|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 7, 2011, 08:08 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Safety First Please !
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...bly-wrong.html
Safety includes what can happen in bad situations ! No excuse for this .The experimant should have been done far away from any houses, cars etc !! Like out in the desert.
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
December 7, 2011, 01:01 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Eastern, TN
Posts: 1,236
|
Mythbusters have a Misfire...
It appears the Mythbusters guys had a "misfire" of a CANNON
Please see the following: Quote:
These guys have always kinda scared me anytime they have dealt with firearms. Seems they didn't take into consideration what lay beyond their backstop.
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska - |
|
December 7, 2011, 01:18 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 637
|
OMG, thats a pretty big Oopsy
I thought they did their "tests" out in the boonies, not within a cannonball's-toss of minivans and soccer moms.
__________________
Maintaining a constant state of cat-like readiness and a heightened state of suspicious alertness. |
December 7, 2011, 01:26 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
Quote:
Really it takes common sense. It deals with recklessness of the incident. If some guy was just trying to make fireworks in his back yard, and screws up, then we didn't really do much. If property damage, the guy was responsible. But if he had a bunch of kids helping, then its a different story. How ever if he's experimenting with pipe bombs and such, its a different matter. That in itself is a criminal matter. If he is building a cannon, and it blows up in his back yard, its reckless endangerment. However if he tries his home made cannon at the range, and something goes wrong, and the investigation showed he did have some safety measures, then we treated it as an accident. This is "in general" Understand all incidents are different, and are handled different. But you get the general ideal how I handed it. Other locations may or may not be different.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
||
December 7, 2011, 02:13 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
Yup haven't liked the way they handle firearms, the curving a bullet one comes to mind, for those that hadn't seen that one, the take a pistol swing their arm and pull the trigger (taken from the movie wanted). They just did it very haphazardly. http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/myth...-minimyth.html
Overall a great show |
December 7, 2011, 02:24 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2010
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,293
|
Yeah those cannon balls do bounce a bit....I can't wait for the actual footage.
I think the guy whos house got a big ole hole in it just won the lottery though. |
December 7, 2011, 03:17 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2010
Posts: 720
|
Sometimes a person or group can take every safety precaution available, and still have an "event." Its like Murphy's law...Mister Murphy came to visit them this time. It seems that in this case no one is injured. I can not say for sure what happened as neither I, and most others were not there.
I would like to see the actual "myth" they were trying to bust, and also to see them go through everything in an episode, including touching on the investigation, damage, and any damages that are paid out. Why? I feel it would be a good, realistic lesson to others that when things go bad, even for those in TV and movies, that there can be a huge price to pay, and it can be used as a learning experience. With the mythbusters crew testing various things, not just cannon, but also more common firearms, perhaps it can be a wake up call that things dont always go as they do on TV. While myself and others here try our best to be safe, I for one, and am sure others agree that we can "all" as a group try to strive for improving our safety. Just glad no one was injured physically. Last edited by Fishing_Cabin; December 7, 2011 at 03:31 PM. Reason: spelling |
December 7, 2011, 03:29 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Posts: 166
|
Reckon a surface danger zone overlay for an old cannon might be pretty hard to come by...
I enjoy the show as well, however, I too have cringed at some of the things they have done, with and without firearms. They do things, at times, that are unnecessarily risky to their crew. They need an improved risk assessment process IMO... |
December 7, 2011, 04:02 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,955
|
Quote:
My brother used to live in Alameda County (Fremont), and I know there are some large areas of open land in the western parts of the county, but I guess not quite open enough for that particular experiment. Found an aerial view of the range: http://wikimapia.org/8706724/Alameda...Disposal-Range I hope they didn't fire the cannon in the southern direction! To the north, it doesn't look like it could hit anything for quite a distance. |
|
December 7, 2011, 04:17 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 31, 2000
Location: Middle Peninsula, VA
Posts: 1,588
|
A bit puzzled as to why they call it a "misfire". I thought misfire was when it didn't go off, or hangfired. Maybe I am missing their meaning.
|
December 7, 2011, 09:08 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Posts: 274
|
If they were using the same set-up as they did with the pirate episode, they were firing to the EAST...which makes some sense, as there is a decent sized hill that way that would seem to be at least somewhat effective as a backstop. I'm taking a guess that they missed the target completely and the cannonball skipped off their backstop and went over the hill. I can't find anything on the address of the houses that were hit, so I can't Google Earth it...
It'll be interesting to see if they show ANY of the footage in an episode, or whether this particular myth will be "Not Happened" away. |
December 8, 2011, 03:44 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 1999
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Posts: 13,198
|
Threads merged.
|
December 8, 2011, 04:13 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
From what I have gathered, the Alameda County bomb range has been encroached upon by new housing development (much like so many of our military bases), and lost much of it's buffer zone.
