The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 9, 2017, 10:18 PM   #26
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,981
Using JB Weld, Metalset A4 or any other epoxy is simply ridiculous.
There are so many reasons it won't work that I'm not even going to get into it.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old August 9, 2017, 10:42 PM   #27
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Since this thread was dragged back to the top, I might as well share my opinion of filling the hole...


I carried a 642, with a 'flag delete' done on it, for almost six years. In that time, the revolver got covered in dirt, dust, lint, sweat, and all manner of other undesirable jetsam.
Not once, did anything in the hole cause it to bobble, stutter, or fail.
It just kept on truckin'.
Methinks the worries about the hole are a matter of over-thinking...
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old August 11, 2017, 03:08 PM   #28
arquebus357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2016
Location: Atlanta, Georgia area
Posts: 455
S&W added the lock for the sole purpose of adding value to older S&W revolvers without the locks. Now, perhaps gun shops can finally get their ridiculous prices for all those sad old S&W revolvers laying in the bottom shelves that no one wants.
arquebus357 is offline  
Old August 11, 2017, 06:14 PM   #29
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,981
Apparently, people just make stuff up for this thread....
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old August 11, 2017, 06:26 PM   #30
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
Though I dislike the locks quite a bit and don't own any "locked" S&W guns, I've eventually come to accept them because they are not going away anytime soon. Just ignore them, seriously. Shoot the gun and enjoy it.
Model12Win is offline  
Old August 11, 2017, 07:03 PM   #31
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
Quote:
What will determine the demise of the IL has more to do with the perception of the public towards how safe guns are in households with children, than the decade old rant of boycotting.
That "old boycott" actually WORKED. Unfortunately, so did the law of unintended consequences.

We didn't boycott S&W just because of the lock. It was the British owners acceptance of the deal the Clinton's wanted, which included a lot more than just the lock. The lock was just the "in your face, gunowners!" part of it.

The boycott worked. S&W stock tanked, and the Brit holding company that owned S&W sold it, FOR A LOSS. And with them gone, there was no deal with the Clintons.

However, at that point, the law of unintended consequences took over. At least some, (if not all) of the group that came up with the money to buy S&W were the people who designed the lock!!!

It's their child, they created it, they think its a wonderful and needed thing!..so you won't see the lock go away, until those people do.

other makers have put locks in their guns WITHOUT having an "in your face" keyhole. So, either S&W (or the people who owned S&W) either didn't think through to impact to their customer base, or they DID, and went ahead and did it anyway, knowing what an insult it would be. And to put the cherry on the top they changed the shape of the cylinder latch. To me that was the worst part. I could even live with the hole, but not the "new" cylinder latch.

It doesn't look right, and makes the lock hole even more obvious.

I will admit, I haven't bought a new S&W since they stopped pinning the barrels. Did consider one of the X frames, but there's that lock and new wave latch, again...

S&W could have been smart, could have put the lock in, in such a way as to not change the traditional look of their guns. Ruger did. S&W CHOSE not to, and for that, I cannot, and will not forgive them.

Not that it matters much, really. In time, people will forget the reason they got mad about it in the first place. And the next generation will grow up with it, never knowing anything different, just as they do wit all the bad laws that get passed....
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old August 12, 2017, 06:00 AM   #32
springer99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 2008
Posts: 355
Over the years, I've owned, and still own, Smith's with and without the lock. Bought some of them new and some of them used. Honestly, I've never had a problem with the ones' with locks and have to say that I don't even give them a thought anymore.

If the lock bothers you, there are options to plug the hole but, to my mind, all that does is call more attention to the hole.
springer99 is offline  
Old August 12, 2017, 07:00 AM   #33
UncleEd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
Personally, I LOVE the locks and have had several Smith revolvers from
the 1960s retrofitted with them.
UncleEd is offline  
Old August 12, 2017, 07:32 AM   #34
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by g.willikers View Post
Focus on the shooting instead of the gun and those little irritations will soon become invisible.
Messing with it could easily result in disfigurements that could prove even more irritating.
Leaving it in original condition with the removed parts in hand would make it more desirable for resale, too.
^^^This. Get over it. No different than those billboard sized warnings on Rugers a few year back. Focus on the front sight while looking thru the rear sight and you will never see the Hillary hole. Maybe change your priorities and focus on the accuracy of the new S&Ws instead of the IL. Or just buy something else.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old August 12, 2017, 07:45 AM   #35
18DAI
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 2,156
Were it not for that idiot lock, Id have never discovered Ruger revolvers. Thanks Safety Wesson!

I have a nice collection of GP100s and two great SP101s. I have not purchased a new s&w since 2001. And have no intention of ever buying another.
__________________
S&W Model 19 Combat Magnum. Everything you need in a revolver, and nothing you don't.
18DAI is offline  
Old August 12, 2017, 08:40 AM   #36
JDinAZ
Member
 
Join Date: August 4, 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by buck460XVR View Post
^^^This. Get over it. No different than those billboard sized warnings on Rugers a few year back. Focus on the front sight while looking thru the rear sight and you will never see the Hillary hole. Maybe change your priorities and focus on the accuracy of the new S&Ws instead of the IL. Or just buy something else.
I would agree to an extent. You are correct about focusing on the accuracy and enjoying just shooting these thing or any guns for that matter. They are all fun to shoot in my book.

The want and need for many of us in removing the lock is that we do still love the Smith revolvers and do carry them for defense on the streets or protection in the woods from wild animals. Which makes the potential lock failure become a dice roll with your life. Personally I'm not that much of a gambler to bet my life on my carry gun till I delete the lock.

Now just having them to target shoot is another thing, the hole in the frame is an eyesore. But if it happened to fail on the range then its not such a big deal and everyone still gets to go home to their family at the end of the day.
__________________
R/S
J.D.
https://www.originalprecision.com/
JDinAZ is offline  
Old August 13, 2017, 07:46 AM   #37
rep1954
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Location: Mid Western Michigan
Posts: 1,187
I sure wish threads about the S&W IL would quit popping up on the internet that's when I remember that they are on guns that I own and then I have to wait a few days to forget about them again.
rep1954 is offline  
Old August 13, 2017, 08:59 AM   #38
JDinAZ
Member
 
Join Date: August 4, 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 23
They don't bother me much anymore. I throw one of my Lock Delete part sets in and it goes away. Now I can get a few other Smiths I've wanted
__________________
R/S
J.D.
https://www.originalprecision.com/
JDinAZ is offline  
Reply

Tags
ils , lock , smith&wesson


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09046 seconds with 8 queries