The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 27, 2018, 11:43 AM   #1
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
NRA being investigated

I'm not sure if this qualifies as being firearms related, so no worries on my part if the mods decide it isn't. With it being on the front line in the gun rights debate, I thought this might be interesting for us to discuss. The NRA is being investigated for how it uses money it receives from foreign entities.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/27/59727...-election-work
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 11:48 AM   #2
RC20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
I never knew it received any money from foreign entities .
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not
RC20 is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 11:49 AM   #3
BarryLee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
Well, in this era of 140-character news blurbs on social media I suspect just the headline isn’t good for us. Like a lot of things there probably is little or anything to it, but most folks will never read any in-depth reporting or the final resolution just the initial accusation.
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.
- Milton Friedman
BarryLee is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 12:02 PM   #4
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,451
In the link is a Ron Elving video. It's not a bad synopsis.

The written article is less good, and is at least partly the product of Peter Overby. I've listened to NPR for four decades, and acknowledge Overby's efficacy as a propagandist. NPR presents Overby as something like a journalist, but he really isn't that.

Last edited by zukiphile; March 27, 2018 at 12:22 PM.
zukiphile is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 12:17 PM   #5
Erno86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,739
The NRA has been playing the con game for years --- No doubt...they've become quite good at it.
__________________
That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."

--- George Orwell
Erno86 is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 01:19 PM   #6
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC20
I never knew it received any money from foreign entities .
Keep in mind that several prominent gunmakers are foreign-owned, although they may have substantial U.S. operations. Glock, HK, and FNH spring to mind.

At issue is who else the NRA may have taken money from.

This is not the first time that the organization's (overly intense IMHO) focus on fundraising has wound up biting it on the posterior.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak
carguychris is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 03:37 PM   #7
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erno86
The NRA has been playing the con game for years --- No doubt...they've become quite good at it.
What con game might that be?

As for the news, there are numerous foreign or foreign-owned gun manufacturers as carguychris noted. If they buy a booth at the annual NRA meeting to promote their wares, the NRA arguably took money from a foreign entity.

If they sponsor an NRA competition, same deal.

The NRA charter is fairly particular that member dues cannot be spent on lobbying. I’d have to find the charter and look at it; but I imagine there are similar restrictions on these types of funds.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 06:03 PM   #8
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
Let's stick to facts. It is an empirical question as to whether X or Y happened. We can discuss it factually. Just saying the NRA is good or bad without evidence, isn't worth our time.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 07:20 PM   #9
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
I am sure there are hundreds of foreign individuals who are NRA members along with the foreign companies with interests to protect.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 07:54 PM   #10
WyMark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 647
The Congressional, FEC and FBI investigations are concerned with the NRA's relationship with and contributions from a Russian banker and close Putin ally, not foreign corporations or gun companies. And specifically whether any of that Russian money made up any part of the $30 million that the NRA donated to the Trump campaign.

Since foreign contributions to US elections are illegal, running it through a willing US organization like the NRA or it's PAC would be a fairly simple way to launder it.
WyMark is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 08:37 PM   #11
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartholomew Roberts
The NRA charter is fairly particular that member dues cannot be spent on lobbying. I’d have to find the charter and look at it; but I imagine there are similar restrictions on these types of funds.
My understanding is that the NRA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and that, as such, they can't spend any money on lobbying, regardless of the source. That's why they have the NRA-ILA -- that's the lobbying arm. Which is why, after the Parkland shooting, I sent a check to the NRA-ILA.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 27, 2018, 10:24 PM   #12
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
NRA is a 501(c)(4) non-profit, which is why contributions to NRA are not tax deductible. The NRA Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit. (c)(4) non-profits are allowed to engage in lobbying with some restrictions.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 28, 2018, 04:46 AM   #13
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
Quote:
The Congressional, FEC and FBI investigations are concerned with the NRA's relationship with and contributions from a Russian banker and close Putin ally, not foreign corporations or gun companies. And specifically whether any of that Russian money made up any part of the $30 million that the NRA donated to the Trump campaign.

