The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 23, 2017, 03:18 PM   #1
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
357 Ring Of Fire Update

Hi guys,
Here's the latest performance data for the 357 Ring Of Fire cartridges.
The starting pressures are 37,000 PSI, and the maximum pressures are
45,000 PSI. The C.O.A.L has been reduced to 1.280 to accommodate a wider range of pistol magazines and hopefully appeal to a larger group.
125 gr. Speer JHP, JSP
POWER PISTOL 1475-1581
140 gr. Sierra JHP
POWER PISTOL 1347-1441
147 gr. Magnus JHP
POWER PISTOL 1257-1345
158 gr. Speer DCSP
POWER PISTOL 1242-1327
170 gr. Speer DCSP, GDSP
POWER PISTOL 1163-1243
200 gr. Magnus LRN
POWER PISTOL 917-976*
* Still developing charges for a 200 grain bullet which is shorter than the LRN...
The guys at Carolina Arms Group are very interested in adding my cartridge to their line!
I am currently in negotiations with Kart Barrels to have barrels made for 1911's by these fine folks, in addition to BarSto!
Now...for those of you partial to
Norma R123 powder...
I showed my cartridge performance estimates to the North American Sales manager, when I went to Atlanta, for the NRA Annual Meeting in late April.
He was so impressed with the projections using the Norma R123 powder, he will send me some to verify ballistics. Oh, by the way, this powder will have starting velocities at 37k psi, ABOVE MAXIMUM velocities of currently made powders! For example:
125 gr. Speer JHP, JSP 1616-1717 fps.
140 gr. Sierra JHP 1484-1575 fps.
147 gr. Hornady XTP 1396-1482 fps.
158 gr. Speer DCSP 1376-1457 fps.
170 gr. Speer DCSP, GDSP 1292-1367 fps.
Those of you who load your own, you can get onboard now! All you need are 9mm dies.
I recommend Carbide dies, and also a factory crimp die with a carbide ring in it, like the Lee Industries die.
Loading data will be supplied with brass.
Accuracy? Well, I fired standing, and was so excited, I was all over...but I dropped to kneeling, and a 5 shot group was 1.5" at 25 yards...minimum acceptable to an old Marine...
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 03:20 PM   #2
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
Sounds fantastic, like a better .357 SIG. I'm looking forward to what comes of this. Hopefully you can eventually get a major manufacturer to bring out a gun in this chambering.
Model12Win is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 03:30 PM   #3
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
All

Oh! We may get Norma R123 powder back when this takes off! Wouldn't that be great?
I'm also trying to get an American company to get onboard this idea. Competition is good right?

We're going to have conversion units and brass from Starline.

Thanks again!
Dave

Last edited by JohnKSa; May 25, 2017 at 11:58 PM. Reason: .
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 03:39 PM   #4
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
All

Yes!
I ran out of room in the first post...
I went to Atlanta for the NRA Annual meeting.
I visited EVERY GUNMAKER there! All were impressed. All have some performance data and contact info...
Yes, Colt, Smith&Wesson, Remington, Armscorp, Rock Island Armory, Sig Sauer, FN, STI and I can't recall who else.
I did share this with Rob Leatham, Jesse James (he's making ammo now!), and even had a nice chat with Wiley Clapp! I met Colorado Buck too! He wants to do some tests with them!!! I'm just waiting for him to get back and make arrangements.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 03:54 PM   #5
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
Whoohoo!!! This is awesome! Hope it kicks off.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 04:01 PM   #6
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
All

Thanks Constantine, Model12Win!

Yes! It's officially kicked off now!

Barrels will be available with standard or personalized serial numbers on the barrel! Match it to your pistol! Make a statement like Ghost Maker? Most anything you like.

The future is NOW!

