spring broke. I got a new spring and have not had another problem with it since. I have to say in MY OPINION and experience, Uberti beats the pi$$ out of Pietta. Others feel differently. I don't know about Rugers. Hope I didn't ruffle any feathers. Last edited by MJN77; June 10, 2010 at 11:18 PM. |
June 10, 2010, 09:53 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
I don't know, Uberti must have accumulated enough return guns to sell a bunch to Midway as refurbished guns. My post on it is here: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=411732
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
June 10, 2010, 10:52 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Or they are returned to Midway and Midway refurbished them. Either way, how many threads are there about returning a Pietta to Cabelas because of problems? I know I have read a lot of them. When I am at Cabelas, I see alot of returned revolvers in the bargin cave. Someone said read the reviews on Cabela's site. How many bad comments do you think they want on their site?( not just Cabela's but any site with reviews) Too many bad reviews is bad for business. I am not saying there are not reliable Pietta revolvers out there. In fact I would like to have a Great Western II from EMF. I have just never had a "good" Pietta in my experience.
Last edited by MJN77; June 10, 2010 at 10:58 PM. |
June 11, 2010, 12:35 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: June 8, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
__________________
For a Complete Directory of Black Powder Specialty Forums, Please Visit BlackPowderSmoke.com |
|
June 11, 2010, 01:07 PM | #17 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
Regardless, a quick Google search will reveal alot of bad reviews for whoever makes the guns with their name on them. |
|
June 11, 2010, 01:45 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
There is another brand you might come across - High Standard. I have one, a brass framed Griswold & Gunnison .36. I think "madcratebuilder" has all the others that were ever made. I'm pretty sure they're Uberti parts, but they don't have any Italian markings at all. Nice guns.
I had an Armi San Marco Dragoon and it was a good shooter. I recently bought a Pietta "Lawman", an 1860 .44 with the fluted cylinder and the white grips. It was considered used but it was unfired. It is a very well made gun - fit and finish are great. The first BP gun I ever owned is a regular Pietta 1860 .44, and its action is as smooth as any gun I've ever owned. You cannot buy a BP revolver, other than a Ruger, and expect it to be as trouble free as a modern gun. Half the fun is working on them (as long as the problems are minor). Last edited by pohill; June 12, 2010 at 07:49 PM. |
June 11, 2010, 07:59 PM | #19 | |
Member
Join Date: June 8, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
__________________
For a Complete Directory of Black Powder Specialty Forums, Please Visit BlackPowderSmoke.com |
|
June 12, 2010, 07:05 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Quote:
High Standard did much the same as Colt did with the second gens. HS bought barrels, cylinders and grip frames from Uberti. Made their own frames, all small parts and grip panels. What's unique about the HS is there are no color case parts, everything is blued. The blue is a very dark and deep black finish like top of the line S&W. They made a brass frame Schneider & Glassick, a brass frame Griswold & Gunnison(two version). A steel frame Leech & Rigdon. You would be hard pressed to find a better made version of these revolvers. Most of the HS records were lost in a fire so exact numbers are a guess, but about 1000 of each of the cased sets were made. There were four cased sets, I have three of them, two with matched serial numbers. |
|
June 12, 2010, 08:08 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 3, 2007
Location: Wild Western Illinois
Posts: 559
|
I have one Pedersoli. Very nice quality of wood and metal finish. Shoots great (once I went to the Black Powder forum and found guidance).
I have one Pietta. It came with tool marks about ten/fifteen years ago. I understand that their quality has gone up since then. Shoots fine, though, no timing issues. I had one Armi San Marco. A piece of You-Know-What. I have three Uberti's and no complaints about them whatsoever. Unlike some, I really do like the finish on the grips. I have one Jukar, and it is a fun gun, once I figured out the hammer was not hitting the nipple squarely enough to fire the cap. It was a kit. You can find my photos of it on this and THR pages. I would not hesitate to buy Uberti or Pedersoli. I have a friend who has a Rogers & Spencer by Euroarms. It is also a nicely made gun. The Doc is out now.
__________________
General McAuliffe said it best "Nuts." |
June 12, 2010, 09:32 AM | #22 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 2, 2006
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
There is no such thing as "drop-in" parts as it appears that no two (even if it's the same model made by the same manufacture) are exactly the same. It's almost as if each handgun is custom made. |
|
June 12, 2010, 10:04 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: on a hill in West Virginia
Posts: 789
|
Originals were the same way.
|
June 12, 2010, 10:26 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
The biggest probem I've had with the repro Colt open tops is a loose barrel/frame connection. Once the wedge gets worn a little, or the exit slot metal gets stretched, it throws everything off. I have an original Colt 1851 .36 made in 1862, and it's still tight at that connection. The difference is the wedge screw (and maybe the metal?). Colt intended the wedge screw to act as a depth set for the wedge to keep the connection tight -the head of the wedge screw in this gun is larger and actually contacts the slot in the wedge and does act as a set. At some point the wedge would have to be replaced, but until then the screw works well. I actually put a screw with an oversized head on my Pietta 1860 .44 and it tightened the connection up.
Beyond the history, the smoke, the BOOM, it's the minor repairs that make these guns interesting, and worth keeping as opposed to sending them back for a gun with new problems. That's why I like used guns. |
|
|