Since foreign contributions to US elections are illegal, running it through a willing US organization like the NRA or it's PAC would be a fairly simple way to launder it.
Exactly. Also at issue is that the NRA moves money between accounts, thereby making it difficult to know if money is being used in ways that go against campaign finance laws. The organization could be in some trouble over this.
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 28, 2018, 08:21 AM   #14
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartholomew Roberts
NRA is a 501(c)(4) non-profit, which is why contributions to NRA are not tax deductible. The NRA Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit. (c)(4) non-profits are allowed to engage in lobbying with some restrictions.
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware of the distinction.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 28, 2018, 09:52 AM   #15
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
[quote]The organization could be in some trouble over this.[quote]

The NRA was audited by the IRS continuously for all eight years of the Clinton Administration. So, I’m doubtful the NRA suddenly decided to break campaign finance laws during an Obama Administration, with a Clinton Administration looking like a high future probability. The NRA is many things; but they are consistently plodding, slow, and overcautious.

Not to mention the NRA still has a few prominent Democrats on the board or actively engaged behind the scenes.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 30, 2018, 08:38 PM   #16
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
I was hoping to hear more about this on NPR this week, but nothing new has been aired. I've been getting home late from work, so I haven't had the time to research the issue any more.

BartR, maybe I'm just tired right now, but I'm not sure what IRS audits back in the Clinton years and Dems being on the board have to do with what's being investigated now. Can you clarify for me?
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 30, 2018, 09:04 PM   #17
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
No, I cannot. If you are incapable of making that inference I do not know any simpler or more obvious way to describe it.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old March 30, 2018, 09:24 PM   #18
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
Ok.
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 30, 2018, 10:07 PM   #19
In The Ten Ring
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2018
Posts: 380
I enjoy listening to NPR when driving, but let's define "enjoy" more clearly.

I enjoy some of their stories, "BBC News" or whatever.

Their domestic stories I enjoy keeping me awake due to their obvious bias.
In The Ten Ring is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 06:22 AM   #20
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
NPR is great. Morning Edition and All Things Considered are very informative. They always present at least two sides to the news stories. What some of the other programs do is present one side one day and present the other the next, so you have to be a regular listener to get both sides. I've been waiting to hear a more in-depth report on this investigation of the NRA but there hasn't been anything more on it. I guess I will have to do a search on their website when I get home from work later on today. Maybe they have done more reporting on it and I just missed it for some reason. I'm no fan of the NRA, but I know that them getting caught with their pants down over the past election would do absolutely nothing to help with the PR problems we're dealing with right now.
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 07:07 AM   #21
turkeestalker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
Quote:
I'm no fan of the NRA, but I know that them getting caught with their pants down over the past election would do absolutely nothing to help with the PR problems we're dealing with right now.
So when you say "we're", the "we" that you're referencing are those who are not fans of the NRA?
That's a pretty predictable group, but hey... this could be HUGE!
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter!
turkeestalker is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 07:12 AM   #22
SonOfScubaDiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2017
Posts: 391
Quote:
So when you say "we're", the "we" that you're referencing are those who are not fans of the NRA?
That's a pretty predictable group, but hey... this could be HUGE!
We as in gun owners. In case you haven't noticed, we (as in gun owners, since you apparently need clarification on that) are getting quite a bit of bad press lately.
SonOfScubaDiver is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 07:25 AM   #23
turkeestalker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2015
Location: Cottleville, Missouri
Posts: 1,115
Oh I see! Thanks for the clarification.
__________________
Vegetarian... primitive word for lousy hunter!
turkeestalker is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 11:52 AM   #24
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
A reminder - we don't do lefty-righty or general Presidential politics.

Such are deleted
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old March 31, 2018, 05:12 PM   #25
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
Well, this will certainly make for an interesting intersection of 1A protections, 2A politics, and campaign financing in the days where corporations are people, too.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07730 seconds with 8 queries