The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 16, 2018, 09:16 AM   #1
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,456
Powder for .308

Loading 150-165 hunting bullets, and I have a good load with Re-15. What experience do you have (good or bad) with: TAC (Nosler likes it), CFE223 (Hornady likes it) and IMR-4320. I have all of those, but no Varget. If Varget is the bee's knees, then I might have to buy some, but not just now.

IMR-4320 is in there because I have an 8-lb jug. When powder was scarce, I went looking for a substitute for Re-15 for .300 Savage and got a good price on it. It does OK in the Savage, but the shortage is over (for now). It does OK in a number of rounds, actually.

So, what say you?
ligonierbill is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 09:55 AM   #2
Charlie98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Location: Great state of Texas
Posts: 1,077
Depends on the barrel length... but shorter barrels in .308 get IMR3031, longer barrels, say 20" and up, get IMR4064, particularly in that bullet weight range.
__________________
_______________

"I have this pistol pointed at your heart!"
"That is my least vulnerable spot."
Charlie98 is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 10:56 AM   #3
OzeanJaeger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2014
Posts: 301
I think Varget is the bees-knees. I can't give you a scientific reason why, but I seem to be able to tune the cartridges and find the sweet spots more easily, and I've never been stumped or dead ended with it (I have with a lot of other powders).

Out of the ones you list I like 3420. I try to stay as close to 100% capacity as possible, and preferably at a slightly compressed load. There are probably people who disagree with me, but I think it offers a consistency that is difficult to replicate with the powder sloshing around in empty case space.

I'd start working it right below a full case and go up from there.
OzeanJaeger is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 11:04 AM   #4
Wendyj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2015
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,372
I would agree with above post. Varget has always done best for me. I couldn't find any 3-4 years ago when I started reloading and used 4064 and occasionally will still try some but keep all the Varget I can get my hands on.
__________________
God is NOT dead!!!!
Wendyj is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 11:18 AM   #5
Dufus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
You were asking about IMR4320. I think it is the hidden gold in a 308 Win.

Excellent powder in that cartridge and as good as any other.

Since you have it on hand, dont' let it sit on the shelf. Use it and you will be very surprised.
Dufus is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 12:44 PM   #6
hounddawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
What Dufus said. I am a Varget fan myself because I can load anything from a .204 to a .308 with it but if I had several pounds of 4320 sitting on the shelf that is what I would be loading
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek

Last edited by hounddawg; February 16, 2018 at 03:08 PM.
hounddawg is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 01:29 PM   #7
Sure Shot Mc Gee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
Been so long that I don't recall if I use 4320 or not. Although I know I have near a pound of here. Don't shoot a 308. Found no need to own one since I own 2 _Savage 99 300's. Savage 300's aren't as fast in their get-go as the 308 is. But unlike the 308? I can tell when a deer is hammered hard by my 300. Especially handy when the animal where-with-all to get itself back into the woods after being targeted on a hay field.
Something I cant (figure out) with a 308 hit.
Given some extra thought. I think way back when I reloaded that last box of 300's. >4895<was used for the purpose. And that powder may be a good'in for a 308's home reloading
Sure Shot Mc Gee is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 01:51 PM   #8
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
There is no one powder for .308. Varget, IMR4064 and 4320 are very, very close to the same velocities and pressures using a 168. Slightly more powder(like a couple grains) for similar velocities with a 150 too. So it really doesn't make a lot of difference. It'll be up to your rifle to tell you what powder it prefers.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 01:57 PM   #9
Don Fischer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
Over the years I've used several different powder's. H335, BLC/2, H4895, IMR 4350 and W748. Actually I've never found a powder that wouldn't shoot well in my old 308!
Don Fischer is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 04:36 PM   #10
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
Quote:
Depends on the barrel length... but shorter barrels in .308 get IMR3031, longer barrels, say 20" and up, get IMR4064, particularly in that bullet weight range.
Barrel length has nothing to do with anything. The fastest and most accurate load from a 26" barrel will also be the fastest and most accurate from a 16" barrel. Even the slowest burning powders burn up within just a few inches. The only way a faster powder might help is if you are shooting 308 in a pistol length barrel.

Varget is my go-to powder, but RL15 is probably just as good. I see more recommendations for IMR4064 as being the most accurate powder than all others combined. I've used all 3 with pretty much equal accuracy and velocity.

