|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 1, 2010, 02:21 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2007
Location: Shawnee, Ok.
Posts: 155
|
.308 for 300 yds
Beautiful LongRifles, Inc. I would be lucky to see a sheet of plywood at a 1,000 yards with eyes only, let alone hit it.
|
February 1, 2010, 09:02 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 526
|
Coupla thoughts:
1) Seems like there are some people who will never believe until they see it done live-and-in-person with their own eyes; maybe not even then 2) Some people consistently over-rate their abilities (are average or below-average shooters and don't know it) 3) The people who over-rate their abilities are more numerous than those who actually have above-average abilities and are honest about their achievements 4) Due to point # 3, it becomes too easy to mistake a person from group # 3 with someone from group # 2 5) This leads to the issue mentioned in point # 1
__________________
You only take one shot at a time - make it count. |
February 1, 2010, 10:13 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2000
Location: Colombia, SC
Posts: 745
|
Longrifles, for some of these shooters long range is 100 yards!
I have shot with some of the best shooters out there when I lived in AZ, and I know what these people are capable of, it is just mind boggling to see how easy they shoot a clean at 1000 yards while you struggle not to shoot anything worse than an 8.. My claim to fame is that 8 years ago I did beat 28 out of 30 Marine shooters with M14's in a 1000 yard service rifle match (ran by Mid) shooting my stock Garand with Var barrel. That included shooting 2 misses when we had a 180 degree wind change that took me 10 minutes of windage to get back on target. These days I don't think I could see the targets any more.
__________________
I don't have time for busy people |
February 1, 2010, 03:20 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 11, 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 134
|
Chad, those are beautiful rifles!
|
February 4, 2010, 09:54 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 31
|
Under 2" is good. 1 MOA would be 3" it is ok but not match quality. 1/2 MOA or better for matches.
__________________
A wise man knows which hill to die upon. |
February 4, 2010, 12:14 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: May 27, 2002
Location: East TX
Posts: 78
|
3" is good. Any less than that has to be better than good.
|
February 5, 2010, 12:30 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 938
|
Lets just say I am humbled by what some can do with an "camera obscura" ( aka aperture sights. I need me one of those.
|
February 5, 2010, 09:30 PM | #33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2010
Location: High Springs, FL
Posts: 8
|
"what would be considered a good grouping at 300 Yards using a bipod setup"?
Patrol, single file.
__________________
" Don't worry, they couldn't hit elephants at this dis...." NRA Life Member |
February 6, 2010, 09:53 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
bipod , good group size , long range , target |
|
|