Last edited by JohnKSa; May 25, 2017 at 11:56 PM. Reason: .
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 08:54 PM   #7
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,150
Congratulations Dave, your perseverance looks like it's going to pay off. You've been a gentleman and have withstood some pretty severe criticism to get where you are. I hope things continue to go well for you. Maybe some day I'll give one of these a try, they look like a lot of fun.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old May 23, 2017, 11:48 PM   #8
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
Quote:
The starting pressures are 37,000 PSI, and the maximum pressures are 45,000 PSI.
How is the pressure being measured?
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old May 24, 2017, 10:03 AM   #9
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
All

Thank you jetinteriorguy! I did bite my tongue so much, my face looked like the end of a shotgun shell...and some reprise slipped out, but I do understand the infection of liberalism is everywhere.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 24, 2017, 10:11 AM   #10
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
JohnKSa

John,
The pressures, powder charges and velocities are computer projections.
Power Pistol was tested, as it's the only powder available to me at this time.
The velocities were all within +/- 10 feet per second of projections...so pressures should follow suit.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 26, 2017, 10:09 AM   #11
COSteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Posts: 1,344
Are your velocity projections still based upon the Glock 29's barrel length? You might want to look at a longer barrel for your testing because I've found that Power Pistol loves a 6" barrel.

I developed the longslide Glock 20/21L conversion in 2004 with the help of Kevin of KKM and have since shot some 9,000+ hot 10mm loads out of it. My best performance to date are my 'nuclear' 165grn Speer Gold Dot handloads over Power Pistol and at my range (6,100ft asl on a 84° day) using an Oeheler 35 chrono, I've produced 10rd string averages of 1,589fps.

As it looked in 2004 with the world's first 6" KKM 45-10MM conversion barrel:

COSteve is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 04:58 PM   #12
Ruger45LC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
Pretty neat! It must take a lot to come up with your own cartridge.

Here's some numbers I've got with a 357 SIG 4.5" KKM Glock barrel.

- New Starline brass
- 800x powder
- all loaded to 1.140"
- all using actual .357" bullets
-- velocities are averages round to the nearest 5fps

125gr XTP: 1,620 fps
140gr XTP: 1,455 fps
158gr XTP: 1,390 fps

Others have played with 180's and done well.
Ruger45LC is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 07:35 PM   #13
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davelliott
The starting pressures are 37,000 PSI, and the maximum pressures are
45,000 PSI. The C.O.A.L has been reduced to 1.280 to accommodate a wider range of pistol magazines and hopefully appeal to a larger group.
I hope you're aware that the SAAMI maximum length for .45 ACP is 1.275 inches. The SAAMI spec for the .38 Super is 1.220" to 1.280." That maximum length was chosen, I'm quite certain, because that was the longest dimension that would fit into a 1911 magazine and function.

Regardless of what you hope to accomplish, in your earlier round of posts I believe you mention the 1911. If you hope to sell this new cartridge for use in the 1911, it has to fit the gun. Starting off with a round that's longer than the maximum for a 1911, and which will then be subject to manufacturing tolerances, is probably not a great idea.

Even so, it appears you're shoveling water against the tide. Basically, what you're creating is a .38 Super +P+ (or ++P++). The .38 Super is the maximum size you can fit into a 1911, but you want to get far more performance out of the same size round. And to boost the pressures, you need to use thicker brass, which in turn results in even less case volume.

Have any of these ammunition companies you have discussed this with agreed to run pressure tests?

Last edited by Aguila Blanca; May 28, 2017 at 07:50 PM.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 09:04 PM   #14
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
Ruger45LC

Yes, but the 357 Ring Of Fire offers higher magazine capacity than the SIG, just like it does over the 10mm.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 09:06 PM   #15
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
COSteve

These are based on a 5 1-2" ported barrel in the Glock 20.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 09:19 PM   #16
Davelliott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 14, 2015
Posts: 138
Aquila Blanca

As stated, the C.O.A.L. was reduced to 1.280 so it would fit in more pistols, meaning the 1911 also.
I'm very aware of SAAMI Specs.
I'm not using 38 super brass. I'm not using 38 super bore either, so relax and enjoy the future. It's waiting for you.
Davelliott is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 09:54 PM   #17
disseminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
Quote:
I'm not using 38 super brass. I'm not using 38 super bore either, so relax and enjoy the future. It's waiting for you.


I'm not sure there is a call for this kind of cartridge, but your enthusiasm is admirable. When is the full unveiling?
disseminator is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 11:03 PM   #18
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
Aguila Blanca

What is the fastest speed that a .38 Super could push some of these bullets and stay within the 38 Super's pressure limit? Take the 125 grain bullet, for example.
74A95 is online now  
Old May 28, 2017, 11:25 PM   #19
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davelliott
As stated, the C.O.A.L. was reduced to 1.280 so it would fit in more pistols, meaning the 1911 also.
I'm very aware of SAAMI Specs.
I'm not using 38 super brass. I'm not using 38 super bore either, so relax and enjoy the future. It's waiting for you.
You completely missed my point. 1.280 inches is the maximum length for .38 Super, which is a cartridge that was developed specifically for the 1911. You had to reduce the length of your prototype to get down to the maximum length that will fit a 1911. Have you heard about manufacturing tolerances? Buy a box of any brand name commercial ammunition and measure a sampling of, say, ten rounds picked at random out of the box. Here's a hint: they won't all be the same length.

