|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 15, 2017, 09:51 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
Bought a new Diamondback DB9
I've owned a few before but sold all due to concerns about construction. However, for some reason I can't shake wanting the DB9 pocket pistol to work...so I just bought an SL model from Buds today. Part of my concern was I didn't care for the finish-the anodized stainless takes care of that worry.
I've previously owned the Kahrs (PM40, CM9, CW380, and PM9) but found them all too heavy and block like for pocket carry. Additionally, the 9 and 40 are just huge compared to the 380 options. I think my photo here of my P3AT vs CM9 captures the difference better than putting the two on top of each other: Time will tell. I'll update with a comparison between it and my LCP gen2 in stainless. |
August 15, 2017, 09:56 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 30, 2010
Posts: 704
|
Bought a new Diamondback DB9
I had an Original Gen 1, and it totally sucked. Numerous failures to feed and a cracked frame at around 535 rounds. They did replace the frame and my gunsmith told me right there to sell it.
They have their own forum. Check it out. I believe you need to modify the magazine with a Keltec spring, and use a dremel to polish the slide. Best of luck but that's the last gun I'd consider getting again. I carry a Glock 19 MOS with an RMR. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro |
August 16, 2017, 11:12 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
It is possible to anodized stainless steel, but it's not a particularly durable finish, and usually requires some sort of protective sealer coat. It's not particularly suited to firearms. |
|
August 16, 2017, 11:45 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
Well cuss. I selected the SL (anodized stainless) over the regular stainless because of a better appearance and thinking them as equal. Diamonback told me they were equivalent and both stainless steel...
Shoot. https://diamondbackfirearms.com/coll...nt=27566994758 |
August 16, 2017, 02:11 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
|
Anodizing is a chemical treatment for aluminum. You can't anodize stainless steel. The web site says the slide is "coated" -- it doesn't say with what. Anodizing is not a coating, it's a chemical conversion of the surface payer of the base aluminum alloy.
|
August 16, 2017, 02:22 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
Well I just put in a request to Buds to change to order to the stainless model. Hasn't shipped yet, so I hope it's possible.
|
August 16, 2017, 08:29 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2014
Posts: 304
|
wild cat, I understand wanting the DB9 to be a success. I fear the design pushes the dimensions and tolerances just past the point of dependable reliability.
I have one that I'm in the process of selling - bought it used and the back rails broke off after about a 150 rounds. DB sent me a replacement frame at no cost - so great customer service from my perspective. I just can't trust it for carry though. If they'd change the frame to steel, I'd keep one & find ammo that was dependable. Best of luck with yours. |
August 16, 2017, 08:42 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
Every time I consider buying one of these I do two things. First I remember my experience with the DB380 and then I visit the Diamondback forum and read a few threads. Problem solved.
|
August 17, 2017, 09:29 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
Well, I have decided not accept the transfer.
I was on the DB forum yesterday and someone just posted that the one hollow point that is suppose to be flawless through the DB9, Remington UMC 115gr jhp, failed a person multiple times. Given 115gr isn't great to begin with, I'm just going to accept the LCP for what it is and |
August 18, 2017, 10:13 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
|
|
August 18, 2017, 01:59 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
I carry a DB9. I have had no problem with 9mm ball ammo. With hollow points, what I do is keep one in the chamber, my next round is 9mm ball ammo and the rest are hollow points. It seems that the first round out of the magazine tilts differently than the rest. I can't say this works in all DB9's but it works in mine.
|
August 18, 2017, 11:03 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Location: Freeport, IL
Posts: 833
|
I was in your situation wanting a DB9 because of the size.
I read some reviews and watched videos. I decided to accept the small increase in size and go with the Kahr CM9. Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk |
August 19, 2017, 11:16 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
|
|
August 19, 2017, 07:01 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2015
Posts: 116
|
Bought a db380 last year, one trip to the range and I sold it.... Nuff said.
__________________
EAA SAR k2p 9mm Beretta px4 storm Taurus pt111 g2 9mm Sig Mosquito 22lr Sig Sauer P250 9mm full size Walther PPS m2 9mm S&W Bodyguard 380 Ruger LCP 380 |
August 19, 2017, 10:55 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
|
The DB9 was the worst pistol I have ever owned. Horrible reliability and worse customer service. My advice is to stay away. Garbage.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer |
August 21, 2017, 07:44 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2006
Posts: 1,066
|
With the reputation these pustols have, I don't know how they stay in buisness. I tried the DB380 out and it was an unreliable pos at best. The best reviews come from people who don't shoot them at all or put a magazine or two through it.
|
August 21, 2017, 02:22 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
Quote:
|
|
August 23, 2017, 08:25 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
No. The DB forum defiantly supports these guns don't function as is. The question is if the PF-9 mag spring truly fixes the jamming issue.
|
August 23, 2017, 09:06 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,048
|
Well what are we really talking about here?
I mean a quick search shows that right THIS very second you can get one from Classic Firearms for 179.99 shipped.. And who knows it might have been even cheaper in the past meaning it'll probably be cheaper in the future. Personally when we get to the 200ish price range Im willing to gamble and see for my self (usually). https://www.classicfirearms.com/diam...m-for-sale-db9 It has been my experience that most of the negativity of a particular brand or model is almost always blown out of proportion, The internet loves drama and hyperbole. Actually maybe it's just the gun community.. I mean people still bring up the broken Beretta slides 30 years ago. I have never owned a DB, I know the 380 had generally good rep and that it shot well, although I seem to recall a few people having cracked frames, but what % it's hard to say.. I mean you're more likely to find someone vocal about a bad experience then a good one. Unless money is so tight you can't risk it I'd go ahead and get one if you want one.. it's about the cost of a case of 9mm. Here's a video of the owner and some of the factory, Kinda interesting. Apparently they're known for making boats. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMXBjlJdtvg Last edited by JoeSixpack; August 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM. |
August 30, 2017, 02:52 PM | #20 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
I do like the diamond pattern on the grips, but I've heard some bad reports on the Diamondbacks. I'd probably not carry it.
|
August 31, 2017, 01:51 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2010
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
|
|
August 31, 2017, 04:32 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
I canceled the "anodized" slide DB9 order.
However, I am still interested in these stupid things and if I can't come to reason in the next day, I'll plunk down for a stainless slide. Ugh. |
August 31, 2017, 08:20 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2014
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
I won't criticize since I have my share of "range only" guns, & project guns too! |
|
August 31, 2017, 10:38 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,623
|
Just did it.
Repurchased with the regular stainless steel slide. I was looking at a cart with an LC9s stainless and the DB9 stainless. I can't help but think my LCP would be pointless if the DB9 worked, so might as well try and get the Bud's warranty if it doesn't. We shall see what this brings |
August 31, 2017, 10:48 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2015
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,203
|
I've always wanted to like that gun. Hoping you have good luck with it. Have to imagine most of them work or why would they still be in business?
|
|
|