What may have been safe in the past, may not be today. Quote:
You don't have any desert, nor the wide open spaces we enjoy in certain areas out west. On a totally separate note: Do you understand what the San Francisco area is like? It isn't a tiny little village in the middle of the desert. The San Francisco area is actually fairly fertile, and is extremely populated. Driving to "the desert" to test this cannon, would be about the same as having them take a road trip to Reno, Nevada (or some one living in Syracuse NY driving to Philadelphia PA!). Don't forget that the bomb range allowed them to use the cannon there. If you're going to place ill-informed blame, be sure to specify who you're sticking it to.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
December 8, 2011, 09:09 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 610
|
Yea I wouldn't say the blame lays entirely with the Mythbusters. If you asked me where the safest place to shoot a cannon is, and one of the options was "bomb range" I would probably pick that too. Besides they have the sheriff's department and explosives experts on hand for this. If there was something unsafe about the experiment those people should have spoke up. That's why they're there.
And since others posted that housing developments have encroached on the range over the years. Then it seems it's the range's responsibility to reassess their buffer zone and see if they're still operating a safe range. Sometimes accidents happen and all the precautions in the world won't prevent them 100% of the time. I expect the homeowners will be getting a nice wad of cash after all this. |
December 8, 2011, 09:15 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 2009
Location: Quadling Country
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
The truth is that when you work with explosives and anything in a system that has a failure rate then eventually you will have a failure that could potentially be catastrophic. It will be interesting to see if there is another incident in a short time frame from now. Often in military units when there is one then another occurs soon after. I don't know the show production cycle and what risk reduction measures they have taken however.
__________________
Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war. |
|
December 8, 2011, 12:02 PM | #16 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Quote:
There were a LOT of professionals involved in this mishap.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
December 8, 2011, 09:20 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
|
I assume they were using solid shot.
When I commanded an Army EOD Detachment in the Early 70's One of our primary off post missions was the recovery of and disposal of Civil War munitions. We handled them with extreme caution and had a number of them deflagrate during the disposal prodecure. After the first one we set up witness panels with standard targets., During subsquent procedures we were able to document the effectiveness of these centry old projectiles. Safety note: Handle with extreme caution. |
December 8, 2011, 09:36 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Posts: 4,092
|
Cannonballs as well as bullets go where they are aimed.
If the cannon they were using was properly secured this probably would not have happened. Misfire or not,what the cannonball was shot out of was not aimed properly when it released the cannonball from the cannon. I would guess that the crew misjudged the recoil on the cannon thinking simply the cannons own weight-which they are heavy as all get out-and that's pretty heavy-would keep the cannon aimed at the objects in the cannonballs way to slow it down. Most cannons have a set screw for elevation but the cannon itself should also have been tied down to the ground in some manner to keep it from hopping up when it fired. You would not believe the motions that can happen with ordinace firing equipment. One of the most passively dangerous things you can fire if an old salt does'nt give you about a fifteen minutes heads up on how to not die using the thing. This 'accident' is a very serious thing and not something the producers of Mythbusters are going to be able to apologize their way out of. Look for some massive fines as well as lawsuits over this situation. I have watched the show since it started and thought like most people here thought that they were in the boondocks when they shot off ordinace in their many experiments. And contrary to what some people are posting,I have always been impressed that they have at least addressed the lethality and danger of most of the experiments they have engaged in and had safety procedures in place before they started them. This was a surpised to me when it happened and I do not expected it to ever happen at Mythbusters again. And Thank God no ones family member was right in the path of that cannonball. That just shows you the true destructive power of what the soldiers who fought in all the old wars faced on the battlefield as well as the bystanders whose homes were on those same battlefields too. |
December 8, 2011, 10:10 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 7, 2011
Posts: 134
|
These morons put people's lives in danger in order to make a buck. Someday, they, or one of these other reality shows, will kill someone.
|
December 8, 2011, 10:38 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
December 11, 2011, 05:28 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 229
|
Their biggest mistake was using a bomb range as an artillery range. The safety requirements of those to activities are very different.
As an aside... I've no idea how it works for municipally owned/operated ranges, but had they done this on a federal range what they did is actually criminal. In the federal game, for each energetics firing range there is what is called a "siting document." That document determines what activities are allowed to be performed on that site. If the document doesn't mention cannons, then it is quite literally illegal to operate cannons within that facility. Given that we're dealing with a police bomb range, I highly doubt that cannons are mentioned. Mind you, there's no reason to believe that a municipally owned/operated range operates under the same statutes, I merely bring it up to point out that such wrecklessness is already taken into account at the federal level. And yes, they were wreckless. |
December 11, 2011, 05:30 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Actually, they wrecked pretty effectively.
But they may have been reckless. |
December 11, 2011, 07:05 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 229
|
LOL... And now you know why I wasn't an English major.
|
December 11, 2011, 08:55 PM | #24 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
Maybe on a peninsula into one of the rivers. Building walls that can contain canon fore is s lot harder than containing mist handguns. Even an indoor rifle range faces some challenges. Quote:
Set off a large enough blast (or a shaped blast) and you may throw things outside the boundaries allowed. |
||
December 12, 2011, 12:37 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 229
|
Bomb ranges are pretty easy to define with a K324 distance.
Safe Distance = 324 * NEW^(1/3) |
|
|