I prefer Varget or RL15 because they are more stable in a wide range of temperatures.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 04:47 PM   #11
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Just shoot the RL15 and be happy.
std7mag is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 04:51 PM   #12
Average Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,325
I use W748 in both .308 and .223. Works well, when I asked my reloading supplier about maybe trying TAC, he laughed at me....
Average Joe is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 04:54 PM   #13
OzeanJaeger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2014
Posts: 301
Wow. Those are wide ranging answers, but I pretty much agree with all of them.
T O'heir is right. They're all pretty close on paper, but the reason they seem to react differently in different rifles remains a mystery.
OzeanJaeger is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 05:04 PM   #14
Learjett
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2014
Posts: 6
I use a variety of powders in my long range Remington. I like varget a lot buy my rifle shoots the best with IMR 4064, just can't beat it. My rifle is a heavy barrel 26" with a 1-12 twist. I wish it was a little faster but I can easily stabilize Serria Match Kings to 175 grains at long range.
Learjett is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 09:13 PM   #15
Whistlebritches
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2017
Location: Northwest Texas
Posts: 107
I use CFE 223 for 150-165 grainers........4064 for 180 gr and up.Excellent velocity/accuracy with the CFE 223.
Whistlebritches is offline  
Old February 16, 2018, 09:23 PM   #16
zipspyder
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
I use the tried and true BL/C2 for my .308 and 303. But I'm old school.
zipspyder is offline  
Old February 17, 2018, 05:08 AM   #17
NWPilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
BLC-2 and CFE223 for .308. I find they work well for a range of bullet weights. I also like Varget, but it is the first to disappear off the shelves so I had to explore others and really like these two. Though I have not shot it, just from the powder burn rate scale, RL15 ought to be pretty good.
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition."
- James Madison
NWPilgrim is offline  
Old February 17, 2018, 11:25 AM   #18
Charlie98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Location: Great state of Texas
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Barrel length has nothing to do with anything. The fastest and most accurate load from a 26" barrel will also be the fastest and most accurate from a 16" barrel. Even the slowest burning powders burn up within just a few inches.
Actually, it does. I'm not going to derail the OP's thread with a debate on it. You believe what you believe, and I'll do the same, based on my own experience.
__________________
_______________

"I have this pistol pointed at your heart!"
"That is my least vulnerable spot."
Charlie98 is offline  
Old February 18, 2018, 06:39 PM   #19
HankC1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 531
Quote:
I use the tried and true BL/C2 for my .308 and 303.
Do you need magnum primer in winter for BLC2?
HankC1 is offline  
Old February 18, 2018, 07:17 PM   #20
zipspyder
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
Quote:
Do you need magnum primer in winter for BLC2?
I use magnum primers in all my .308/.303 reloads. That's all I could get locally at the time. Seem to work good in all temps.
zipspyder is offline  
Old February 18, 2018, 11:10 PM   #21
Fusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2010
Posts: 429
Like several others others, I love Varget. That said, if I had other powders on hand, but no Varget, I wouldn't hesitate to try to work up a load with them first.
Fusion is offline  
Old February 18, 2018, 11:26 PM   #22
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
Do you need magnum primer in winter for BLC2?
Yes. BLC2 is a ball propellant used in the USGI 7.62 round and military primers are magnum. Summer, winter, no matter. Use the magnum primers. Ball powders have a deterrent coating, and less space for the flame to move around, so they can be harder to ignite consistently. I understand that as the case volume/powder stack, increases, and powder speed decreases the benefits of magnum primers are greater. They will go bang with regular primers.
Taken to an extreme, I have loaded 308 full of WC872 (VERY slow), and even with magnum primers, it leaves a trail of unburned granules down the bore.
Extruded powders like 4895, 4064, Varget, etc, are easier to ignite with regular primers. Usually these extruded powders are treated to have some degree of temperature insensitivity.

I use CCI #34 mil spec primers for 308.
"Specifications and Features:
Mil Spec Sensitivity
Non-Corrosive
Initiator mixed for ball powder
Easy to seat"

Back to OP's question, see this link to Hodgdon's burn rate chart and powders #80 to #115 (I have used data for many from #83 to #106) is the general range of appropriate powers for 7.62/308. ALWAYS consult published reloading data. Burn rate charts are NOT reloading data.
https://www.hodgdon.com/wp-content/u...rate-color.pdf
__________________
............

Last edited by Marco Califo; February 18, 2018 at 11:45 PM. Reason: #34s, burn rate chart link
Marco Califo is offline  
Old February 19, 2018, 12:53 AM   #23
jamaica
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2006
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 705
IMR 4320 should do nicely if you already have some. Give it a whirl.
jamaica is offline  
Old February 19, 2018, 08:52 AM   #24
zipspyder
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2017
Posts: 429
Thanks for the info Marco. Nice to know I was using the correct ones.
zipspyder is offline  
Old February 19, 2018, 11:08 AM   #25
Rimfire5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 923
For two of my 308s, the best powders are IMR 4064, H4895 and N140 in that order.
For the third .308, the best powders are N140, H4895 and RL-15 in that order.
Each of the rifles have shot over 1000 groups with lots of powders and lots of bullet weights.
The third rifle has been retired after well over 6500 rounds due to excessive throat erosion.

Shooting conditions make a difference and I am a lot better shooter now and the third rifle is older and many of the groups were shot without the changes in my technique so I don't trust the data as much.
Rimfire5 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06579 seconds with 10 queries