I understand that you're not using .38 Super brass. That was my second point. In order to boost the pressure significantly higher than .38 Super, you have to use heavier brass, which reduces case volume, which further increases pressure.

I don't have to relax to enjoy the future if this cartridge is what you mean by the future. To you it's obviously some kind of holy grail, and I give you a lot of credit for your perseverance. Personally, I've shot .357 Magnum, and I'm just not interested. I have 1911s in .45 ACP, 9mm, .38 Super, .40 S&W, and .22LR. That's plenty for me.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old May 28, 2017, 11:40 PM   #20
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by 74A95
What is the fastest speed that a .38 Super could push some of these bullets and stay within the 38 Super's pressure limit? Take the 125 grain bullet, for example.
I have no idea. I don't reload for .38 Super.

If you trust Wikipedia, they list a 124-grain projectile at 1,411 fps.

The Hodgdon/Winchester on-line reloading data site lists one load for .38 Super, again a 124-grain projectile. They show 1,245 fps at 34,600 psi.

In commercial ammo:

PPU ...................... 130-grain, 1,214 fps
Geco ..................... 124-grain, 1,290 fps
Remington UMC ..... 130-grain, 1,215 fps
Aguila .................... 130-grain, 1,220 fps
PMC ...................... 130-grain, 1,092 fps
Fiocchi ................... 129-grain, 1,180 fps
Magtech ................. 130-grain, 1,215 fps
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old May 29, 2017, 12:43 AM   #21
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
I have no idea. I don't reload for .38 Super.

If you trust Wikipedia, they list a 124-grain projectile at 1,411 fps.

The Hodgdon/Winchester on-line reloading data site lists one load for .38 Super, again a 124-grain projectile. They show 1,245 fps at 34,600 psi.

In commercial ammo:

PPU ...................... 130-grain, 1,214 fps
Geco ..................... 124-grain, 1,290 fps
Remington UMC ..... 130-grain, 1,215 fps
Aguila .................... 130-grain, 1,220 fps
PMC ...................... 130-grain, 1,092 fps
Fiocchi ................... 129-grain, 1,180 fps
Magtech ................. 130-grain, 1,215 fps

I guess it depends on what source you look at.

Commercial ammo: Actual chronographed values: www.38super.net

Buffalo Bore 125 = 1390 fps
Corbon 124 = 1375 fps
Georgia Arms 124 = 1386 fps
Wilson Combat 124 = 1383 fps

Commercial ammo loaded to make Major power factor pushes a 124 grain bullet to 1447 fps. https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/...er-ammunition/

The Hodgdon/Winchester on-line reloading data site lists one load for .38 Super, a 125 grain HAP, at 1,399 fps at 29,700 CUP (SAAMI max is 33,000 CUP; 36,500 psi). In fact, they have several loads listed at over 1300 fps in the 124/125 weight range.

Western powders shows published velocities with 124/125 grain bullets around 1400 fps with A#7. An article that used that data found speeds over 1400 fps: http://www.shootingtimes.com/reloadi...-the-38-super/

Vihtavouri shows a load with a 124 grain bullet and N105 at 1501 fps from a 5.5 in. barrel.

Some of the old IPSC loads in 38 Super are very similar to Dave's values. http://www.k8nd.com/documents/hl38sup.pdf

People who have given Dave grief are the ones that don't handload cartridges like the 38 Super and 9X23 so they don't know what they're really capable of even staying within their pressure limits, and they only look at limited resources for their 'estimates' of pressures and velocities.

If you have experience loading these cartridges at the high end, and you look at better informed places on the web, you'll see that Dave's numbers are reasonable.

I'd love to get my hands on some Norma R123 to see if it really lives up to QL's estimates.
74A95 is online now  
Old May 29, 2017, 02:46 AM   #22
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
Quote:
Some of the old IPSC loads in 38 Super are very similar to Dave's values.
Having looked through the sources and loads that you provide, I don't really agree that the numbers are "very similar" to the ROF performance claims, but let's take your claim as true for the sake of argument.

