|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 26, 2008, 03:03 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2008
Posts: 2
|
Identifying a ball and cap pistol
I recently picked up a ball and cap pistol, mainly just because the price was right and I think it'd be a nice addition to the collection.
But at any rate, I'm having a hard time Identifying it, Looks like a brass frame, .31 cal pocket pistol with a stage coach and cowboy engraving on the cylinder. Lastly there is a BZ imprinted on the frame. Any help would be greatly appreciated just so I can put a name with it. |
November 26, 2008, 07:00 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,539
|
If you were making a good product, wouldn't you put your name or a brand name on it?
It will take pictures to identify the model of gun it is a copy of for sure, but the stagecoach holdup scene is a Colt design. Pretty new, BZ is the Italian date code for 2005. |
November 26, 2008, 10:36 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Does it have a round trigger guard or squareback? It sounds like an 1849 Pocket (round trigger guard) or an 1848 Baby Dragoon (squareback trigger guard) both in .31 caliber, though the originals were not made in brass. I had one and I used O buckshot (.320). Great little gun but tough to load (small loading lever). A pic would be good.
|
December 31, 2008, 03:11 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2008
Posts: 2
|
Turns out to be a replica of a 1948 Wells Fargo pocket pistol, as identified by the old guys at a black powder club near here with the aid of a rather large reference guide book form a local gunsmith. Thanks for the help guys, and yea loading it isn't much fun due to that little packing lever... I may post pictures of it later if I get a chance.
|
December 31, 2008, 09:30 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
Quote:
This 'defarbing' practice is very widespread, I find. I'm surprised you haven't come across it. |
|
December 31, 2008, 01:14 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
But from what was being described led me to believe we were looking at an 1849 Uberti Wells Fargo. It has the brass square trigger guard. However, it does not have a brass block. Not aware of one with a brass block. But there are a lot of things I do not know. Continuing along, the reference to the Pocket Model doesn't sit well. The pocket model is a version of the Wells Fargo. But with Uberti it has a round trigger guard. And it comes with a loader. Something the 1849 Wells Fargo didn't have. I can hardly wait to see a picture of this revolver. I am trying to learn new things every day. And this will be yet another one.
__________________
The parting shot...
"Those who hammer their guns into plows, will plow for those who do not." Thomas Jefferson |
|
December 31, 2008, 01:37 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,393
|
They always call this a 1849 "Baby Drogroon" It is a 31. Bought it in 1964.
|
December 31, 2008, 01:47 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
|
From the description it is a brass framed replica of a New Model Pocket Pistol - commonly refered to as an 1849 Pocket Pistol. What is commonly called the Wells Fargo model is the Old Model Pocket Pistol or Model of 1848 Pocket pistol or Baby Dragoon. These pistols did not have loading levers. There were only a few (less than 10) Thousand of the 1848s made. Wells Fargo supposedly purchased a large number of them for their agents which is how the replicas have gotten that name today. The Improved Pocket Pistol or Model of 1849 Pocket Pistol had the loading levers. The other noticeable difference between the 48 & 49 models were the cylinder slots and trigger guards. The 48 had square back trigger guards and round or oval shaped slots like the Patterson, Walker and 1st Model Dragoons. The 49s had round trigger guards & and rectangular slots. There was also a model introduced in 1850 with a six shot cylinder in place of the five shot cylinder. That model is just lumped in with the 1849 models now days.
Current replica manufacturers mix and match features between models to suit their manufacturing and sales priorities; so, you can pretty much call it what you want.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce Last edited by Fingers McGee; December 31, 2008 at 07:22 PM. |
December 31, 2008, 01:47 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31, 2008, 02:06 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,539
|
mykeal,
I have not heard of "defarbing" a replica gun to fake it up for reenactments. I did once see at a gun show a replica complete with cartridge conversion, aged, faked, marked, and tagged with fraud in mind, though. I knew what it was because I have one for CAS with all modern markings and finish intact. Somebody else might not know the differences from a real Richards Conversion. Like the very rough Remington replica I saw bought for real at an antique auction. I will ask my local reenactors about it at the next opportunity. Sounds pretty hokey to me, though. And would he not have removed the Italian date code as well as the maker's name and foreign proof marks? If anybody gets close enough to me to read the trademark on my sixshooter, he is TOO close. |
December 31, 2008, 03:29 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
On The Muzzleloading Forum in the Pistol subforum you will find a member who uses the name Poor Private. He is such a reenactor; he claims that the events he goes to inspect the guns for modern markings and will reject those that are not 'defarbed'. He assures me this is a very common practice, and is somewhat ardent in his defense of it. I made the political mistake of saying that defarbing was, in my opinion, outright fraud; he did not appreciate the characterization. He is a member I respect, save for this one issue, and he was joined by several other members of that forum in defending the practice, so I chose to disengage without changing my opinion.
I believe the unit he practices with is the 2nd Kentucky something, and they apparently go to events throughout the midwest and eastern US. |
December 31, 2008, 04:55 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Quote:
I have two C&B that have been defarbed, no attempt was made by the seller to indicate that they are originals, just defarbed repro's. Some even go to the length of stamping the original marking on there re-enacting guns. |
|
December 31, 2008, 10:09 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
I defarbed my old Rigarmi 58 Remington and rusted it up a bit. Not to attempt to pass it off as original but for my own satisfaction.
|
|
|