|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 21, 2011, 06:38 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 567
|
Video - Shooting the .44 Starr Army Revolver
This is a change from the Colts and Remingtons. Starrs were the third most issued revolvers in the Union Army.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lU5CuFdgRoA |
September 21, 2011, 07:42 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 8, 2009
Posts: 374
|
Mike.
I really liked this video. It was something you don't see every day! The only criticism is the audio levels keep changing between your scenes. You have to work on that. All in all though, I give it 4/5 'Stars'. Pun intended! |
September 21, 2011, 07:49 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 3, 2011
Location: Poteet, Texas
Posts: 959
|
What percentage of handguns used in the War of Northern Aggression were 'other than' Colts, Remingtons, & S&Ws? Anyone know?
|
September 21, 2011, 08:21 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: September 4, 2011
Posts: 17
|
Excellent. I was just looking at pictures of these and reading about them the other day. Interesting looking and functioning handgun. I think I would like to have a replica of one. Anyone know who manufactures them now?
|
September 22, 2011, 08:54 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
|
Pietta makes replica Starrs. Polish up your credit card - they're a little spendy.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae |
September 22, 2011, 09:17 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 8, 2009
Posts: 374
|
I already priced it at Cabelas...$499.99
|
September 22, 2011, 09:55 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Location: Sarasota (sort of) Florida
Posts: 1,296
|
LeMats are more fun
AFS
__________________
'Qui tacet consentit': To remain silent is to consent. |
September 22, 2011, 09:56 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
Mike Cumpston and Johnny Bates reviewed the Pietta Starr SA in their second book, Percussion Revolvers, A Guide to Their History, Performance and Use, which may still be available on amazon.com. Don't confuse this with their first book, Percussion Pistols and Revolvers, History, Performance and Practical Use, which does not cover the Starr.
The title of the chapter gives a clue as to their opinion of the gun: "Treason With a Hair Trigger: The Starr Revolver". I own one, and it's my least favorite percussion revolver; in fact, it's probably my least favorite gun overall. It's poorly balanced, does not point well and the grips are probably the most awkward of any gun I own; obviously I strongly disagree with Mr. B on that, but those are personal likes and dislikes. In addition, it's difficult to disassemble and clean in my opinion, so there's little about this gun we can agree on. How much of this is due to Pietta's execution of the design, as opposed to the design itself, I can't say. My main problem is removal of the pin to open the frame. On my gun, and on Cumpton's also, this pin is a very poor fit and almost requires a wrench to loosen and tighten. In addition, once the pin is finally out it takes a good deal of effort to open the frame as it does not fit well. I have similar issues with removing the screws and disassembling the interior (yes, I have gunsmith's screwdrivers). On the good side, it's reasonably accurate to point of aim and handles heavy loads well, with little felt recoil. |
September 22, 2011, 11:09 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 567
|
Thanks for the feedback Mykeal. It looks like you and Mr. Cumpston have Starrs that perform quite a bit differently than mine. The trigger pull weight on my single action Starr is four pounds, even. Measured on my RCBS gauge.
As you can see in the video, the take-down screw on mine comes out easily and the action breaks open with little effort. The cylinder just about drops out. I find it is pretty easy to work on, though very different than a Colt, so it takes some getting used to. For me it points well, but that's a personal thing. Sorry you got a lemon. |
September 22, 2011, 11:12 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 567
|
BTW, I'll be doing a LeMat video before too long.
|
September 24, 2011, 12:43 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2011
Posts: 156
|
seems i'm falling behind, meant to watch your 1851 video but my internet connection wouldn't allow it. and now this video too, oh no
i picked up a copy of Guns of the Old West about two weeks ago and read the article about the Starr, i'd heard of them before but didn't know they were made in single action also, piqued my interest. and now a video!? it must be my birthday! Quote:
|
|
October 21, 2011, 08:07 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Nice vid duelist. You sure don't see the Starr's in action very often. I have a complaint with my SA Starr, it well lock up some times when placed in half cock for loading. I quickly learned it needed a different loading procedure, no problems since then.
There was the same love-hate relationship back in the day with these, owners either loved them or hated them. After some light honing to the action both mine are smooth, reliable shooters. I picked these up from a pawn shop that had listed them on GB. Both were miss boxed and sold for .45 cents on the dollar. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|