If .38 Super performance numbers really are "very similar" to ROF performance, then what's the point of the ROF? Why not just use the .38 Super instead--especially since it operates at lower pressures.

It should be pretty obvious that there are only two logical options here. Either the numbers aren't "very similar" or there's no practical reason for the ROF to exist.
Quote:
People who have given Dave grief are the ones that don't handload cartridges like the 38 Super and 9X23 so they don't know what they're really capable of even staying within their pressure limits, and they only look at limited resources for their 'estimates' of pressures and velocities.
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Are you claiming that a cartridge claimed to operate at a maximum pressure of 45,000PSI will be able to outperform a cartridge with virtually identical dimensions that operates at a maximum pressure of 55,000PSI?
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old May 29, 2017, 06:54 AM   #23
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,715
Here's some data on what others have done with the 38 super, just for comparison:

http://www.k8nd.com/documents/hl38sup.pdf
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old May 29, 2017, 09:34 AM   #24
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by 74A95
The Hodgdon/Winchester on-line reloading data site lists one load for .38 Super, a 125 grain HAP, at 1,399 fps at 29,700 CUP (SAAMI max is 33,000 CUP; 36,500 psi). In fact, they have several loads listed at over 1300 fps in the 124/125 weight range.
With respect, I checked the Hodgdon/Winchester on-line site immediately before posting my information to which you responded. The site lists NO loads for .38 Super, and ONE load for .38 Super +P. And that one load is for a 124-grain projectile, not a 125-grain HAP. The velocity is what I posted, not what you posted.

http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol

The load I found on that site pushes a 124-grain projectile to 1,245 fps at 34,600 psi. Do you really think it's possible for a load out of the same case to push a heavier (marginally) projectile 12 percent faster at something like 10 percent lower pressure?

BTW -- the Hodgdon/Winchester on-line site returns pressures in psi, not CUP, so your data could not have come from that source.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old May 29, 2017, 09:54 AM   #25
74A95
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
Aguila Blanca

You're dead wrong. Look again. Look under the data for 38 Super Auto. There is data for 10 bullet weights from 90 to 150 grains, and 13 powders.

Here's some:

BULLET WEIGHT
125 GR. HDY HAP
Starting Loads Maximum Loads Manufacturer
Powder Bullet Diam. C.O.L. Grs. Vel. (ft/s) Pressure Grs. Vel. (ft/s) Pressure


Hodgdon Lil'Gun .356" 1.210" 12.2 1,285 23,900 CUP 13.6C 1,399 29,700 CUP
Hodgdon Longshot .356" 1.210" 5.8 1,170 25,500 CUP 6.6 1,294 32,400 CUP
Winchester 572 .356" 1.210" 5.5 1,135 26,000 PSI 6.3 1,266 34,800 PSI
Hodgdon HS-6 .356" 1.210" 6.9 1,175 25,700 CUP 7.7 1,300 32,300 CUP
Hodgdon CFE Pistol .356" 1.210" 5.5 1,166 26,500 CUP 6.1 1,259 32,300 CUP
Winchester AutoComp .356" 1.210" 5.5 1,148 24,800 CUP 6.0 1,240 31,200 CUP
IMR IMR Unequal .356" 1.210" 6.0 1,170 28,400 PSI 7.5 1,333 34,200 PSI
Hodgdon Universal .356" 1.210" 4.5 1,105 25,500 CUP 5.1 1,202 31,700 CUP
Winchester 231 .356" 1.210" 4.8 1,113 27,100 CUP 5.4 1,237 31,900 CUP
Hodgdon HP-38 .356" 1.210" 4.8 1,113 27,100 CUP 5.4 1,237 31,900 CUP
IMR IMR Target .356" 1.210" 5.0 1,161 27,100 PSI 5.6 1,251 27,100 PSI
Hodgdon Titegroup .356" 1.210" 4.2 1,082 25,400 CUP 4.8 1,200 31,600 CUP
Hodgdon Clays .356" 1.210" 3.6 1,034 25,900 CUP 4.2 1,132 32,100 CUP
Hodgdon Titewad .356" 1.210" 3.8 1,050 26,300 CUP 4.4 1,136 31,200 CUP
74A95 is online now  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10773 seconds with 8 queries